💚💜💖

The fact that Crowley listens to Queen added years to my life.

Spoiler thought on ' I care a lot':

Marla Grayson is an intelligent, ballsy, determined, charming, 4-steps ahead kind of person. She knows the law around elderly care very well and she uses that to her advantage. She is ruthless because she has been burned before in this game of being rich and powerful. She has the right amount of recklessness to take risks and she doesn't care or think that heaven and hell exists or there is something after death. She obviously has selective empathy because even though she abuses elder people she cares about her girlfriend, her employee, and her doctor friend who is killed.

Here is the thing.There are movies like these with male white protagonists all over hollywood. Its a very American and very capitalistic movie. While I like her abilities and the way she uses her skill set and Rosamund Pike does a very good job, she uses it in an immoral and unethical context. She is a bad person who simply happens to be a lesbian. Anyone can be a bad person, even minorities. So its not right to root for her and it makes sense that she is killed the way that she does (although I do admit she shouldn't have been shot by that misogynistic piece of crap who threatened to rape her, it sends a bad message.)

It doesn't have a msg per say, I guess the only thing I took away is that American legal system is so crappy that anyone can tale advantage of it and capitalism is ruining everything there.Oh and yeah be somewhat like Marla Grayson in a moral, ethical context. And maybe get her wardrobe.

Its just another movie. A popcorn watch if you will.

I love his face when he gives her the cat.

Baby doll, when it comes to a lover

I promise that you’ll never find another like

I want to know what test group saw the official logo and went " this is gonna hype em up".

Well... 🤷🏻‍♀️

"your drug of choice?" "This" she answered,sniffing the pages of the book.

darkcoco

He looks like the old version of the villain in The Incredibles.

Those anyone have a link to the full interview? It's from Watch what happens live with Andy Cohen.

"It's a good thing dreams change or else the world would be full of cowboys and princesses."

Stephen Colbert at a graduation speech In Northwestern University ( I am paraphrasing and the university might not be right..)

HI 🙋 guys ! I want to give a big thumbs up and lots of hi-5s to all the peeps who have been bitch enough to follow me.After all "Great bitches follow alike" The Spn fandom has been so good to me and welcomed me in their familia * gonna effing cry cause am so touched* THANK YOU ALLL!!!! Keep on doing the good job and follow me cause am coming up with xciting ideas to keep u interested and ....even if I don't u will still follow me okay? Hail Misha!

Wow. You guys stop it. Stop blowing my mind okay am not ready for this.

Eurus = emotion

Eurus is Sherlock’s emotional side. She is sentiment itself.

Mycroft is the one responsible for imprisoning her. At a textual level this makes no sense. But if Eurus is emotion then it makes perfect sense. Sherlock started to imitate Mycroft’s own attitude to emotion, locking his emotional side in a fortress and then forgetting all about it.

Eurus has superpowers. She can make people do things just by talking with them. Again this makes no sense at the textual level. What makes us do things we don’t want to do on a rational level? Emotion. Emotions are motivators. People do things because of sentiment all the time.

Although locked in a fortress she escapes with ease. Yet she returns too. This makes no sense textually. But as subtext, she is Sherlock’s emotions locked inside him and yet his emotions escape regularly leaking all over the place.

John has an affair with Eurus. There is a romance between John and Sherlock’s emotional side.

Eurus is John’s therapist. Sherlock’s emotional side heals John.

Eurus plays the violin too. In fact, she taught him. At a textual level it makes no sense but subtextually, emotion is necessary to music.

Eurus plays the role of the daughter to the killer.Does Sherlock himself fear that he will kill one day because his emotions are that powerful? Or is she only playing that role as it is a conversation Sherlock is having with himself about the case?

Moriarty visits Eurus. Moriarty has always understood Sherlock’s emotional side. He sees beneath the mask that Sherlock wears.

Eurus is suicidal but Sherlock talks her out of it. Sherlock’s emotional side is suicidal but his rational side stops himself.

Eurus puts Sherlock through tortuous mind games. Doesn’t emotion do the exact same thing?

Sherringford is the original name for Sherlock. He started whole, rationality and emotions both.

Eurus killed Redbeard/Victor and then Eurus was taken away by Mycroft. That’s the textual level. But what does it mean? Was Sherlock accidentally responsible for someone’s death while caught up with his emotions? Or perhaps he simply blames himself? Or is the death symbolic? Did he fall in love with Victor as a child and revealing his true feelings destroyed the friendship?

The final problem then is reason vs sentiment. How do we live with emotions? Should we lock them up as Mycroft recommends? Sherlock has tried this and it didn’t work. So what’s Sherlock’s solution in the end? He lives with her. He accepts her. He becomes whole again. Reason and sentiment.

Tagging @sherlock-overflow-error and @sarahthecoat for cataloguing purposes.

What color?

this is the funniest twitter thread i’ve ever seen in my goddamn life