(He/They) Clown, Concept Artist, Average Art Enjoyer
138 posts
Take this with you
In the 2000s, phones had quirks and class....
Source
Video of Tama
Follow Ultrafacts for more facts
Yeah, but what does the gorilla do when I Perfect Parry every hit in his Twirling Fits super and land a LP, low MK, to SA2, huh? What then?
we've been doing this thing called "hitting the nosferatu" where you hunch your shoulders and walk towards things while pointing with a long creepy finger
bring back tumblr ask culture let me. bother you with questions and statements
one of my coworkers has this sticker on his water bottle and it sends me into hysterics every time i see it
Something I keep noticing about conversations I have with friends is that I never put any of my opinions in any elegant way that makes sense. And rather than just listing off reasons why I hate (music) streaming off the cuff, I'll explain where I would have put streaming service cash at the very least.
To some extent, this is a sister post to the audiophile one.
Bandcamp is an independent music platform that took a ~20% cut from any sale, leaving the rest for the musician. At the time, this was notable against iTunes *30%; with the rest having to be split between label and artist. Nowadays, it is very easy and affordable for musicians to get their music on any of the big platforms via Distrokid and like services. All of this to say that if an artist or album isn't on Bandcamp, or any other service that isn't iTunes, I'll still buy it off of iTunes since a single sale from one song makes an artist more money than paying $20 to Spotify.
As an aside; second hand CDs are a gray area purchase. I like owning my media; physical or otherwise. But I would be remiss to claim that buying a CD from a thrift store would be supporting an artist.
*I think they changed to match Bandcamp's split recently, but after they started doing music streaming.
Spotify and like music streaming services have been notorious for having bad payouts for their artists. Despite turning in positive revenue for the industry, the comical amount of artists who put their songs on Spotify means this split is literal pennies for multi-million streams on popular songs. Spotify is a platform that absolutely can be used to gain an audience or find new artists; but YouTube is (technically) free and Bandcamp lets people listen to whole songs before buying them.
Buying a single song at an artist's asking price on Bandcamp, fuck even iTunes, directly supports them. And it's nice to have high quality files to save onto my hard drive that I know won't be taken down due to *licensing or whatever.
Awkwardly, I don't have a better segway into this next thought; more airing out my conflicting ideas about "owning media" and piracy.
I'm very aware that purchasing a game off of Steam and like services don't mean I "own" that game. I am licensing it from whoever is running that platform. GOG exists and lets customers download complete installers without any licensing or DRM. But most modern industry games are at most worth stealing on the bay since; the labor involved in its creation has already been paid for by the publisher, and only the publisher/producer gets the sales afterward. Paying for a game on steam or GOG really comes down to who is having a sale at any given moment.
Another aside; Itch.io is like a sister site to Bandcamp, except that they platform games and other digital media. Also, their split is theoretically 0% for independent game developers. Ethically speaking, it's better to spend the amount of cash that it would have taken to buy one new AAA game on a handful of short indie games. The cash stretches farther, and the money goes directly to the labor and talent responsible for it. That is to say:
The concept of owning a purchase and owning a file is something I never think about explaining. A file, no matter how ephemeral, exists on storage somewhere. And I like to spend money to make sure that a copy of that file can exist on storage that I own and can access regardless of my connection to the internet. It doesn't matter how I get my hands on that file; ripped CDs, purchases off of any modern platform, or even piracy. I don't want to pay the cash for streaming, the cash never really touches the hands I'd want it too anyway. I never pirate games, since I never game enough to make it actually worth the risk involved in finding safe cracks.
To that, and I doubt it's the best example, I'm someone who "buys digital art commissions." Arguably, it's a digital file I spent $200+ on and will likely keep to myself after the fact. A vanity purchase of questionable value. But like vain nobility of eld, I spend the cash for the effort, labor, and skill of an artist because I don't like looking at my own art like supporting an artist I like the work of. Or personally know (@mintyfreshka). Owning the file at the end is somewhat secondary, but it's nice to have the project file to make my own edits, than an already baked JPEG.
I've yet to really meet an artist who doesn't like handing over their project file at request, or even with an additional cost. But I'd be cool if they want to keep it to themselves, since today's landscape is kinda dire for artists.
Soda Pop: A highly carbonated soda drink. It can be used to restore 50 HP to a single Pokémon.
I’ve seen a friend (@mintyfreshka) look into getting a DAP after I got into the worst consumer hobby out there. So I thought to write this up mostly for him, as this is probably the biggest money sink someone could get into without some guidance on how to approach it.
To be more clear; there is a claim that audiophiles don’t really listen to music, rather they are listening to the equipment they are listening too. That is very accurate after seeing discussions on forms regarding “best equipment” and what not. And personally, I also believe that discussion goes both ways; Hi-Fi nerds are not too different from Analog purists. At some point it stops being about the music and more about how the way it’s being listened too. Not that there isn’t merit to that discussion, rather it’s a very easy way to discourage oneself from even considering seeing what the space brings to the listening experience. In essence: the focus of even considering hi-fi equipment in the first place shouldn’t be the equipment itself. Or initially, at least. Really, the first step is to look at one’s own listening habits.
