India Did It Again. Their Cowardice Is Out Of This World. Targeting A Mosque? That Too In The Dead Of

Humare prabhu Shri Ram ji Mata Sita ji ke swayamvar me

There is just a good bunch of songs and folk songs in awadhi dedicated to this particular event in Ramayan.

Sri Rama and Sita

A Durga Mata temple at Manali Mall Road

It was strange no one was visiting this temple on a Friday (I visited this on the 7th of Feb)

I love the little art on the golden plated doors of this temple. I can make out a few from this picture too.

if you get this, answer with 3 random facts about yourself and send it to the last 7 blogs in your notifications, anonymously or not! Let's get to know the person behind the blog. :)

1. I spent the Covid lockdown learning how to make homemade pasta 🍝 (but wish I had just started a tiktok😂)

2. My favourite season is summer 🌞 (but climate change is ruining it and I blame the rich and the greedy for it)

3. I love writing. I have been working on something since 2021 and so far I've only written 10 chapters🥲 (but the story is beautiful and deserves to be put out there for everyone to read)

|| ॐ नमः पार्वतीपतये

हर हर महादेव ||

Stone carvings at Kailash Temple, Ellora Caves, Maharashtra.

Went here last year after visiting Ghrishneshwar Mahadev.

You shouldn't expect a reward for something that is expected of you.

Just like when you're a parent, you are expected to support your kid, give them a good upbringing. You shouldn't expect rewards in return. The same goes for feminism. If you think your feminist views deserve a clap or a pat on the back, choose a better reason.

men lose their masculinity (the social reward for correctly performed manhood) through advocating for, sympathizing with, or doing labor that is allocated to women.

(and I'm not talking about some innate, spiritual, or psychological masculinity. I mean social masculinity--being regarded by higher ranking men as masculine.)

you genuinely do lose your current standing if you meaningfully and consistently object to the economic, legal, and interpersonal status of women, especially in ways that implicate men around you.

many men believe that if they are willing to do this, occasionally, then they are owed a recuperation of their masculinity through some other means.

if they are sacrificing masculinity through advocating for women politically, then they expect to bolster their masculinity through receiving expressions of gratitude and adoration by women ("feminist men are so hot" "consent is sexy" "pro-choice men get laid more" etc.) or they expect to bolster their masculinity through emasculating other men by asserting the standards of masculinity they adhere to are the "real" masculinity ("real men support women" "sexists are immature boys, I'm a man" "I'm secure in my masculinity and they're insecure" etc.)

to dismantle patriarchy, you need to be able to advocate for women even when it means losing gendered status. other men mostly will not respect you, and many misogynist women will not respect you either. it might not get you laid or praised or validated. in fact, it will probably subject you to increased scrutiny and criticism (because feminized subjects are always subject to such, and if you lose social masculinity, you too will experience this to some degree).

will you still advocate for women even if there is no social benefit and only social cost? do you have principles, or do you just want the fantasy of being a benevolent ruler?

What makes you think the OP doesn't know their facts. They do know the history and they know who's in the wrong. It's just that they don't want to create a narrative where whoever is against them is wrong. And whoever they're supporting is in the right.

i’m reading these news as there’s a siren absolutely BLASTING outside my window because russia’s bombing my city again. this goes to say i’m showing solidarity with pakistan and reminding you that THE INVADERS ARE ALWAYS WRONG

So trans women putting on makeup and jewellery is good. But Hindu women doing the same is bad. Isn't feminism about choices?? Talk about double standards.

And just like there are women about whom there's nothing divine, there are men who have no divinity about them. And they're the rapist, the misogynist, the अधर्मी. The ones who push people away from their dharma. And by dharma I mean duties not religion.

I'm sorry but you're just a misogynist. It's like when women call other women bad feminists because they married and had a baby early or because a woman decided to settle for traditional gender roles.

And okay I get it now, you're talking about the imbalance in beauty standards, I can totally agree on that. Hindus have no strict beauty standards though. We have gods with fair skin and dark skin. And they adorn themselves the same way. Mata Kali is a married feminine energy, we see her wear all sorts of shringar, plus a garland of skulls. Her divine spouse Mahadev, adorns his body with bhasma, snakes and also wears a garland of skulls. And they're both revered in Hinduism.

And at the same time, we have feminine energies like Mata Anusuya who was seen above the Tridevi. And she was a rishika. She didn't wear these fancy jewelleries. So maybe take a minute to think about whether you have a problem with jewellery or Hinduism.

Hindu traditions and festivals just enslave women and reinforce patriarchal practices, karwa chauth for example, a festival where a married woman has to fast and stay famished for whole 24 hours, NO water and food and some of them don’t even swallow their own saliva and why? for the long life and well being of her husband. Husbands are placed on a pedestal in hinduism, he is more revered than god sometimes while reducing women to obedient and self sacrificing caretakers . It reinforces the idea that a woman’s purpose revolves around a man’s needs, his health, his happiness, his survival while her own identity and agency is considered as irrelevant. In this religion women’s existence will always be tied to men and are expected to embrace such misogynistic ideals or else she’ll be labelled as a “too westernised housewife” or other names they love calling when you go against the system

For humanity’s sake, stop siding with abusers!

