"proving" Shifting Through Scientific Evidence (& Philosophic Theory)

"proving" shifting through scientific evidence (& philosophic theory)

this post is heavily inspired by @voldyateme on tiktok. i saw her video and decided to do research on my own, and write a detailed post about this topic to make myself understand better. i also would like to mention that some of the claims irene made in her tiktok were wrong (and biased) i also wanted to clear some things up for myself.

fyi: long post ahead. this took me three days to understand and write. i might still be a bit unclear on my understanding of some aspects, but to avoid having to write a whole novel on the subject, i simplified my findings and shortened them by a lot.

john clauser is a physicist who won the nobel peace prize in 2022 for his work on quantum entanglement. his theory confirms that quantum particles can be entangled across vast distances, and that their behaviors are instantly connected, even if they're light years apart.

a very simplified example:

i: you create two entangled particles

ii: you send particle A to tokyo, and particle B to paris

iii: a person in tokyo measures particle A and sees it spinning up, then instantly, meaning instantly, faster than light, the person in paris will know particle B is spinning down

this is simply based on particle A or B's observation, w/o there having to be sent any message or signal between them. they behave as if they're one system - not two separate ones.

the moment you measure one particle, you're instantly aware of the other particle's state.

⭒ relating quantum entanglement to shifting:

okay so now we know that entangled particles act as of they're one system, even through long distances. so, if everything was once connected to the big bang, then on some level, everything may still be entangled. meaning you, your consciousness and other "versions" of yourself in other realities.

this could therefore suggest that we are already connected to all possible versions of ourselves. they exist within a quantum field of potential, and our awareness can shift between these versions by tuning into the version we desire - essentially by choosing a different frequency.

say you're listening to the radio. you know that you’re able to listen to any radio broadcast because there are thousands playing at the same exact time, but you choose which one to listen to, knowing you have the choice to change it to another.

it's the same exact with shifting. you know that there are endless versions of you in existence right this moment - you only have to choose to become aware of your desired self.

john wheeler, another physicist, proved that reality is directly linked to our consciousness and what we observe. it's been demonstrated that particles don't move until they're actually observed. so if we're not observing something, it doesn't have a definite state at all. this is called the "observer effect"

the effect has challenged and in some ways helped disprove einstein's theory of realism. einstein believed that that the physical world exists independently of whether we observe it or not.

example: according to einstein, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to observe it, the tree still falls. this is shown to be false on a quantum level. that said, we can't w/ certainty say that the tree does (or doesn’t) exist if no one is perceiving it (confusing, trust me, i know)

wheeler also proved that particles will change their makeup based on our choices and observation. simplified, this means that reality doesn't fully decide its state until it's observed. it can have different outcomes, and our choices affect the past behavior of particles.

⭒ relating the observer effect to shifting:

we know that quantum particles don't take on a definite form or "reality" until they're observed. this implies that our observation plays a direct role in shaping reality - not just by watching, but also deciding. this implies that reality isn't fixed, but fluid, shaped by our decisions, thoughts and observations and means we can "choose" our reality.

quantum physics shows that reality isn't fixed until observed, observation and consciousness do play a key role and that multiple outcomes are possible. so our consciousness focus can be said to be the mechanism that "shifts" us into a desired timeline or reality.

way before quantum physics existed, george berkley, a philosopher in the 1700s argued the idea "to be is to be perceived", which is eerily similar to what scientists are exploring today.

he believed that physical objects don't exist independently of our own perception. so if no one is for example perceiving a tree, then it doesn't exist.

berkeley said that there is no such thing as matter existing on its own w/o a mind to perceive it. BUT! there's a twist. you see, berkley also argued the existence of God being necessary to explain how the world works within his theory of perception and idealism.

okay so, to simplify because it can be really confusing:

i: physical things only exist if they're being perceived.

ii: when humans aren't perceiving things, God is.

iii: the reason why the world keeps existing even when we're not looking is because God is always "watching".

this raises the question: if we're not perceiving something, and the only reason it exists because God is, then how do we know it actually exists when we're not perceiving it?

berkeley responded:

"we know it exists because we can come back and perceive it again, and it behaves consistently"

if you look at a tree, walk away, come back. it's still there. berkeley argued that you assume the tree existed the whole time because when you go back, the tree would still be there, at the exact same spot.

this consistency would therefore be explained by God's continuous perception of it. so even though you didn't perceive it the whole time, the fact that reality is orderly and consistent is reliable "proof" that something (God) kept it there.

critics have argued back that assuming God is perceiving all the time isn't proof that He actually is, so how would we know that?

the answer is: w/o God, things would just pop in and out of existence every time we blink and that doesn't happen. so God is used to explain why the world is consistent and stable even when we're not watching.

you can't personally perceive something that you're not perceiving, but you trust that it's still there when you go back there, because of God.

berkeley's theory is still relevant today because the things he imagined in the 1700s do line up w/ scientific discoveries today and i resonate w/ his theory, so i just had to include it even though God’s existence isn’t proven. it’s fascinating, really.

