I’m scared...but I’m ready for it to happen.
So they killed the Night King off in one episode with minimal deaths. That’s not what ANYONE expected.
Now we’re gearing up towards the “final battle” against Cersei. But Cersei isn’t nearly as scary as the Night King. And we have three episodes left. It’s improbable that Cersei fucking Lannister is worth more battle time than the Night King.
I just had the worst thought. Cersei isn’t going to get three episodes. She’s not the final battle.
The final battle is going to be Jon vs. Dany. The North is too loyal to Jon to kneel to Dany, and the Dothraki and Unsullied would never serve anyone other than their queen.
The final battle is going to be Jon Snow vs. Daenerys Targaryen and it’s going to have the biggest death toll we’ve ever seen.
After watching House of the Dragon, I’m not sure I’d want ANY of these characters on the throne.
Rhaenerya - I know we’re supposed to sympathize with her, but she keeps making terrible choices.
Aegon II - Nope. Just nope.
Daemon - He’s all about getting power, not about using it. Clearly not trustworthy. (Is he going to steal someone’s dragon? Is that why he sang to one of the dragons in the finale?)
Alicent & Otto - If these two worked as a team to support a better claimant than Aegon (ugh) I’d like them more, but they chose Aegon...clearly not a smart move.
Bran and Sam should have written A Song of Ice and Fire. Sam wrote the prose and Bran did all the research.
Bran should have been either King of the North, Master of Whispers (with his own army of literal little birds to replace Varys), or an advisor to the new king or queen of Westeros, not king himself.
‘Who has a better story than bran the broken?’ is blatant meera and jojen reed erasure (osha and hodor as well). Osha busted them out of winterfell, jojen showed up with his green dreams to guide them to the three eyed raven, and meera dragged his ass home after. The only thing bran managed to do is touch the night king and get a bunch of people killed (including the last living members of an entire species). Bran in general has very little agency in his own story. Jaime throws him out the window, robb leaves him in charge, theon takes the castle, the three eyed raven decides to train him. Even when he finally seems like he might actually do something in the battle with the dead, he just doesn’t.
I saw the point made that if the idea had been that the person with the most stories, that knows the most history, should be king, then this might work a little better. A 'those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it’ type thing. But as it stands, it’s such a ridiculously unsupported choice.
Jon Snow....King Beyond the Wall.
Sansa Stark.....Queen of the North.
Bran Stark....King of Westeros (um okay)
Arya Stark....Queen of this ship.
Maybe Arya will one day be the Queen of a fantasy version of America?
hi, sorry to be a bother, but i was wondering if u knew any alternatives to Philippa Gregory?? I really want to get into Tudor history and I love historical fiction but I've heard so much criticism of her work xx
Unfortunately a lot of period books are going to be steeped in a certain level of creative license which sacrifices historical details to the ideal or romanticised effect. Most major Tudor writers – Weir, Plaidy, Gregory - are guilty of this. Personally I can look past this and enjoy the content for its historical setting and loose interpretation, but if that is a deal breaker for you there are a slim number of authors who will likely appeal to you. If you are disinterested in Gregory, I would recommend Alison Weir and Jean Plaidy. Their novels are chock full in historical references and are of a similar style to Gregory. As I understand it their’s are more credible, the exception being Weir tends to take a biased standpoint, and Plaidy is more of a story-writer than she is a historian.
You’ve probably already heard of Hillary Mantel’s Wolf Hall series. I read its entirety and enjoyed it, but there are errors strewn through it. On the opposite end, Adrienne Dillard’s works tend to be more true to history and from what I’ve gathered the author herself is an all-around good person. I highly enjoyed The Raven’s Widow as opposed to Gregory’s interpretation to Jane Boleyn. Olivia Longueville is also a recommended author. Sharon Kay Penman, Ken Follett, Katharine Longshore, Diane Haeger, and Margaret George all have interesting and well-researched reads. I loved the Autobiography of Henry VIII by George. It reads fantastically.
I hope this helps! Enjoy your summer reading.
I feel like if I had to choose which Stark sister would kill Cersei, it would have to be Sansa. Including the relationship they shared, Sansa actually lost something to Cersei and that was Lady when she demanded Lady killed. In contrast Arya killing Cersei for Ned doesn't make sense because that was Joff. (Cersei wanted Ned sent to the NW) Unless people are referring to Robb and Cat which could work. But I would still choose Sansa because I think it would have more of an impact. *shrug*
Sansa would also be killing the person she once admired. It would definitely have a bigger emotion impact if it were Sansa. Arya was absolutely done wrong by Cersei but it wasn’t really a betrayal against Arya since she never had any positive feelings for Cersei. Sansa had the person she hoped to one day be turn out to be her abuser. It’s a more heartbreaking dynamic between Cersei and Sansa.
I get the feeling D&D really didn’t want Bran to be king, but did so because it was in George’s outline. Seeing how little Bran has done to be king (or deserve being king), they made Sansa Queen of the North because that at least makes more sense than King Bran.
Northern independence, and the people who keep defending it as an outcome on the show, continues to bother me. I like the idea of the breakup of the kingdoms in theory, but it should be a full dissolution. There is no point to the north becoming independent alone. If being part of a united realm is such horrible evil tyranny, then why isn't it horrible and evil for the remaining kingdoms? Why is it okay for them to be forced to kneel not only to a king but a Northern, and therefore foreign, monarch? Especially since at least two of them have a history of rejecting foreign rule.
And if things in the Six Kingdoms are actually going to be good and just and all that, then why is it necessary for the North to secede? They could just stay and be ruled over by the legal heir to House Stark and continue to reap the benefits of easy trade with the more winter-resistant kingdoms. The happiest years of Sansa's life were spent in a united realm, so what does she think this is going to give her? I'm pretty sure King Bran is how the books are supposed to end per GRRM, and my suspicion is that the showrunners wanted to upgrade Warden of the North Sansa to Queen Sansa in an attempt to dodge the accusations of misogyny naturally arising from the treatment of other female characters who aspired to rulership. This is empty pandering if I'm right, and I don't care for it.
m e l o d y / g l o u c e s t e r / p e g a s u s a mix for mary katherine blackwood
01.// goblin - suspiria (witch) 02.// joanna newsom - sprout and the bean (should we go outside? should we break some bread?) 03.// rasputina - gingerbread coffin (lay her down in her gingerbread coffin, when we need her she’ll rise to the light) 04.// jack off jill - my cat (my cat is crazy, he’s everything to me) 05.// evanescence - imaginary (I know well what lies beyond my sleeping refuge, the nightmare I’ve built my own world to escape) 06.// tennis - deep in the woods (consuming us fast, change is upon us) 07.// björk - hyperballad (I go through all this before you wake up, so I can feel happier, to be safe again with you) 08.// rasputina - signs of the zodiac (can you avoid what gave daddy his heart attack?) 09.// kate bush - get out of my house (this house knows all I have done) 10.// emilie autumn - cold (instrumental) 11.// karen o - the moon song (your shadow follows me all day, making sure that I’m okay, and we’re a million miles away)
8tracks
Letters sent and letters unsent…
THEON APPRECIATION WEEK
Prompt: Parallels
Theon and Sansa are seen as traitors, both to their own families and to the people who hold them hostage, even though their choices were completely compromised. Theon is seen as a traitor for choosing to be loyal to his own family by not sending the letter of warning to Robb. And Sansa is seen as a traitor for being forced to send the letter to Robb on behalf of her captors. The impossible choices they are forced to make are actually inverse parallels, but they earn them the same condemnation.