Just like they entered Mumbai and attacked on 26/11

Ever since I posted about India's attack on Pakistan, my replies have been flooding with people coming ton defend India. so this is for all of you.

firstly, let me start off by saying that I do condemn the Phalgam attacks and believe that it was an act of insanity and cowardice done by mentally deranged individuals who think that killing innocent people based on their religious beliefs is Islam. I can assure you, it most decidedly is not. Islam tells us to fight only those who are fighting us, hence, the only form of fighting allowed in Islam is self defense. So, whatever those individuals did in the name of Islam was a contortion of what the religion is all about.

Now, coming on to what India did, and how the people in my replies are tripping over themselves to defend it.

On may 7th 2025, India launched a series of missile attacks on Pakistan, hitting the cities of Bhawalpur, Muzzaffarbad, and others, targeting mosques and civilian areas in the dead of night. This attack took the life of an innocent child, and two civilians.

their reasoning for this attack? Pakistan organized the Kashmir attack, and the mosques targeted were housing terrorists. Firstly, HOW THE FUCK DID INDIA'S SECURITY DROP SO LOW ON THE LINE OF CONTROL THAT "PAKISTANI" TERRORISTS WERE ABLE TO CREEP IN?

And secondly, if India is so fucking sure that it was Pakistani Terrorists, WHERE THE FUCK IS THE PROOF THAT THEY ASKED FOR? WHERE THE FUCK IS THE INVESTIGATION THAT PAKISTAN ASKED FOR? HOW THE FUCK DID INDIA KNOW IN LITERAL FIVE MINUTES THAT IT WAS PAKISTAN?

Everything about this screams an unfounded and utterly baseless claim that Pakistan is housing Kashmiri terrorists.

But coming back to causalities, where, if I may remind you, were not terrorists found. There was not a single piece of evidence that proves the housing, or even the existence of terrorists in those civilian areas.

The only thing that those attacks achieved was that they proved the inhumane nature of the Indian civilians. All night on twitter, the Indian side was up in arms, loudly and boldly celebrating the death of a child.

This is exactly what Israel did in Palestine. They claimed that places in Gaza were terrorist bases, and the leveled the entire city. They said that there was a terror base under AL Shifa hospital and bombed it. And guess what? THEY DID NOT FIND A SINGLE TERRORIST UNDER THE HOSPITAL. They said that there was a terror base in the elementary school. they bombed it to ashes. and guess what? THERE WAS ALSO NOT A SINGLE A TERRORIST IN THE SCHOOL, JUST INNOCENT CHILDREN. Now, the entire city is leveled, not a single building left standing.

That is what India plans to do with Pakistan. And we will not let that happen.

If only we had the original manuscripts and texts, we'd be able to answer these questions. A lot of things get lost in translation, sadly ofcourse.

Reading is such a journey cz sometimes you know what you're reading and the story has a base but sometimes it's just mahabharat and you can do nothing about it.

literally sat down with clenched teeth and had to calm down myself after I started reading Sambhava Parva.

I've read until Arjun's birth if anyone's wondering

My thoughts until now:

Shakuntala deserved better.

no way you just said that

yes wayy you just said that! Slayyy

Ok so I was cheering on the wrong side apparently

So then Devyani was the earliest sister-zoned lady

Devyani is such a papa ki pari.

Sharmistha— girl— that's not how it's supposed to work and we all know it.

Brother find a therapist— wait did they have therapists back then?

It can't be that bad???

Oh it is sO BAD!— who allowed this?

I have absolutely zero idea if that's how it's supposed to work.

And what about that one time you lied to Devyani sir?mmmmmmmm sus

BHISHMA NO

BHISHMA YES

bhisma wait— what are you TALKING ABOUT!?

Satyavati what shampoo dyu use gurl— snatched an entire king

Me killed Myself kinda situation ngl

Hmmm earliest teenager guy.

oh he dies right

Yeah he died

Who is making these rules ohmygod

BLUER EYES HYPNOTISE TERI—

red heads? back then? is this mahabharat?

no way you just said that

no wait they seriously had blue eyes?

Wait no what

When i asked who was making these rules i didn't expect an answer sir

Oh wait so like this existed!?

I don't know whose side I'm on now so I'll just wait it out until krishna pops up and has arjun kill yall

The amount of things that make no sense whatsoever

Lmao Vikrodara and Duryodhan born on the same day twinsies

Aint no way a child cracked a mountin tho

No wait thats bheem were talking abt

Arjun was born the main character

Im dying

Wait— they mentioned a guy before but his name aint here

Aaaand he pops back here somehow...