⭒ relating george’s idealism to reality shifting:

if. like berkeley said, things only exist when they're being perceived, and if reality stays consistent because someone is always perceiving it, then that means perception isn't just passive, it's creative and shapes what exists.

this ties back to shifting beacuse it suggests that your desired reality doesn't need to "appear" in front of you for it to be real - it only needs to be perceived. if you consciously focus on your dr, perceiving it in your mind as real, then by berkeley's logic, it is real, maybe not in the physical sense just yet, but within the field of awareness that gives rise to reality in the first place.

so basically: if reality is perception based, and you're perceiving your dr, then you're giving form to something that exists because you're actively perceiving it, and you are capable of being in that place.

𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓨𝓸𝓷𝓲 𝓐𝓷𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓼 & 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓽𝓼

𝓐𝓼𝓱𝔀𝓲𝓷𝓲, 𝓢𝓱𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐎

ɪɴᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰʀᴇᴇᴅᴏᴍ ɪꜱ ʜɪɢʜʟʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜɪɴ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʟɪꜰᴇ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴛɪᴇᴅ ᴅᴏᴡɴ ᴛᴏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍɪᴛᴍᴇɴᴛ-ᴘʜᴏʙᴇꜱ. ᴍɪꜱᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴄᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʟᴏᴡ ᴀᴛ ᴘʀᴏᴄᴇꜱꜱɪɴɢ ɪɴꜰᴏʀᴍᴀᴛɪᴏɴ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴇᴀɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛᴀʟʟ ʙᴜɪʟᴅꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʟᴏɴɢ ᴛʜɪᴄᴋ ʜᴀɪʀ. ᴍᴀᴊᴇꜱᴛɪᴄ ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛʏ. ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀʟᴋ, ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜰᴏᴏᴛꜱᴛᴇᴘꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴜꜱᴜᴀʟʟʏ ʜᴇᴀʀᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜱᴇᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ʀɪᴅɪɴɢ ᴘᴏꜱɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ (ᴍᴀʏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴏᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʜɪᴘꜱ ɪꜰʏᴡɪᴍ). ꜱᴇx ɪꜱ ʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ꜰᴀꜱᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ɪꜱ ᴜꜱᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ Qᴜɪᴄᴋʟʏ, ɴᴏᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ʟᴏᴛ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴛᴀᴍɪɴᴀ.

𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲, 𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓽𝓲 🐘

ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴘɪʀɪᴛᴜᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅɪꜱᴘʟᴀʏꜱ ᴀ Qᴜɪᴇᴛ ꜱᴛʀᴇɴɢᴛʜ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ʟᴏᴜᴅ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴄᴀɴ ᴅɪꜱᴛᴜʀʙ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴇᴀᴄᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʀᴇꜱᴘᴇᴄᴛ ʜᴜᴍɪʟɪᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴏɴᴇꜱᴛʏ. ᴀᴍᴀᴢɪɴɢ ᴍᴇᴍᴏʀʏ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴀᴄᴛᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴄʀᴀᴢʏ. ᴘʀᴏᴍɪɴᴇɴᴛ ᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ꜱᴛᴜʀᴅʏ ʙᴏᴅʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴀ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ, ꜰᴏᴄᴜꜱᴇᴅ ɢᴀᴢᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴜᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰᴇᴍᴀʟᴇ ᴇʟᴇᴘʜᴀɴᴛ ᴄᴀɴ ᴀᴄᴛ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴄᴏʏ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴅᴇᴄɪᴅɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴜʟʟʏ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ɪɴ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴠᴇʀʏ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴛɪᴛᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴇꜱɪʀᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴏɴ ᴀ ꜱᴏᴜʟ ʟᴇᴠᴇʟ. ᴛᴀɴᴛʀɪᴄ ꜱᴇx ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇꜱᴛ ᴡᴀʏ ᴛᴏ ᴇxᴘʟᴀɪɴ ɪᴛ.

𝓚𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓽𝓲𝓴𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓼𝓱𝔂𝓪 🐑

ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴛᴏɪᴄ ᴀɴᴅ ʀᴇꜱᴇʀᴠᴇᴅ ᴜᴘᴏɴ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ɪᴍᴘʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ, ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴀꜱ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀʀɪɴɢ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʀᴜʟᴇꜱ, ʙᴇʟɪᴇᴠɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴏɴᴇ ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ʀᴏʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴀʏ. ꜱᴇʟꜰ-ᴄᴏɴꜱᴄɪᴏᴜꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ɴᴏᴛ ɪɴꜱᴇᴄᴜʀᴇ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴊᴜꜱᴛ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇʟꜰ. ᴀɴᴅʀᴏɢʏɴᴏᴜꜱ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴋʀɪᴛᴛɪᴋᴀ ɪꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇʟʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴜꜱʜʏᴀ ɪꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɢᴇɴᴛʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ꜱᴇx ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀɴ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴍɪx ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴜᴀʟ. ɪɴᴛᴏ ʟᴇᴀᴠɪɴɢ ᴍᴀʀᴋꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴏʀ ʙᴇɪɴɢ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴅ, ꜱᴄʀᴀᴛᴄʜɪɴɢ, ᴅɪɢɢɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ɴᴀɪʟꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ʏᴏᴜʀ ꜱᴋɪɴ, ᴇᴛᴄ.

