I'm Getting Kind Of Sick Of People Saying Things Like "you Have To Be Careful, Predators Are Masters

what gets me about the radfems on here with boyfriends/husbands/children is they had to deliberately let everyone know that. they could've easily just not mentioned it and we wouldn't have been none the wiser but nope. they couldn't help themselves and had to not make a personal blog but specifically post on their radfem blog about how they don't even remotely practice what they preach. yet do think they're so much smarter and more aware than all the normie women with male partners and kids. they don't just date and marry men- they make a point of thinking they're superior than women who dont.

Right? But these women have been pushed into het relationships their whole life and have had them rewarded and encouraged, so when some women do NOT do that, they're taken aback. Like when a kid goes to school and realizes that the world doesn't revolve around them like at home.

"The man who popularised bdsm was himself a serial rapist who tortured women and children" wait who is this? I mean checks out but I want to know

The S in BDSM comes from Sade, Le marquis de Sade. He was a french pedophile, rapist, torturer and kidnapper. He wrote about his methods, men loved it and intellectualized it and thus the Sadist movement was born and with it sado-masochism and bdsm and kink and all that revolting shit. His methods are exactly what bdsm proponents and porn addicts love. Rapeplay, bondage, whipping, hot wax, beating etc. Sadisme, Sadism, Sadismus, Sadismo, Sadizm, etc, in most languages the word for taking sexual pleasure out of torturing someone comes from Sade, who was a real man and a real criminal. It's a movement based on a serial rapist.

He started by raping prostituted women, some were so upset with his violence and perversity that they reported him to the authorities and that's when he got arrested first. He was released but put under surveillance, the inspector telling brothel owners to never let their girls go with this man.

Sade then met a poor woman who was a widow and a beggar. He offered her a position as housekeeper and took her to his house. He pretended to make her visit the house but in the bedroom he assaulted her, tied her to the bed, whipped her, poured hot wax on her wounds, threatened to kill her if she did not stop screaming, jerked off and then forced her to do blasphemous things because she was catholic and part of what he loved was making catholic women do things that are clearly against their religious teachings. She managed to escape through a window and ran to the village. He was imprisoned for 7 months.

Then during an orgy with some prostituted women and his valet, he drugged the girls and some of them felt sick and incapacitated. Him and his valet were condemned to death for the poisoning and for sodomy. But they escaped. Sade was from a bourgeois family, their money and influence helped him a lot. He was caught later but paid the prison guards and escaped once more.

After that, there were several cases in which he would hire servants who were almost always very young girls, children, and he raped them violently too. Turns out some of the girls had been kidnapped. They had marks on their bodies showing the abuse. The parents were looking for them. One father tried to shoot Sade but the gun misfired.

Sade was on the run again, went to Italy for a while, then went back to France. But his mother in law (yes, he was married this entire time) had been working really hard to get him arrested if he ever came back to Paris and that's what happened. But he was mostly accused of "libertinage" and "obscenity", making him a martyr to our modern liberals.

He was imprisoned for 11 years at La Bastille and was treated better than most prisoners because he was paying the staff for privileges. But in prison he was still violent, aggressive and he would write filthy and offensive letters to his mother in law and his wife, describing how he wanted to see them die. So he was not released early. He also wrote that for a man like him to become mentally healthy and to be treated fairly, he should be given access to girls in his cell.

That's when he started writing his pornographic books in which he pretends to be fighting for sexual freedom and against religious prudishness. He wrote novels illustrated with pictures and engravings of naked girls being raped, tortured and killed (yes killed, in gruesome ways) in much the same way BDSM photos and videos depict nowadays. But in some pictures he had little children drawn and participating in the orgies too.

During the French revolution, The Bastille was taken by the revolutionaries and the prisoners freed, unfortunately he was one of them. However, his books were perceived as horrible and concerning by the authorities, as something beyond simple obscenity, and he was placed in a mental institution, where he kept on writing his pseudo-intellectual garbage for a few more years before finally dying.

Years later, men got to read his books about torturing, raping and killing women and rehabilitated it. And now here we are. BDSM. The epitome of female empowerment.

I feel like a lot of liberals, especially the younger generation, don't really have any core beliefs other than "let everyone do as they please!" they're radical individualists. If something makes me happy, then it's good. If something makes them happy, then it's good because who am i to get in the way of someone else's happiness and freedom. No structural analysis. No attachment to anything other than individual personal fulfilment. Very spineless imo and antithetical to socialism and feminism.

I think about your post about women’s feminist views coming from a place of genuinely loving men a lot.

radfeminism in general comes from a place of wanting to reform men and convince them to be niceys because women cannot let go of their love for them and honestly genuinely truly want to be loved back. and the tryhard misandry comes from a place of hurt, the realization that men view them as subhuman even though they crave their affection, respect and attention like nothing else - while desperately wanting to be treated as an equal. this is why they willingly and readily abandon both when the right nigel comes along lol they think that their nigel is different and that they themselves are different because they're experiencing it firsthand and their experiences are real, unlike everyone else's. but that's to be expected in a hetero society, no amount of politics will ever keep women and men from each other

GenderCrit has got to be the most bland, boring and banal school of political thought I have ever seen. It literally requires no advanced research or skeptical thinking. That's why they attract thousands of followers because anyone and everyone can get on board with "the obvious". It requires no deep introspection, just going along with lifetimes of heterosexual preaching. It's just repetition of the heterosexual mantra and acceptance of their split-model of humanity. Imagine being this upset at other people's lessons and/or failures. Imagine ignoring the root of the rot and misdirecting your rage to this degree. Broken females and males are on their way out, so their followers can seethe and cope.

I honestly believe that women who are male-partnered/sexually active/ have kids/plans to have kids don't have much to say about trans people. Since a lot of arguments against trans people is the damage they cause to their bodies through sugeries and hormones (usually towards tifs) or that they're predators (towards tims) fall completely flat. These women do have a predator with them (their male partner), so why be upset over a male pretending to be female when you don't care about safety to begin with. Second, why can't tifs damage their bodies when you also damage your own body and mind through having sex and childbirth. You are a complete contradiction. You can't be against them and yet do the same as them just in different font.

-Anaïs Nin, 1939