biblicallyaccurateslut
67 posts
Latest Posts by biblicallyaccurateslut
Every single person deserves shelter, food, water, and healthcare.
THIS IS WHAT YOU CAME FOR X GOLD RUSH LIL HOMIE GAYASS
Sooo, Bridgerton just came out (quite literally, with two Canon queer chatacters) and people are mad about it?? Like wtf??? Is 2024, get over it???
And they are saying they love the books so they dont want the storylines and shit changed. Mind you, the show has been changing the original storylines all the time, is an adaptation. Pretty sure the ones claiming to love the books have not even read them, but that is not relevant to the point I am trying to make.
What I am saying is that if you do not care about the series changing the history lines all the time, like they have been doing ALL OF THE SEASONS, ALL OF THE TIME, but you suddenly start to care -or hate- when a new history line (or a change of the story, like the Michael-Michaela one) only if it involves queer people, that is homophobic.
You only care when queer people are added. You only say its bad when queer people are represented. You only hate changes when queerness is involved.
THATS HOMOPHOBIA. Argue with the wall.
Reblog if you think a woman can be complete without children
Y’ALL HAVE TIME TO REBLOG THIS. IT TAKES LESS THAN FIVE SECONDS.
Reblog if you think it’s okay to platonically say “I Love You” to your friends
Not Karl..
"do you seriously think you're above the rules" the stupid ones yeah
Not socialist in a “I won’t have to work” type of way but socialist in a “I’ll still be working but I won’t be worried I won’t make the rent” type of way. In a “billions won’t be hoarded by one person” type of way. In a “janitors, fast-food workers, child care workers, preschool teachers, hotel clerks, personal care and home health aides, and grocery store cashiers, will live comfortably” type of way. In a “the sick and elderly will be cared for” type of way. In a “no child should work” type of way.
People saying the tortured poets department is somehow tied to Joe because of ONE word that coincides with Joe friends groupchat , but dismissing queer analysis of Taylor lyrics based on queer history and references and parallels that Taylor has done herself is wild to me.
We are all just guessing. Is just guessing. Hetlors are speculating as much as gaylors are.
The only difference is that gaylors get harrased because of that speculation
That album title is sooo gay
they’re about to start singing cool about it
If you're fifteen or older an still sleep with a stuffed animal please reblog this.
lesbians love and support our trans sisters 💖💖
reblog if you're a lover defender
Want to learn something new in 2022??
Absolute beginner adult ballet series (fabulous beginning teacher)
40 piano lessons for beginners (some of the best explanations for piano I’ve ever seen)
Excellent basic crochet video series
Basic knitting (probably the best how to knit video out there)
Pre-Free Figure Skate Levels A-D guides and practice activities (each video builds up with exercises to the actual moves!)
How to draw character faces video (very funny, surprisingly instructive?)
Another drawing character faces video
Literally my favorite art pose hack
Tutorial of how to make a whole ass Stardew Valley esque farming game in Gamemaker Studios 2??
Introduction to flying small aircrafts
French/Dutch/Fishtail braiding
Playing the guitar for beginners (well paced and excellent instructor)
Playing the violin for beginners (really good practical tips mixed in)
Color theory in digital art (not of the children’s hospital variety)
Retake classes you hated but now there’s zero stakes:
Calculus 1 (full semester class)
Learn basic statistics (free textbook)
Introduction to college physics (free textbook)
Introduction to accounting (free textbook)
Learn a language:
Ancient Greek
Latin
Spanish
German
Japanese (grammar guide) (for dummies)
French
Russian (pretty good cyrillic guide!)
Want to learn something new in 2022??
Absolute beginner adult ballet series (fabulous beginning teacher)
40 piano lessons for beginners (some of the best explanations for piano I’ve ever seen)
Excellent basic crochet video series
Basic knitting (probably the best how to knit video out there)
Pre-Free Figure Skate Levels A-D guides and practice activities (each video builds up with exercises to the actual moves!)
How to draw character faces video (very funny, surprisingly instructive?)
Another drawing character faces video
Literally my favorite art pose hack
Tutorial of how to make a whole ass Stardew Valley esque farming game in Gamemaker Studios 2??
Introduction to flying small aircrafts
French/Dutch/Fishtail braiding
Playing the guitar for beginners (well paced and excellent instructor)
Playing the violin for beginners (really good practical tips mixed in)
Color theory in digital art (not of the children’s hospital variety)
Retake classes you hated but now there’s zero stakes:
Calculus 1 (full semester class)
Learn basic statistics (free textbook)
Introduction to college physics (free textbook)
Introduction to accounting (free textbook)
Learn a language:
Ancient Greek
Latin
Spanish
German
Japanese (grammar guide) (for dummies)
French
Russian (pretty good cyrillic guide!)
What’s really shitty about this new article is that anyone remotely connected to Taylor can claim they’re her associate. Travis and his team can be the source for the article, and they know that the general public will take it as the gospel truth and assume an associate means Taylor’s team itself. But it doesn’t.
The problem is that if anyone can be an associate, it’s not technically a lie.
One of Taylor’s associates has a problem with the article, and that can’t be disproven. And that associate likely wants to make it look like Taylor is the one with the problem—to keep her looking straight. For their own agenda.
I can think of a couple parties that could be responsible, but my eye is mainly on Travis.
Sooo, I just read a post saying that gaylors are disgusting because they want to force Taylor out of the closet?? And that NYT should not have posted that article???