Surprise, this is secretly a post about how algorithms are the devil and streaming services are a rip-off. Building a library of music, physical or otherwise, should be the first priority; less about media ownership and more about having the files on hand that isn’t hosted on a companies' server. And no, the type of files being saved don’t matter much. There are better videos on this topic, but to put it succinctly: A (320kbps) MP3 file is subjectively not different from FLAC. Yes, there is more information retained in a FLAC. And if the FLAC particularly is one of those scary 24bit/192+kHz files, there is little chance someone would notice unless they have sensitive ears and scary expensive equipment. If fidelity is the priority and nothing else; go to a live show for a local band or something.
Speaking personally; the library of music I have has been built up though osmosis. Buying CDs from thrift stores, files off of iTunes and Bandcamp, going to the seas. I haven’t lost any of these files yet, and I don’t ever plan too. Although the question is where I keep these files is another question.
More so, don’t grab a dedicated device for those MP3s yet. If a phone still has a headphone jack, it can play music. Or use a pair of Bluetooth headphones. I really want to emphasize how easy and cheap it can be to listen to music without being tethered to the internet. A second-hand iPod or a cheap MP3 player can be easily be bought, then placed into a desk drawer after a month of novelty. Personally, I enjoyed my music just fine on my phone. Some android apps like Poweramp really juice up audio files as much as one can from their phone.
#
The rest of this post is going to be a further discussion on equipment; specifically regarding wired headphones. And while Bluetooth headphones are more than serviceable; a wired connection means the girl reading this doesn’t have to charge her headphones to use them.
This is more an example of what to grab, and ignore the aftermarket cable; a lot of IEMs on AliExpress are excellent if one knows what they are looking for. And if someone doesn’t, the Salnotes Zero 2s are fantastic for their price. Notably, these are tuned by a YouTuber; but they know what they are doing, so they are actually good. The best way to describe them is that they answer the question: what if Skullcandies were good? These have a nice weight at the low-end and have very clean mid-tones; I haven’t regretted getting these since I started using them.
The first generation of these are good too, and slightly cheaper; but they are very sharp in the high-end frequencies. I had these for a while and didn’t use them much because the high-frequency response really hurt after a while, even at a low volume. Besides that, they don’t really have much weight at the low-end but are perfectly flat all around save for the extra bright high-end. Great for Jazz and anything with wind instruments.
Both are roughly $30-35 CND on Amazon or AliExpress.
Yeah.
No, I’m very serious about this. Apple’s 3.5 mm to X adapter is arguably the best value for anyone that isn’t installed in the hi-fi space. Even some hi-fi nerds agree (technically). There are non-apple ones available on the market on Amazon, but I specifically recommend these for those who live in the Americas for how easy it is to acquire. Literally walk into a Best Buy, even a Staples/Office Max will have these in stock for phones with USB-C and Lightning ports. To address a slight issue with them; they can make headphones slightly quiet. And can be worse if It's bought in the EU; the output voltage is cut in half due to regulations. Again, alternatives can be found on AliExpress
This is the point where I would stop giving advice; as a decent pair of IEMs or any good headphones and Apple’s stupid dongle is probably the best way to listen to one’s music library from their phone. There shouldn’t really be anything stopping the guy reading this from enjoying his music. Well, except for the occasional notification or call that interrupts the music. There are settings in most music players to stop notifications from interrupting the music. Turning on do not disturb can work too; although one would have to remember to turn it off after listening to music.
…
A second device can do wonders for distraction free listening, and most second-hand phones can stand in for a MP3 player. Someone else put it best, but abstaining oneself from buying more crap is generally good thing. But I also think carrying around another phone is kinda silly, especially if the girl reading this is using it as a means to disconnect herself from that damn phone. Like me. I hate my phone and would like to move my library away from it.
I don’t have much personal experience with iPods aside from the Touches I have had in my drawer for ages. From what I have seen, there is a wide market of modded iPod Classics for those who don’t want to deal with the hassle of modding it themselves. Unless someone reading this is living in the future where iPods are now a luxury collectable. Great thing that there are MP3 players out there that aren’t related to Apple.
There are a ton of Digital Audio Players on the market; many of which would make someone wince when looking at their price. Many of these will try to market how they are “Hi-Res Audio” certified or can run a multitude of audio codecs. The things to really look out for is the kind of Digital Audio Converter it’s using, the Amp chip that it’s paired with. If the guy reading this is wondering what the difference, they make are: Hi-Fi nerds have done the research and can be found out with a quick web search.
