Is This That Archive Guy Yall Are Obsessed With?

Can we talk about how the idea that STEM and the humanities are mortal enemies with no overlap is actually incredibly harmful and is not only preventing people from pursuing their passions but also part of the reason why the humanities aren’t given their proper respect? No, artists are not all snobby pretentious assholes who think they’re more cultured than everyone else and no scientists are not all emotionless robots who think they’re smarter than everyone else and it’s possible to be an artist and a scientist at the same time. By acting like you have to choose between STEM and humanities we are eliminating thousands of potential careers and causing unnecessary divisions in a time where nothing is more crucial than unity. I’m so tired of people acting like STEM majors are incapable of understanding art and humanities majors are incapable of understanding math when the two fields are crucial to one another. Who would design our architecture if it weren’t for artful engineers? Who would discover the rules of composition? At the end of the day we are all just people trying to learn and make a living, and all of these careers are important to humanity. People can’t say that STEM is more important than humanities if there’s no such thing as STEM vs humanities.

When the event is so gay you’re torn between calling it queerbait or canon honakana

so I got into grad school today with my shitty 2.8 gpa and the moral of the story is reblog those good luck posts for the love of god

75% decrease in insect biomass within my lifetime and I'm supposed to care about cover letters

sketch inspired by memoria

Since knights and firearms canonically existed at the same time im going to give link a gun

crossfaded off of birdsong and a ray of sunlight

Hot take of the day a lot of people are starting to use “being cunty” as an excuse for men over sexualizing female characters… no every woman wearing a skintight bikini while the men get full suits of armor isn’t cunty it’s misogyny and it’s weird

Someone pointing out a big glaring exception to your generalization isn’t “whataboutmeism” it’s just someone pointing out a flaw in your argument. If you said “everyone who can’t walk up a flight of stairs is a lazy pos” and a bunch of people tell you that they can’t because they’re disabled you can’t go “well OBVIOUSLY I don’t mean you” because like. Most people who can’t walk up a flight of stairs are disabled. Its not obvious at all that you don’t mean them actually