𝓡𝓸𝓱𝓲𝓷𝓲, 𝓜𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓲𝓻𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐍

ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴘʀɪᴠᴀᴛᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴇʀɢɪᴇꜱ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴇɴᴊᴏʏ ʟɪᴠɪɴɢ ᴄᴏᴍꜰᴏʀᴛᴀʙʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴀʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴍᴀᴛᴇʀɪᴀʟ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ꜱᴇᴇɴ ᴀꜱ ᴀᴇꜱᴛʜᴇᴛɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ ᴘʟᴇᴀꜱɪɴɢ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ᴡᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴡᴏʀᴅꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴋɴᴏᴡꜱ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴛɪᴄᴋʏ ꜱɪᴛᴜᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴡᴏʀᴅꜱ ᴄᴀɴ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ɪɴ ᴛʀᴏᴜʙʟᴇ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰʟɪʀᴛᴀᴛɪᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴛᴏxɪᴄᴀᴛɪɴɢ. ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛɪꜰᴜʟ ᴇʏᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴇʟɪᴄᴀᴛᴇ ꜰɪɢᴜʀᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ʀᴜꜱʜᴇᴅ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠɪʟʏ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ᴡʜᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇꜱ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏ ɪɴᴄʜ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴀɢᴀɪɴꜱᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ʀᴏᴘᴇ ʙᴜɴɴʏ ᴋɪɴᴋ. ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ᴡʀᴀᴘ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀʀᴍꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴇɢꜱ ᴛɪɢʜᴛʟʏ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ. ᴏɴᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴀᴋꜱʜᴀᴛʀᴀꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ɪɴ ʙᴅꜱᴍ (ʀᴏʜɪɴɪ ɪꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ) ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛɪᴠɪᴛʏ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴅᴏᴇꜱɴ'ᴛ ɪɴᴠᴏʟᴠᴇ ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄᴀʟ ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴀᴛ ᴀʟʟ.

𝓐𝓻𝓭𝓻𝓪, 𝓜𝓾𝓵𝓪 🐕

ʟᴏʏᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ɪɴᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴜᴀʟꜱ, ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴛᴏᴏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴄᴀɴᴅɪᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ꜱᴜɢᴇʀᴄᴏᴀᴛ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɪᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ɪᴛ ɪꜱ. ᴘʀᴏᴛᴇᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏᴡᴀʀᴅꜱ ᴛʜᴏꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ʜᴇꜱɪᴛᴀᴛᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴀ ʙᴜʟʟᴇᴛ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ʀᴜᴛʜʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ɪꜰ ʙᴇᴛʀᴀʏᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴀɴʏ ᴡᴀʏ. ᴡɪʟᴅ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛʀɪᴋɪɴɢ ᴇʏᴇꜱ. ʙᴇɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴀ ꜰᴏʀᴇꜱᴛ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʀʀᴏᴜɴᴅᴇᴅ ʙʏ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴍᴀᴋᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴀᴛ ᴇᴀꜱᴇ. ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʟɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ʀᴜʀᴀʟ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴛɪᴇꜱ ᴏʀ ʜᴏᴜꜱᴇꜱ ɴᴇᴀʀ ᴡᴏᴏᴅꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟʟʏ ʙᴏɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡɪʟʟ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴄʟɪɴɢʏ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀ ꜱᴇx, ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴜᴅᴅʟᴇ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀᴡᴀʀᴅꜱ. ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ɪꜱɴ'ᴛ ᴏɴ ᴘᴀʀ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴀɢɪᴛᴀᴛᴇᴅ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴏᴠɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀꜱꜱɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ɪɴ ʙᴇᴅ.

𝓟𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓾, 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐈‍⬛

ʟᴀɴɢᴜɪᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰɪɴɴɪᴄᴋʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄᴜʟᴀʀ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴡʜᴏ ʟᴇᴛ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴀꜱɪʟʏ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴅɪꜱᴛᴜʀʙᴇᴅ. ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴍᴏᴏᴅʏ ꜱᴏ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴄʟɪɴɢʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀꜰꜰᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏɴᴇ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴀꜱꜱʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀɴɴᴏʏᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇxᴛ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ. ᴄᴀɴ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀ ɪɴɴᴏᴄᴇɴᴛ ʏᴇᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴛʜᴀɴ ʏᴏᴜ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴜʙᴛʟʏ ᴍᴀɴɪᴘᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ. ᴀʟᴍᴏɴᴅ-ꜱʜᴀᴘᴇᴅ ᴇʏᴇꜱ, ꜱʟɪᴍ ɴᴏꜱᴇ, ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟ ʟɪᴘꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ'ꜱ ꜰᴇʟɪɴᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴀɪɴᴛʏ ɪɴ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀᴀɴᴄᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴡʜᴏ'ꜱ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇꜰᴜʟ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴʏ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴇᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴏꜰꜰ. ᴀꜱʜʟᴇꜱʜᴀ ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ʜᴀʀᴅᴇʀ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɪꜱꜱᴜᴇꜱ ʀᴇɢᴀʀᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟɪᴛʏ (ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴀʟᴇ ᴄᴀᴛ ʜᴀᴠɪɴɢ ᴀ ʙᴀʀʙᴇᴅ ᴘ*ɴɪꜱ). ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ᴅᴇꜱɪʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ᴀɴᴅ ʟɪᴋᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴄʜᴏᴋᴇᴅ. ᴘᴜɴᴀʀᴠᴀꜱᴜ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ʙʀᴀᴛᴛʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴡʜɪʟᴇ ᴀꜱʜʟᴇꜱʜᴀ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴀɴᴅᴀʀᴅ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ.

