Akshayataa

Just putting this out there for those who don't know much about Kashmir and the conflict since quite a few marxists (or leftists) have taken the position that kashmir is occupied and should be free; Kashmir is actually the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It's a multi-ethnic and multi-religious state. Kashmir is claimed by Pakistan and China (who have even lesser claim to that region). Pakistan is a state created by Islamists for Islamic fundamentalism as they refused to share equal power with Hindus, they violently cleansed Hindus from the region they are currently occupying. Kashmiri "self-determination" has been paved by cleansing Kashmir off of its native Hindu population. Pakistan has settled non-Kashmiris en masse to Kashmir so no voting would be fair. "Self-determination" = ethno-nationalism at the cost of native ethnic groups within Kashmir. why are leftists or Marxist even supporting this? You can argue against the military presence, but if there wasn't a military presence there then that'd invite more attacks against Indians. Sorry but not sorry that we don't want our people dead.

To the anon who asked about the likely war between India and Pakistan, western leftists have already spoken through their little pro-Hamas terror cells (that are allegedly activist groups), and loudly. They've gone full tilt into supporting the Islamist terrorists who carried out the attack where they hunted down Hindus visiting Hindu sites. They're already being intensely hinduphobic. They're calling the slaughter 'decolonial' and 'freedom fighting brought on by the Indian occupation of the indigenous lands [of the Islamists]' and are calling India and Indians all the same things they call Israel and Israelis.

Kashmir is absolutely already being painted as Gaza 2.0 and they're on the same side they've been on the whole time. They did it as quickly and as callously as they did during October 7th.

Thank you for the info and honestly, I’m dismayed but can’t say I’m really surprised.

Mere pure khandaan me mujhse bada procrastinator kabhi paida hi nhi hua

Pakistan admits to it’s role in the Pulwama terror attack. Calls it “tactical brilliance”.

They’re completely mask off now, any Pakistani who hereafter tries to deny, gaslight and lie about Pakistan’s role in terrorism on Indian soil is admitting to being an accomplice to this terrorist state’s crimes.

New development.

It is highly likely that Pakistan agreed to de-escalation and ceasefire due to pressure by China and USA. India taking down multiple F-16 among others may have put USA in China in a very awkward position

This was an overall win for India as India took down their air bases and bunch of terrorists. it is likely that Pakistan may break the ceasefire again or try to commit another terror attack in Indian territory. India has already announced that any further terror attacks in Indian territory will be considered an act of war.

Pakistan is directly targeting civilians in India.

Fuck Pakistan.

Kashmir, Pahalgam.

The terrorists checked for their IDs, their Hinduness before shooting them.

I have been thinking about this and realised that we don't actually have a deva or devi for beauty. People think it is Mata Lakshmi but it's not true. None of her Ashtalakshmi forms also have her represent beauty. Mata

The sibling pairs have different skin colours — Vishnu-Parvati are dark skinned, Shiv-Saraswati are fair skinned, Brahma-Lakshmi are golden skinned — and all of them are called beautiful.

So where does this concept of beauty even come from? That fair is beautiful and dark skinned is not? Does it come from the west? From goddesses like Aphrodite, Venus or Freya? Or were they also made to represent beauty in the modern world to suit white people's beauty standards?

Ever since the launch of Op Sindoor in the earlier hours of this morning, I've been seeing people on social media accounts, making

statements like: "Question your morality, if you think those posts you made about Palestinian children are somehow different from Pakistani children dying."

"Understand that this isn't the only f""king way - yes get the terrorists, but I think we are advanced enough to avoid civilian casualties."

Let's start with the facts. India didn't bomb a city. We didn't target civilians. We carried out precision strikes on terrorist launch-pads, the very sites from where infiltrators are trained and dispatched to kill Indians. Comparing this to the Israel-Palestine conflict is not just ignorant, it's irresponsible. This is not a colonial occupation or a religious war, it's a defensive strike on proven terror infrastructure. If you can't understand the distinction, your so-called "morality" is deeply flawed. As for the "aren't we advanced enough to avoid civilian harm?" argument, we are. That's exactly why our strikes are surgical, intelligence-driven, and targeted. But let's not kid ourselves, war against terror is messy, especially when these terror groups use civilian areas as shields. The blame for any collateral damage lies with those who host and protect terrorists, not with the nation acting to defend its people.

We have dead bodies in our homes. We live with the aftermath of attacks every other month. We don't get the privilege of detached idealism while soldiers are returning in coffins. You can't lecture us on morality while sitting in the comfort of your safe city apartment.

But perhaps this reality won't hit you until it's your own blood on the floor, until you're attending funerals instead of Twitter debates.

So to those blindly echoing propaganda, stop being useful tools for the enemy. Stop framing national self-defense as brutality. This isn't just about geopolities, this is about survival. Start being an Indian, not just by name, but in spirit. Think critically and act in India's interest.