124 posts
Adventure Time (with Sansa and Lemmy)
Huevember - Day 4.
Sansa is having a weird dream…
Reading the article, Nick's complaints about the film are:
The cartoonishly over-the-top greedy and selfish middle fingers to Big Pharma and "philanthropists" are poorly written and have no depth... because they are cartoonishly over-the-top middle fingers to Big Pharma and "philanthropists"
Ridley is unsympathetic and ungrateful for not being 100% with making billions off the corpse of an innocent mystical creature, can't she see her Dad just wants what's best for *her*?
The plot is tooootally predictable and therefore loses points for originality and impact
And his one bit of praise is that Shepard was magnificently fun to watch, and all because Will Poulter put his soul in it, but you know what, that's valid.
Holy shit, this was scathing.
Bahahaha the URL
https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/death-of-a-unicorn-review-paul-rudd-and-jenna-ortegas-terrible-horror-comedy/
I *thought* he looked familiar! Well, I've had worse excuses to see movies twice in theaters + string together a double feature
If I had a nickel for every science fiction/comedy movie Stephen Park was in in 2025 I’d have two nickels which isn’t a lot but it is funny it happened twice
(Head of security in Mickey 17 and medical lead in Death of a Unicorn)
This makes me happy in ways I can't articulate, you did wonderfully. If you have the time and energy for it, I implore you, please don't stop
“Hey, wanna go to the mall today?”
a personal challenge to see how many characters/references I could fit into one picture, could definitely still do more!
We've been without the next book too long if this is what we've been reduced to when it comes to theories and plot twists... 😅
Apparently the favourite Rhaegar x Lyanna explanation is now that the whole war is actually Brandon Stark's fault (Rhaegar only kidnapped Lyanna to save her from Aerys' wrath, realised how perfect this arrangement was for the prophecy, he told Rickard about it but didn't have time to tell Brandon and Brandon then ruined everything when he went to King's Landing). Like. Sure, time to blame the guy who lost his sister and was then brutally murdered alongside his father. Also, Rickard definitely would have been fine with his only daughter, whose betrothal was decided by him, becoming the crown prince's second wife (at beast). Anything to absolve Rhaegar of blame
Wow.
Also, can we remember that what started the war was not Brandon riding in to the Red Keep and being a little too confrontational about the fact that his sister was abducted by the crown prince, but the fact that Aerys chose to murder eight people about it? Lords and their sons? Without trial? Lords of the Riverlands, Vale and North? And then went on to demand the murder of two more, Eddard Stark and Robert Baratheon, the new Lord Stark and the Lord of Storm's End? Two of the highest Lords in his Realm? On the basis of absolutely nothing?
Even if the hare-brained theory had any merit - that Rickard Stark would have been fine with making a concubine of his only daughter and destroying a betrothal that would have made her the Lady of Storm's End - that still has no bearing on the fact that Aerys decided to be a tyrannical, sadistic murderer instead of following the rule of law and upholding his end of the feudal contract and granting a fair trial.
And given the volatile political position of House Targaryen at the time, given that a block of informal alliances had formed between North, Vale, Stormlands and Riverlands, Rhaegar is STILL INSANELY CULPABLE if he did not realize that kidnapping half of a future marriage within that alliance block would be the domino that would send political stability in the Realm crashing and burning. Even if Aerys had not been a sadistic tyrant. Which, however, he was!
The conduct of House Targaryen is from every angle indefensible and no amount of contrived excuses will change that.
Oh yeah, I forgot about him. No excuses there...
I like to think Conquest always whispers his darkest secrets to people he's about to kill because he has nobody to chat with. "I love rainy days, fluffy kitties, and double rainbows. Take that to your grave." *CRUNCH*
I don't have an issue with the believability of Cecil's dumb hubris nearly as much as I do with the fact that in the Invincible universe, not only can you survive after your head's been shattered into a literal pile of goo, but you can also still talk to request medical assistance.
I understand what you mean, and boy howdy I can already see this splitting the fandom by arguing over it's inclusion as a slight departure from the comics...
Invincible s3 finale spoilers!!
I am so sorry for what I'm about to say to all Conquest enjoyers. However.
His little monolgue thingy at Mark felt a lot like this image.