𝓜𝓪𝓰𝓱𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓟𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓲 🐀

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴠᴏʀᴀᴄɪᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴜᴀʟꜱ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴇʟꜰ-ᴄᴇɴᴛᴇʀᴇᴅ ʙᴜᴛ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴜɴᴄᴀʀɪɴɢ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴊᴜꜱᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴇɢᴏꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴘʀɪᴅᴇ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ꜱᴛᴏʟᴇɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴏᴛᴛᴇɴ ᴀᴡᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ɪᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ɪɴ ᴛᴇɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀᴀɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ʀᴇᴍᴀɪɴɪɴɢ ᴘʀᴇꜱᴇɴᴛᴀʙʟᴇ. ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴜᴛꜱɪᴅᴇ. ʙɪɢ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʜᴀᴜɢʜᴛʏ ɪᴍᴘʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ, ᴇꜰꜰᴏʀᴛʟᴇꜱꜱʟʏ ᴀᴛᴛʀᴀᴄᴛꜱ ᴀᴛᴛᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇɴ'ᴛ ᴀꜰʀᴀɪᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴛᴀʙᴏᴏ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʀᴀᴢɪᴇꜱᴛ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴋɪɴᴋꜱ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ʟᴏᴡ-ᴋᴇʏ ᴄᴏɴᴄᴇʀɴɪɴɢ. ᴇɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ꜱᴛᴀᴍɪɴᴀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʜᴀᴍᴇʟᴇꜱꜱ ɪɴ ʙᴇʜᴀᴠɪᴏʀ. ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴘʀᴀɪꜱᴇ ᴋɪɴᴋ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀᴛᴛᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴ ᴛɪᴄᴋʟᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴏᴜʟ.

𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓟𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓲, 𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓪 🐄

ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏɴꜱɪꜱᴛᴇɴᴛ, ɴᴏᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʀᴜꜱʜ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ᴛᴏ ᴡᴀɪᴛ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴀʀɪꜱᴇꜱ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʀɪɢʜᴛ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛ. ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅʀɪɴᴋ ᴍɪʟᴋ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰᴇʀᴛɪʟᴇ. ꜱᴇᴇɴ ᴀꜱ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴇʀꜰᴇᴄᴛ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴀʟ, ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ʀᴇꜱᴛɪɴɢ ʙʟᴀɴᴋ ꜰᴀᴄᴇ. ᴅɪꜰꜰɪᴄᴜʟᴛ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪɴ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟ. ꜱQᴜᴀʀɪꜱʜ ꜰᴀᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛᴇᴀᴅʏ ɢᴀᴢᴇ, ᴡᴇʟʟ-ꜰᴏʀᴍᴇᴅ ʙᴏᴅɪᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴀꜱɪʟʏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴘʀᴇɢɴᴀɴᴛ (ꜰᴏʀ ᴍᴇɴ, ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʟᴏᴀᴅꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠʏ) ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇ ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴍᴜʟᴛɪᴘʟᴇ ᴋɪᴅꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ɢᴇᴛ ᴍᴀᴅ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴘᴜꜱʜᴇᴅ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜱᴘᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴜᴘ. ᴍᴀʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴇꜱᴛ ᴀʀᴇᴀ. ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴠᴀɴɪʟʟᴀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱɪᴍᴘʟᴇ-ᴍɪɴᴅᴇᴅ.

𝓗𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓢𝔀𝓪𝓽𝓲 🐂

ᴛʜᴇ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴛᴜʙʙᴏʀɴ ʙᴜᴛ, ɪꜰ ʏᴏᴜ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʙᴜᴛᴛᴏɴꜱ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ɢᴇᴛ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ʀᴏᴡᴅʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠɪᴏʟᴇɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀɴɢᴇʀ ɪꜱ ɴᴏ ᴊᴏᴋᴇ. ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ʜᴀɴᴅ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ʀᴇꜱɪʟɪᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴇᴠᴇʀᴀɴᴄᴇ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ. ᴡᴀᴛᴇʀ ʀᴇᴘʟᴇɴɪꜱʜᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ꜱᴡᴇᴇᴛꜱ. ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ʙᴏʟᴅ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴏᴘᴇɴ ᴇʏᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡɪʟʟ ᴄᴏɴꜱɪꜱᴛᴇɴᴛʟʏ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜰɪɴᴀʟʟʏ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠᴀɴᴄᴇꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀʙɪʟɪᴛʏ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ɴᴏᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ, ɪᴛ ɪʀʀɪᴛᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ꜱᴀᴅɪꜱᴛɪᴄ ᴅᴏᴍꜱ.

