đŻ
Friedrich Nietzsche
   Prologue
It was no later than 1:00 AM when the sound of screams could be heard, the screams of a woman erupted from inside the house. The disheartening noise echoed through the corridors, crying out for help that hopefully would arrive. Sadly it wouldnât. Her husband had been killed in his sleep, heâd gone out easily after being shot. A death fit for any corrupt politician who buried several scandals that couldnât resurface. A killer who was as normal as normal could be walked out of the house satisfied with the outcome of his mission. Who knew someone like him would be capable of murder, no man on earth could walk as confidently as he did after committing such as heinous and grotesque crime.
The killer strides over to the car door preparing to dispose of the bodies. Of course he had come prepared, he had planned it from start to finish without resting. He himself had watched his two victims for weeks, along with hiring a private investigator who knew nothing of his intentions. It was gratifying when the investigator didnât ask for a reason. It was making his part of the job so much easier, all he had to do was buy what was required in order to complete his endeavor.
Pulling a jerry can from the trunk, the mysterious figure walked back inside with the jerry can in tow. Sad really how this had to come to an end, even more so knowing that he couldnât continue this little charade that had been going on for so long. Listening as the gasoline poured out of the can the man looked around the large living room, it was a shame that this had to be destroyed. It was a lovely home despite the awful smell coming from the bodies, at least that would be removed from the decor. The man poured a trail of gasoline from the living room back outside making sure the house would be swallowed in flames.
As the murderer began to light a match, he watched the flames dance before letting the match ignite the flammable liquid. It was so satisfying to watch the trail of gasoline being replaced by rising flames from the match. Waiting for the house to explode in flames was so avid, like the rush of adrenaline you have when waiting for the drop of a roller coaster.
The first section of the house to explode was the kitchen area, the force of the impact shattered the window above the sink. Another in the study upstairs, and in mere seconds the roof of the house was surrounded by flames. Walking away from the scene of the crime, the killer began to laugh thinking about the headlines for the News-cast.
âMountain Killer Strikes Again.â
Don't worry, hun. The Space Between Us Is only Temporary. We'll collide back again to each other's arms. For now, let us recover from our own crisis and issues until 100% we hit full on recharged and refreshment, then there comes our lovely moment together again. Love Awaits. Can't wait any longer. For Us
There are some bad memories â whether of a crime or a painful life event â that weâd rather not recall. New research shows that people can successfully inhibit some incriminating memories, reducing the memoriesâ impact on automatic behaviors and resulting in brain activity similar to that seen in âinnocentâ participants.
The research is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
âIn real life, many individuals who take memory detection tests want to distort their results. Using a lab-based crime simulation, we examined whether people can indeed suppress guilty memories and avoid detection,â explains lead researcher Xiaoqing Hu of the University of Texas at Austin. âOur study indicates that suppression can be effective in certain ways, helping us to limit unwanted memoriesâ influence over our behavior.â
Hu conducted the study when he was a Ph.D. student at Northwestern University with colleagues Zara M. Bergström of the University of Kent and Galen V. Bodenhausen and J. Peter Rosenfeld of Northwestern University.
The researchers recruited 78 undergraduate students and randomly assigned them to one of three groups. Two of the groups, both âguiltyâ groups, were instructed to find and steal a particular object from a faculty memberâs mailbox. The object was actually a ring, but the word âringâ was never mentioned in the instructions. This was to ensure that any evidence of ring-related memories would be the result of committing the actual crime and not from listening to the instructions.
A third group, the âinnocentâ group, was told to go to the same area and simply write their initials on a piece of poster board.
Some of the guilty students were then told that they shouldnât allow memory of stealing the ring come to mind at all during the following concealed-information test (CIT) â that is, they were instructed to suppress the memory. The other guilty students and the innocent students were not given any suppression instructions.
The three groups completed a CIT, a brainwave-based test that can be used to evaluate whether an individual has specific knowledge suggesting involvement in a crime. On each trial, participants were presented with either the target item (e.g., the word âringâ) or one of six crime-irrelevant items (e.g., âbracelet,â ânecklace,â âwatch,â âcufflink,â âlocket,â âwalletâ) while their brain activity was recorded using EEG. The researchers were specifically interested in looking at the P300, a brainwave that indicates conscious recollection.
The students also completed an autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) in which they had to indicate whether specific statements were true or false. Response times on the aIAT are thought to reflect the strength of a particular association â the faster the response, the more strongly held that association is, regardless of the personâs explicitly stated thoughts and feelings.
As expected, the researchers found that the guilty participants showed significantly larger P300 responses to the target than to the irrelevant stimuli â but only if they hadnât been given instructions to suppress memories of the crime.
Those who suppressed crime-related memories showed no difference in P300 activity between the two types of stimuli, resulting in data that were indistinguishable from those of innocent participants.
In addition, suppressed-memory participants were also less likely than the other guilty participants to associate crime-related memories with the truth on the aIAT. However, the data suggested that guilty-suppressors could still be identified via another brainwave, known as the late posterior negativity.
Together, the findings suggest that memory suppression dampens neural activity associated with retrieving memories and also limits the influence of these memories on automatic behavioral responses.
The researchers are planning on exploring this memory suppression effect further, investigating whether it might be applied to other types of personally significant memories.
âFor example, we can all recall times when we hurt others or behaved inappropriately and these memories can carry feelings of guilt and shame. Can we suppress these kinds of memories, and what are the consequences of such suppression?â says Hu.
While traumatic memories may seem like an obvious target for suppression, the researchers point out that these memories stem from emotional events involving strong physiological arousal and itâs unclear whether suppression would be effective in reducing their impact.
Listen to Luhan - Promises by Deyak Nisa on #SoundCloud
A refreshing synth pop perf for streaming at this houRawr #CpopSyndrome Definitely my #CpopCollection æçćżćŒćżäș
Fuck.
Tumblr of Happiness đ
Vintage illustration of Fingerprint Patterns. Fingerprints have been collected, observed and tested as a means of unique identification of people for more than 100 years. The two basic ideas scientists believe about fingerprints are: 1. Fingerprints never change. Small ridges form on a personâs hands and feet before they are born and do not change for as long as the person lives. 2. No two fingerprints are alike. The ridges on the hands and feet of all people have three characteristics (ridge endings, birfurcations and dots) which appear in combinations that are never repeated on the hands or feet of any two people. In the over 140 years that fingerprints have been routinely compared world wide, no two areas of friction skin on any two people (including identical twins) have been found to contain the same individual characteristics in the same unit relationship. This means that in general, any area of friction skin that you can cover with a dime (and often with just a pencil eraser) on your fingers, palms, or soles of your feet will contain sufficient individual characteristics in a unique unit relationship to enable positive identification to the absolute exclusion of any other person on earth.
Almost every occurence in my dreams turns out a real event in my life. How come?
I'm coming there to touch you and snuggle up
Our real time is different similarly by how opposite the regions both of us came from. His crack of dawn was when my feet wide apart in extreme sound sleep, no signs of awakeness, not of a hiss of breath neither unconscious groans
He said he witnesses both the sunrise and sundown.
He, then could no longer watch a film-like state of dreams in slumber.
The dark couldn't look after his weary eyes, as his light coloured iris (chroma) rejects radiating the same old glow in such hypnotic glare
If I take a look closer at his eyes, there's barely sadness, happiness, or bubbliness of some sort. The night was robbed off his sleep wires in brain. Completely vanished. A boy of nocturne hours, night that's silent yet insane
Im having withdrawals
Losin' expectations
But this feels quite normal
Soaked in your aroused smile
Seep into ur ecstatic veins
Hold my arms so tight to keep me sane