I can't explain much why it just felt like random trauma dumping idk. I guess you could argue that because he had no rules or regulations for his mission he felt more open about sharing his expierence with him since he thought was going to kill Mark anyways and it gave him a little bit of hope that not all viltrumites or half ones like Mark are heartless especially earlier he says something about having the heart of one. ...damn I think I talked myself out of my initial reaction to this scene lol just a bit...it's still funny tho especially the way he words it about not having anybody want to be his friend idk it sounds like a teenager who's the loner kid but there's a reason why nobody wants to friends with them yknow 😭
[I don't have an issue with Cecil's dumb hubris nearly as much as I do with the fact that in the Invincible universe, not only can you survive after your head's been shattered into a literal pile of goo, but you can still talk to request medical assistance]
I just chalk that up to Viltrumite's having a slightly slower version of Wolverine's healing factor and call it a day... 😅
I like to think Conquest always whispers his darkest secrets to people he's about to kill because he has nobody to chat with. "I love rainy days, fluffy kitties, and double rainbows. Take that to your grave." *CRUNCH*
I don't have an issue with the believability of Cecil's dumb hubris nearly as much as I do with the fact that in the Invincible universe, not only can you survive after your head's been shattered into a literal pile of goo, but you can also still talk to request medical assistance.
Please?
Sooooo Mickey 17 edit with The Fine Print when
A four-plus year journey into a frozen hell at the beck and call of a pompous moron will give anybody "f*ck it, we ball" energy
Nasha discover her boyfriend has two living clones which means he’s at risk of BEING KILLED FOREVER and her first reaction is to get freaky with it…. You gotta respect it 🙂↔️
Thank goodness, I'm not the only one who thought they were similar! 🥰
The creatures in Mickey 17 reminded me of the bug creatures in Nausicaa!
With a rusty tailpipe
"We are fortunate that President Trump has indicated that he will work with us on a solution to reinstate TikTok once he takes office. Please stay tuned!" how about you go fuck yourself
How sweet of you, Mister President Trump 🙄
Reminder for when he “saves” it. He was the one who wanted this, and now he gets to be the hero and win favour with young constituents. Don’t give him the credit for fixing his own problem.
I want a 200 issue comic and three seasons of a TV show 🤩🥰
the people yearn for turn of the century sonic gijinkas
here are my many inspirations
Amusing on two levels: one is the secret dragon baker boy's name secret name Baegael sounding like the delicious baked good known as the bagel, and of course the fact secret dragon baker boy is bae, as in the slang term for someone who is wholesome and agreeable
listen I’m so glad you all are having fun with the dragon incest show, but I need you to understand that from the outside all I see is approximately 14 posts per day of people in truly horrific wigs with captions like “baegael did nothing wrong except all the murders”
I nominate Cartoon Saloon to do the deed of animating
No more live action a song of ice and fire adaptions. Anime ONLY. I want that shit treated like Vox Machina
Gonna hang onto this until Season 5...
If Ashley does end up with a stable superpower, I hope it’s super-hair like Medusa and Sindel.
Please I wanna move out next year
This is Money Snake. She only appears every 312 years.
If you reblog her picture within the next twenty-five seconds you will have good luck and fortune for the rest of your life.
WHAT SATURDAY MORNING CARTOON SUPERVILLAIN BULLSHIT IS THIS!?
What am I looking at..? Is that a whole chicken? A pie? Is that gelatine? *What* am I looking at..?
Every aspic of this is terrible.
The Art of French Cooking - 1962
Your assumption is infinitely funnier than me typing up a 4k word essay on why that expression is apropos for the man who pulled the queen mother of political long cons to *become* Emperor Palpatine
This is the funnest expression ever pulled in all of starwars history
This is all of course hinging on the (not entirely unfounded) assumption that Jon is going to get the same resurrection as in the show.
Which will sting more for Jonerys shippers? Reviving him just in time for him to learn the horrible truth and want -100% to do with his aunt?