𝓒𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓻𝓪, 𝓥𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓴𝓪 🐅

ᴏᴜᴛᴡᴀʀᴅʟʏ ᴄᴏɴꜰɪᴅᴇɴᴛ, ɪɴᴡᴀʀᴅʟʏ ɪɴꜱᴇᴄᴜʀᴇ. ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴘʀᴇꜱᴇɴᴄᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀɪɴᴛᴀɪɴ ᴀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴠɪʀᴏɴᴍᴇɴᴛ, ɪᴛ ᴋᴇᴇᴘꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱᴀɴᴇ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰᴀꜱʜɪᴏɴᴀʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏᴠᴇꜱ ᴊᴇᴡᴇʟʀʏ ᴏʀ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴀᴄᴄᴇꜱꜱᴏʀɪᴇꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ᴀ ʟᴏᴛ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴘɪɴɪᴏɴꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜰᴏᴏᴛ-ɪɴ-ᴍᴏᴜᴛʜ ᴅɪꜱᴇᴀꜱᴇ. ꜱʟɪɢʜᴛʟʏ ᴡɪʟᴅ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰɪᴇʀᴄᴇ ɢᴀᴢᴇ, ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ꜱᴍɪʟᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇᴀʟʟʏ ʀᴏᴄᴋ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ (ɪꜰ ʏᴋ ʏᴋ). ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴡʀᴇꜱᴛʟᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴏɴ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴇᴠᴇʀ ꜱᴛᴇᴘꜱ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏꜰ ʟɪɴᴇ (ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏᴍᴇɴ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴘᴘᴏꜱɪᴛᴇ). ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴᴇꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ʙᴇɪɴɢ ᴄᴀʟʟᴇᴅ ᴅᴀᴅᴅʏ/ᴍᴏᴍᴍʏ, ɪᴛ ʀᴇᴀʟʟʏ ꜰᴇᴇᴅꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟʟɪɴɢ, ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀꜱᴘᴇᴄᴛ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ᴘʀᴏɴᴇ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴄʜᴇᴀᴛᴇʀꜱ, ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ.

𝓐𝓷𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪, 𝓙𝔂𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓱𝓪 🦌

ᴇɴᴠɪʀᴏɴᴍᴇɴᴛᴀʟʟʏ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ, ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʟʟʏ ᴜɴᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ. ᴄᴀɴ ꜰɪɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ɪɴ ꜱɪᴛᴜᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴡʜᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ᴜꜱᴇᴅ ɪɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ᴡᴀʏ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ꜱᴏ ɢɪᴠɪɴɢ. ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ, ɴᴏ ᴍᴀᴛᴛᴇʀ ʜᴏᴡ ɪɴᴛɪᴍɪᴅᴀᴛɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀ. ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ꜰᴇᴇʟꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴏɴ ɢᴜᴀʀᴅ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛɪᴍᴇ. ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴜᴛꜱ ᴍᴜʟᴛɪᴘʟᴇ ᴡᴀʟʟꜱ ᴜᴘ, ᴍᴀᴋɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴅɪꜰꜰɪᴄᴜʟᴛ ᴛᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴠᴀɢᴜᴇ. ꜱʟᴇɴᴅᴇʀ ꜰᴀᴄᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴏᴇ ᴇʏᴇꜱ. ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴍᴀᴋᴇꜱ ʏᴏᴜ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴄʜᴀꜱᴇ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀ ᴛʜᴇᴍ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴋɪɴᴅ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴄᴀʀʏ ʜᴏᴡ ᴍᴜᴄʜ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ. ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ Qᴜɪᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴏʙꜱᴇʀᴠᴀɴᴛ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘᴜᴛ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴏʀᴡᴀʀᴅ ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀᴡʜᴇʟᴍɪɴɢ. ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴᴀʟɪᴛɪᴇꜱ ᴄᴀɴ ᴏᴠᴇʀᴡʜᴇʟᴍ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ʙᴇ ꜱᴏ Qᴜɪᴄᴋ ᴛᴏ ʀᴜɴ ᴀᴡᴀʏ ɪꜰ ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ. ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴇxᴘʟᴏʀᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ. ʙᴇɪɴɢ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ꜱᴏᴍᴇʜᴏᴡ ꜰᴇᴇʟꜱ ᴠɪᴏʟᴀᴛɪɴɢ ɪɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ᴡᴀʏ ꜱᴏ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ꜰᴏʀᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ. ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇꜱ ɪɴ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛɪᴠɪᴛʏ ᴏɴʟʏ ᴡʜᴇɴ ɪɴ ᴀ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘ, ʟᴇꜱꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ᴄʜᴇᴀᴛ (ᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅꜱ).

𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪, 𝓢𝓱𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓪 🐒

ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴏᴜᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴏᴘɪɴɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇᴅ, ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ʙᴏᴀꜱᴛꜰᴜʟ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜰᴜɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀᴀᴠᴇʟ ᴛᴏ ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴛ ᴘᴀʀᴛꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ, ɪᴛ ɢɪᴠᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴀ ᴄᴇʀᴛᴀɪɴ ʀᴜꜱʜ ᴏꜰ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ. ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ʟɪᴋᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴏᴠᴇ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ɪɴ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘꜱ ᴏʀ ᴏɴᴇ ᴀɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴ (ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ, ꜰᴀᴍɪʟʏ, ᴇᴛᴄ). ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴍɪꜱᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀɪᴄᴋʏ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴡɪᴛᴄʜ ᴜᴘ ᴏɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴏɴᴇ ɪɴꜱᴛᴀɴᴛʟʏ. ʟᴏɴɢ ꜰᴀᴄᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏɴɢ ʟɪᴍʙꜱ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰʟᴇxɪʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴇʀꜱᴀᴛɪʟᴇ (ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ ᴍᴀɴʏ ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴛ ᴘᴏꜱɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴋɴᴏᴡɴ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀɴ). ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴇxʜɪʙɪᴛɪᴏɴɪꜱᴛꜱ ᴀꜱ ᴡᴇʟʟ, ʙᴏᴛʜ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟʟʏ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟɪɢʜᴛ-ʜᴇᴀʀᴛᴇᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘʟᴀʏꜰᴜʟ, ᴍᴀʏ ᴄʀᴀᴄᴋ ᴊᴏᴋᴇꜱ ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀᴄᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋᴇᴇᴘ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀᴇꜱᴛɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇᴅʀᴏᴏᴍ.

𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪

ꜰᴀɪʀʟʏ ɪɴᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅᴇɴᴛ, ᴛʜɪɴᴋꜱ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰᴜᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ. ʙᴀᴛᴛʟᴇꜱ ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢ ʟᴏɴᴇʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢ ᴀʟᴏɴᴇ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ʀᴇᴠᴏʟᴜᴛɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ ᴍɪɴᴅꜱᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇᴇᴋꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ. ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅꜱʜɪᴘꜱ ᴄᴏᴍᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴏᴇꜱ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ɴᴏᴛʜɪɴɢ ʟᴀꜱᴛ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴠᴇʀ. ꜱᴍᴀʟʟ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ᴘʀᴏᴍɪɴᴇɴᴛ ᴊᴀᴡ. ᴛʜᴇ ᴜɴᴅᴇʀᴄᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴛʀᴇɴᴅꜱᴇᴛᴛᴇʀꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ꜱɪᴍᴘʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛʀᴀɪɢʜᴛ-ꜰᴏʀᴡᴀʀᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʟʟ ɢᴏ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ɪᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴅᴏ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴛᴏᴏ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ᴠᴀɴɪʟʟᴀ ɪɴ ʙᴇᴅ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ᴍɪᴅᴅʟᴇ ɢʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴛʜɪɴɢ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜱᴛʀɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴇᴀꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ɢᴏ ᴏᴠᴇʀʙᴏᴀʀᴅ. ᴜᴛᴛᴀʀᴀ ᴀꜱʜᴀᴅʜᴀꜱ (ᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ɢᴇɴᴅᴇʀ) ᴀʀᴇ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ.

𝓓𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓽𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓪 🦁

ʜᴜɢᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴᴀʟɪᴛɪᴇꜱ, ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ɴᴏᴛɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀʟᴋ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀ ʀᴏᴏᴍ. ᴄᴀʀʀɪᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴀꜱ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ʙᴏʀɴ ʀᴏʏᴀʟᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɪꜱ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ᴛʀᴇᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴀꜱ ꜱᴜᴄʜ. ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ-ʜᴜɴɢʀʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʟᴇᴛ ᴛʜɪꜱ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʜᴇᴀᴅꜱ ᴀᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ. ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜᴇʏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴍᴀᴅ, ʏᴏᴜ'ʟʟ ᴡɪꜱʜ ʏᴏᴜ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ꜱᴀɪᴅ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ᴘʟᴀᴄᴇ. ʟᴏɴɢ ᴀʙᴜɴᴅᴀɴᴛ ᴀᴍᴏᴜɴᴛꜱ ᴏꜰ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴏꜱᴛʟʏ ᴛᴀʟʟ ɪɴ ʜᴇɪɢʜᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʜᴜɢᴇ ꜰʀᴀᴍᴇꜱ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ɪɴ ᴀ ᴏᴠᴇʀʟʏ ᴄᴏɴꜱᴜᴍɪɴɢ ᴡᴀʏ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ʏᴏᴜ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀʟʏ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ ᴏʀ ᴠᴜʟɴᴇʀᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ (ᴛʜᴇʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴏɴᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜰʀᴇᴀᴋ). ᴅᴇꜰɪɴɪᴛᴇʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴛᴇᴇᴛᴇʀ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʀᴏʟᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ꜱᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ.