Let me get something clear, if you are closeted, you try and hide your queernes as much as you can. You dont go around singing about your agumentative, antithetical dream girl and wearing someone like a necklace. You dont talk about hairpin drops. You dont dress yourself in the bi pride flag colors and sing about wanting boys and girls. Is not something you do if you are closeted.
Forcing someone out of the closet is disgunting, thats for sure, the thing were this person is wrong is that we are not trying to force Taylor out of the closet. Forcing her would be something she does not agree on but since she has been putting all the queercoding and queer slang in her music (out there to listen and analize by everyone) and decide to do some things queer people use to identify each other and send signals in public, aware she is being watched by the whole world, I would argue that the talking about her probably being queer is consented by her.
Also, saying she is in a closet would mean she is secretive about it and trying to pass as straight, which I think I gave you enough examples as to why she is not secretive about it. Is out there to see. And because is out there to see, it is okay to talk about it. She put it out there. The NYT only talked about queercoding in her music, which is completely fine to talk to. She wrote that music and she released it. She filmed that videos. Chose that words. She is in control and she decided to leave hairpin drops as often as she could. The NYT was not outing her or anything, it was just doing a reading of a piece of art using certain simbology, that happens to be the queer one. And if we think about how the art and the artist are connected, is fair enough to wonder if she could be attracted to woman. She hints at it in her music!
Obviously
Currently watching the Swiftologist reaction to the "Look what we made Taylor Swift do" article and I have to stop it and say something:
TAYLOR SWIFT HAS NOT STATED NOTHING IN THE MATTERS OF HER SEXUALITY
In the first few minutes he was already spreading missinformation, saying that Taylor has, in multiple times, said that she is straight. She has never done that. This really would not bother me so much if he did not went on about how gaylors use false information for our "conspiracy theories".
Excuse me, but queerflaging and queercoding is a thing that has been going on for as long as queer people have existed. One might think that being part of our community he would know that, but apparently, he does not. This is what queer people not knowing about the history of their own community does, this is why we need conversations about flagging and queerness to be open. We should be taught about it, it is part of human history after all, an important part of it. If you doubt it, just take a look at almost every important figure on history, they were most likely queer and it affected their life and how they shaped the world. Queerflagging is part of history, not a conspiracy theory.
Talking about conspiracy theories, we could say saying she is straight is as well a conspiracy theory if we are going to say gaylor is one. I mean, she has remained unlabled about her sexuality to the public, so is only fair to assume that she could be attracted to any gender as far as we know.
Gaylors dont claim to know Taylors sexual orientation. Hetlors are the one hyperfixated on her straightness and sexuality. Gaylor reads the work of Taylor Swift through queer lenses with the propouse of relating to her music in a deeper level. Hetlors claim she is straight even if she has not say that before and punish any other idea that diverse from that even if, as far as we know, that idea could be wrong.
Of course Taylor Swift is straight. Is totally straight to dress up as Sappho and hide in a glass closet to sing in the MV of the first track of your really queer album where you sing "thats my man" so many times that is just campy and ridculous considering how queercoded that lyrics are. Those gaylors are just taking it too far.
Sooo... i been trying to tag people in the post, but turns put I dont know how to do that so... A big hug to everyone (mutual or not). Thank you for making tumblr such a safe and fun space. I hope you have a nice day.
This is the Tumblr hug 🫂🤍 Please pass it on to 5 mutuals to brighten someone’s day!
@yourlocalbreadenthusiast @edendahsnek @m3ll0m0chi @bbsundae @cyberixaa @kittydragondraws @jinxedtext
And lastly, @sk3tchyy42 , youuuuuu
(I probably did miss some mutuals, MUTUALS OR NOT COME HERE FOR A HUG)
If you disagree, get the fuck out. Male victims are as valid as female victims. We all should care.
Just an experiment. Reblog if you actually give a fuck about male victims of domestic violence and rape.
Of fucking course
What sick bastard doesn’t
Hits diferent (HD) and I dont wanna live forever (IDWLF) might as well just be the same song separated in two.
Both of them have the same themes and imaginary. Both are about a girl deeply heartbroken that tries to party away the pain of the break up and then cries when it doesnt work.
Now, being stated that, we know that the songs on the midnight album are song that Taylor write in different times of her life, and noticing the similarities between HD and IDWLF, it only makes sense to think they were written at the exact same time, about the same situation and muse.
I know that IDWLF is a song for a film, but it can still apply to Taylors life and sitution, since she has stated that she writes from a personal experience. Maybe the song was intended to fit the plot of the movie but she probably took some of her own felings and experiences and putted them into it.
Also, both of them fit the narrative of 1989. She was out and about, partying eith the girlies and all the stuff and she was also heartbroken (like she stated in the vault tracks).
Now, I am about to dive into swifgron, so if you dont like it, I suggest you to stop reading now.
Taylor posted this video:
She made sure we wached the bunny. She even looked at the screen (with 0 discrepcion, may I add) to make sure it was there. You know whos nickname was bunny, you are right, Dianna Agron.
For the propose of this theory, I will take that as a confirmation that IDWLF is about Dianna (if people can make the case for ATW being about Jake because of a scarf or all 1989 about Harry for a few pap pictures, I guess we will have no problem making the case for Dianna and IDWLF based on that video).
Then, if IDWLF is basically the same song as HD (based on the parallels of their lyrics and all the stuff I pointed before) and if IDWLF muse is Dianna Agron then we could that Hits different is about Dianna Agron.
Thats it. Thats all I have to say today.
Disclaimer: this is just my interpretation and by sharing this I am not saying this is the truth or that Taylor said that to me or something like that. I am just reading and analising the art and content she putted out there.
Reblog to have the most homoerotic year of your life 2024