Or Martin going for broke and having him stay dead and nobody; not Bran and his visions of the past, not Sam finding secret records of Rhaegar annuling his marriage so he can wed Lyanna, nobody finds out Jon Snow's heritage. Ned Stark's greatest secret will forever go to the grave with him, and the cruelty and pointlessness of his death proves the final nail in the coffin of the Prophecy of Ice and Fire?
targ stans love book!jon now but will turn on him the moment he thinks dany is kinda weird 😭
Jon looking at the burned remnants of KL,
"Dany did this? What a fucking weirdo" 😂
I just think it would be a shame for all the history between the families to be brushed aside rather than culminating in an interesting way? As in, Aerys murdered Jon's grandad, his uncle, and Rhaegar ran off with Jon's mother only for her to die. In addition to any anger about being lied to about his birth, grief over his mother, the loss is of learning he is not Ned’s son, Jon should feel the full weight of Ned claiming him as his own to protect him -- despite what the Targs did to his family. Shouldn’t Jon then have some feelings about a Targ invading Westeros? Even if his dad was a Targ? It makes it interesting because on the one hand, there’s a unique connection there to allow layers in a confrontation (they’re family!), but on the other, few have greater reason to be opposed.
For Jon "Let them say that Eddard Stark had fathered four sons, not three" to have no opinion on a Targ brutally conquering Westeros after Ned tried to get rid of them, well, it would feel like a waste of all that backstory? Also, shouldn’t he have thoughts about Dany specifically after she kills Aegon, after the Dothraki do what she's gonna be incapable of preventing, after the destruction of a city with unimaginable civilian deaths? So not only pre canon puts him on guard, but then what transpires in canon will horrify him?
Even if we take it out of the Targ v Stark context, very early on we learn Ned had to chase Jorah down for being a slaver and Mormont told Jon what a disgrace Jorah was, so Jon got the "Jorah Mormont is a loser" message coming from two father figures. Doesn’t that seem like a deliberate choice by the author? To prime Jon to despise a man he’s written as obsessed with Dany? And of course, there's Tyrion, a Lannister who wanted to hold the North by marrying Jon's little sister who will be with Dany too, so there’s just all sorts of angles to approach a Jon and Dany meeting, none of which bode well.
So much fun stuff to dig into! To ignore it seems like a far less exciting take. But yeah, judging by the reaction to show Jon, I don’t think the fandom will take kindly to his inevitable reaction to Dany.
Todd Ingram -vs- The League or Ex-traordianry Gentlemen.
I love how Wallace ended up being Todd’s gay awakening and then they DIDN’T end up together in the end
Instead Wallace led him on by failing to communicate that their fling was temporary and now Todd has an unhealthy obsession with Wallace and it’s so so so funny (and so tragic)
Next thing you know Wallace’s new boyfriend is gonna have to fight Todd’s new league of Wallace’s evil exes
Mr. Neil, I have a question for you regarding the third season of the series Good Omens, I have heard that supposedly the angel Aziraphale will be a villain in the series, is this true??? I have a lot of concern and fear as well, I hope for your prompt response to my question.
Everything you've heard about Season 3 of Good Omens is always true, because if there's one thing we love doing on Good Omens, it's telling everyone the plot years ahead of time.
Aziraphale will be a villain called The Snaffler, a costumed super-thief out to steal the famed Jet Jaguar diamond in order to power his world-destroying laser beam gun. Only his wife the lovely and hilarious Sadie, a bumbling Spanish Police Inspector with a moustache, and a man in a gorilla suit stand between him and his goal.
Not me, already drafting contract terms in my head for what I get in exchange for my firstborn...
There are two small play areas in my apartment complex: one sad two-seat swingset within ten feet of a boggy pond, and one anemic cookie-cutter play place twenty feet from a creek 4-feet wide. There are no fences.
If apartment management is trying to surreptitiously trade neighbor children to water monsters, I wish they'd cut us into the bargain and lower the rent.
Laser tag babies
So do we... strike? Sign a petition to maintain Discord independance..?
Patton seems to agree ^^
"The trannies should be able to piss in whatever toilet they want and change their bodies however they want. Why is it my business if some chick has a dick or a guy has a pie? I'm not a trannie or a fag so I don't care, just give 'em the medicine they need."
"This is an LGBT safe space. Of COURSE I fully support individuals who identify as transgender and their right to self-determination! I just think that transitioning is a very serious choice and should be heavily regulated. And there could be a lot of harm in exposing cis children to such topics, so we should be really careful about when it is appropriate to mention trans issues or have too much trans visibility."
One of the above statements is Problematic and the other is slightly annoying. If we disagree on which is which then working together for a better future is going to get really fucking difficult.