(I know y'all were waiting for this post for a bit but here it is :) I hope you enjoyed reading it and comment down below if anything resonates.)

759 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

Read somewhere, "Kabhi pathar ki thokar se bhi aati nahi kharash, kabhi ek zara si baat se insaan bikhar jata hai." damn so true.

38 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

8K notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

― Shifting through history ˚⋆

I am going to share with you (some) examples we can find regarding the existence of shifting throughout the ages, simply to show that it has always been a concept that has always existed.

― #01: The Theory of Ideas - Plato: The world we live in is only an imperfect copy of another more perfect and eternal world: the world of Ideas or Forms; everything we see and touch is only an imperfect version of its perfect Idea or Form, which exists on another plane. Our world is changeable and deceptive, while the world of Ideas is immutable and true - In both cases (this and shifting), there is an idea that our everyday perception is not the only way to understand what is ‘real’.

― #02: Dualism - Descartes: Best known for his method of doubt, where he questioned everything he couldn't be absolutely certain of — one of his biggest contributions was mind-body dualism, which argued that the mind (thinking, non-physical) and the body (material, physical) are separate substances. He believed that while the body operated like a machine following physical laws, the mind was something different—immaterial and not bound by space or time.

― #03: Buddhism - Anicca & Anatta: These 2 principles explain that: 1) everything is constantly changing, including the self, time, and the material world. There is no static "reality"—what we perceive is always shifting. And 2) the self is an illusion—a construct created by memories and thoughts.

― #04: Modal Realism - David K Lewis: American philosopher from the last half of the 20th century; his theory explains how all logically possible worlds are as real as our world (the real or actual world). Every decision, every event, every possibility exists somewhere in a parallel reality. These worlds are not just hypothetical or imaginary; they exist in the same way our universe does, just in separate dimensions.

― #05: Time traveler Party - Stephen Hawking: He experimented to test whether time traveling (aka, shifting) to the past was possible. He hosted this 'traveler's party' on June 28, 2009 — but he only sent out the invitations after the event had already happened. The idea was that if time travel were real, someone from the future would see the invitation and travel back in time to attend.

― #06: Syntergic Theory - Jacobo Grinberg: If you've been in the shifting community for some time now, you already know him: a neuroscientist and psychologist known for researching on consciousness, the brain, and mystical experiences. His theory suggested that the brain doesn’t just perceive reality, but actively constructs it by interacting with a universal holographic energy field (which contained all information, and mystical experiences like telepathy could be explained by tuning into different parts of it). Mysteriously, he disappeared in 1994, after his theory gained popularity.

― I have presented shifting through philosophers, religions, scientists, and intellectuals' viewpoints, you still believe that shifting is impossible...?

898 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

⌇ᝰ How i manifested my sp in one day.

I just visualized and affirmed. Literally, just it.

It was easier than I originally thought. One night I did a script of him! I didn't necessarily manifest from 0, I just changed attitudes and how I wanted our relationship to be. Then i put some music that remind me of him, and then i lay down and start imagine, when i first met him, but i was changing it, i imagined that when he first meet me he was like "omg i need her" yk? And then i just imagined one moment that him comes to me and asked me to be his girlfriend bla bla bla, okay, then next day EVERYTHING happened, that easily.

Imagination is SUPER Underrated sometimes. Like, you can and ALWAYS manifest just imagining, because there's no actually difference between the physical (3d) and mental/imagination (4d), the 3d is a reflex of 4d, and imagination is the 4d too, so when you imagine your manifestation, you're living it, so girl, just do it.

513 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

The Handmaid’s Tale is a NECESSARY watch to further understand Uttara Phalguni. The show is basically about men profiting off and milking women for children in order to create stronger societies; they trade women and use them as cattle for reproduction. On top of that, there is immense fruit symbolism in the show. Most of the cast have Uttara Phalguni, Pushya or Rohini placements. Uttara Phalguni deals with the oppression of women as “fruit-givers” aka all women being used for their precious, abundant life-force energy. Milked by society for their abundance yet abused and suppressed like they are nothing. Under these rigid roles, Uttara Phalguni women must use their power of seduction and their wit to outsmart the system and profit off it right back in order to obtain spiritual freedom.

Unconsciously, this is why a lot of Uttara Phalguni women would rather choose to stay away from the process of marriage and love because she believes most men are not spiritually awakened enough to treat her properly as the divine being she is. She avoids being objectified and oppressed at all costs. That’s why when Ketu entered Uttara Phalguni, the 4B movement hit. I actually predicted something like that would occur before Ketu entered this nakshatra because I KNEW what this nakshatra is all about.

The sutra of this nakshatra mentions a wish-fulfilling, fruit giving woman. This nakshatra is all about the continuation of traditions through lineages or societies. It is the process of marrying and extending the family or the process of joining in union with someone and extending sacred traditions (which is why Uttara Phalguni is associated with secret societies). This nakshatra deals with hypergamy and social climbing through generating one’s own success through their creative self-expression and fruits of wisdom that have been passed down to them from generations ago.