After doing some searching and listening to the nerds, here is what I use at the moment:
There are many DAPs like it, but this one is mine.
The Snowsky Echo Mini is a great device for $70 CND. First, it’s one of the few non-andoroid based DAPs on the market. It can’t connect to the internet or whatever, but like that’s the point of a device that isn’t the damn phone. Second, The feature set is fantastic for its price. It’s got a pair of DACs for each ear, allowing it to send lots of juice out the two ports it has; one 3.5 mm output and a 4.4 mm balanced output. The latter is what I got the aftermarket cable for, as the balanced output outputs almost 3v and gives me way more headroom for volume. An added bonus is that it can play DSD/DSF cause the DAC it uses can decode it; not sure where I can get DSD/DSF files worth listening too or who even offers those these days.
This is really at the end of the advice I can personally give; past this point is where we get into the significant amounts of diminishing returns. More expensive DACs offer in-device EQs and additional ports for those who really want to dial in their sound, and headphones can really reach insane prices even before getting an expensive amp to power them. In the end, the most important thing is to enjoy the music and to not fuss if the equipment being used the best.
#
I hate when I say things like "oh I want an ipod classic but with bluetooth so I can use wireless headphones" and some peanut comes in and replies with "so a smartphone with spotify?" No. I want a 160GB+ rectangular monstrosity where I can download every version of every song I want to it and it does nothing except play music and I don't need a data connection and don't have to pay a subscription to not have ads and don't have popups suggesting terrible AI playlists all over the menus.
Gimme the clicky wheel and song titles like "My Chemical Romance- The Black Parade- Blood (Bonus Track)- secret track- album rip- high quality"
Do you prefer your potions with or without pulp?
So it's only my second blog post in this backlog series, and I'm already veering off-course from what I originally thought it was going to be lol. Basically I want these KH Re:Visited posts to be a way for me to look back on how I got into this series while I share it with a friend of mine: @plzdonthitmewithyourcar. I think both fans of the series and people with <1% knowledge about this funky ass series should be able to enjoy the post though.
(Start of backstory) My introduction to Kingdom Hearts was very unconventional; I essentially stumbled across a volume of the manga while browsing my local library as a kid:
So to my naive self, I assumed that this was the first volume of the whole series, and the "II" of the logo was lost on me (cuz I was a 11 year old lmao). I knew nothing about it, and the cover stood out to me so I decided to take it home and give it a read.
My introduction to the series consisted of what I think is still my favorite false-start to a game I've played. I fully went into this book, and by extension the KH series thinking that it was all about this young teen named Roxas and his friends living in Twilight Town slowly discovering a series of odd events relating to strange creatures called "Nobodies"; Enough to say that by the end of the first volume the rug got pulled out from under me as I was introduced to the true protagonist of the series, Donald, and Goofy: the first truly Disney characters (which also took me aback because I didn't know that the Square Enix x Disney crossover was so literal)
So with that first volume consumed and my pre-teen mind absolutely blown, I voraciously looked for anything else I could consume about the series. (End of backstory)
So now that I'm introducing a dear friend of mine to the series, I've decided to essentially follow the same path that I went on when I was learning the series while introducing them. I've only played the opening of KH2 with them, before we have now switched over to KH1. I'm very pleased that the opening still has the same charm that captured me years ago. The pleasant coziness and simplicity of Twilight Town, contrasted to the feeling of ominous foreshadowing when the supernatural elements begin to become more present and Roxas is forced to confront the answers to the questions he's been asking himself.
Game cinematics are sick AF, gameplay holds up so well (looking at you KH1), and the writing is very recognizably that charming yet unnatural approach to character-driven story.
Some of the things that I hadn't appreciated as much on my first playthrough was the interactions with Seifer, and how Hayner was essentially behind-the-scenes rallying people in the town to help figure out what was going on with Roxas and all the strange events that were beginning to show up around their quiet town. I think noticing interactions like those made me appreciate even more the tragic story of Roxas.
So yeah, this series is really special to me, and I'm really glad to be able to share it with people and blog about it. :)
is this something
Mouse Armor by Jeff de Boer
Etsy Mouse armor necklace and earrings available as well as other work by Jeff de Boor.
Shakespearean Seinfeld episode like:
"He thoued me, Jerry."
"He thoued you?"
"He thoued me!"
girl unhinge ur jaw
Art by • Frank Frazetta
Doctor, it's chronic. Maybe even infectious ':/
characterpilled Unfollow
[photo of the character]
i love my this. the charactr
characterpilled Unfollow
charac te r. ... ... . .... #FUUUUCK. THE CHARACTER.
characterpilled Unfollow
DOES ANYBODY EVER THINK ABOUT .THE CHARACTER
characterpilled Unfollow
[1.5k word essay about the character] #but like idk maybe im wrong
characterpilled Unfollow
character i love youso badly.
^dash when someone is possessed by The Character core (this post is positive)