...
The primary issue within the atheistic community, when debating with those who hold a biblical worldview, is that the atheist claims logic, science and reason to be the basis of their claims while also failing to follow their guidelines of debate. There are many issues within a...
Para 'rita Martha wherever she may be. Salud!
"condemned by the Catholic Church for allowing ordinary people to read the Bible for themselves." .......riiight, exactly.
"seeing the kid smile eats away at my precious cynicism" ~ anon
Nick Knight - Body Language (2010)
Be a true representative of the goodness in your heart, and don’t expect it to be easy or even noticed.
Adyashanti (via lazyyogi)
To understand meditation in a nutshell, go get a camera and take two pictures of the same thing.
For the first, hold your camera as still as possible, and take a picture.
For the second, shake your camera back and forth as fast as you can while you snap the photo.
The difference between...
You’re constantly on my mind and my hands can’t stop thinking about you.
Michael Faudet (via michaelfaudet)
💘
anyway… ***there is no truth in words***
behold your final paradox.
….ok, so final paradox is a bit dramatic. i would like to forward a clear intent here though, which is to bind some of the ideas that have brought me here together into a nice tidy package. i submit that through cultivated awareness, language modification, and mutual trust we will alter the present course of (our)story to much more compassionate means.
...complicate such as "you" see fit with regards to your your particular level of consciousness.
***what we call a map is actually the territory relating to itself (recursively).***
(edit...there is no truth to behold other than ....? the eternal nature of consciousness?)
"Between the two poles of expression and suppression lies a third option ....mere observation." ~ anonymous Photography by Aya Trevino
Christianity is hilarious (with the appropriate and properly applied secular attitude), and if you dig around enough….pretty fucking ironic!
"At the Synod of Dort, both sides agreed that the atonement of Christ’s death was sufficient to pay for all sin and that it was only efficacious for some (it only actually saved some). The controversy centered on whether this limited efficacy was based on God’s election (the view of the Synod and of later Reformed theologians) or on the choice of each person and God’s foreknowledge of that choice (the view of Arminius)."
...its never really over...... A kingdom, for a kiss upon my shoulder... ~d(。ŏ__ŏ)b~
89 posts