For these reasons, these natives are very focused on creating alliances with foreign nations (in order to strengthen their own). They are lovers of history (see Indiana Jones, played by an Uttara Phalguni native) who appreciate and preserve artifacts of the past. Magha is often renowned for its ability to channel the sacred power of the ancestors, but Aryaman (Uttara Phalguni) is the King of those ancestors.

This nakshatra is also associated with conquering the material world and anything that descends from the heavens onto Earth (so like, aliens taking over the world is a common theme in this nakshatra as well, which is why these natives are often casted as alien hunters). Christopher Columbus (unfortunately) had Uttara Phalguni moon.

Arjuna said he was Phalguna as he was born on a day where moon transited through the Phalguni nakshatras and he conquered some parts of the material world in which some parts he did it through marriage in order to create stronger alliances with each part of the world.

42 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

GUYS I CANNOT EMPHASIZE THIS ENOUGH!!

YOU'RE THE CREATOR OF YOUR REALITY.

read that again. You're the CREATOR of your reality.

your 3D is JUST the PROJECTION of your inner beliefs and assumptions, whatever you PERCEIVE as the TRUTH of your reality, will ALWAYS & EACH TIME REFLECT in your reality NO MATTER ANYTHING. That's THE LAW.

like i seriously want to scream this into y'all ears!! (with love ofc). it is just THAT SIMPLE.

THE REASON YOU CAN'T SEE IT IN YOUR 3D IS BECAUSE OF YOUR CONTINUOUS DENIAL TO BELIEVING YOU ALREADY ARE IT.

Your 3D cannot show you what you don't see as truth, your 3D is YOU. You're constantly being shown what you perceive as truth within yourself. Your 3D CANNOT show you betrayal by not showing you what you want, only your refusal to accept it as truth CAN.

You cannot just say "do i lack the power of manifesting?" "Why is it taking so long?" "where is it?" Etc and then expect you'll get what you want!! you gotta PERSIST.

It is absolutely okay to waver at times but realise that your reality won't show you your desires until and unless you've attached your truth to it, you've to stick to the new story which is just knowing that it's done.

You don't have to act a certain way in your 3D, you have nothing to do with 3D, like I said, it's a mere projection of your perception of self. you're the ONLY POWER and the ONLY one who CONTROLS THIS SHIT.

YOU'RE GOD.

I'm screaming this to y'all until you all understand. Stop doubting yourself and START applying the law, you won't get what you want if you never start or give up after 2 minutes of persisting. idc if y'all affirm 24/7 or just decide it's done and live your life, whatever makes you happy, JUST DO IT ALREADY and PERSIST OMFG.

YOU RUN THIS SHIT. PLS RESPECT YOURSELF AND YOUR POWER. YOU'RE TOO POWERFUL FOR THIS.

2K notes View Post

itsmymochichim

1 month ago

Uttara Phalguni & Dhanishta women are so similar to me. Interesting because the Vasus (Dhanishta’s deities) stole Kamadhenu (Uttara Phalguni). By the way, Uttara Phalguni is typically associated with Nandi, but I saw the strong connection between the wish-fulfilling cow & the wish-fulfilling woman mentioned in Uttara Phalguni’s sutra. Then I noticed someone else saw the connection between Uttara Phalguni & Kamadhenu (shreemastrology on Twitter).

The same way Claire Nakti mentioned how there is always a Dhanishta woman for each generation who is a sex symbol (I really hope she doesn’t take that video down but I think it’s still up so go watch if you haven’t!!), I’ve noticed the same for Uttara Phalguni. One of the women she mentioned actually had an Uttara Phalguni placement as well (Sophia Loren)

There was Sophia Loren, Olivia Newton John, Britney Spears, Nicki Minaj, and now Doja Cat.

These women are naturally different in their own expression of this trope, but considering how Uttara Phalguni is the center stage & the objectified female form, it makes complete sense why these women rise to the spotlight continuously. They eventually become “cash cows” because sex sells, and Uttara Phalguni is the feminine expression of sexuality (hence its associated with the sex organs, lips, left hand, the blossoming of a flower. Lips & flowers are symbolic of the Yoni. It’s also why this nakshatra is the awakening of Shakti. It’s just that society has distorted and tainted how natural and beautiful the awakening of Shakti is.)

Aryaman also rules the traditions of a group of people. This might extend into the traditions of a society which produces (Uttara Phalguni is all about producing fruit + being wish-fulfilling) media that makes $. In other words: pop culture. This nakshatra is the idea of capitalism & industries within itself. And what runs industries at the end of the day? The idea that sex sells. The same way people exploit the female form is the same way humans exploit the Earth, as women are vessels of Mother Nature ♍️

Laura Mulvey coined the term “Male Gaze.” Not only did she have Ashlesha sun with potential Krittika moon, but Uttara Phalguni Venus (DK) conjunct Uttara Phalguni Rahu.

31 notes View Post

itsmymochichim

2 months ago

Mrigashira core 🦌