Spotted on campus today.
[Image description: A sign, affixed to an emergency exist door, reading “My friends. I know that sometimes a door will say it has an alarm when it does not really have an alarm, and instead just serves a rebellious and convenient shortcut. [In bold and all caps:] THIS DOOR 100% ACTUALLY HAS AN ALARM. [End bold and caps.] Don’t open it! It’s extremely annoying! [Bold and caps again:] THE ALARM IS REAL AND WILL MAKE A LOUD SOUND. [End bold and caps.] Thanks. [End image description.]]
Yes, of course. Not letting boys wear skirts is still a form of sexism.
How much support we got out there?
I haven’t seen a lot of posts that shed some positivity for non-binary Muslims who wear the hijab – I personally sometimes feel it’s frustrating that people see hijabi non-binary people as “female” just because the hijab is an obligation for women. My hijab does not define my gender; only my obligation to my God and my religion!
Shoutout to all non-binary hijabi Muslims out there; you are valid and Allah loves you, insya-Allah!
How did you become so awesome?
I’m not awesome; awesome people don’t take months to reply to messages. But thank you, Anon!
I do not understand this “male privilege" bullshit.
What. Fucking. Privileges. Do. Men. Have.???????
Name them. I swear, I challenge you to name these “male privileges" and be able to prove them.
Come on, I fucking dare you.
Name them!
@slatestarscratchpad
My possibly-incorrect understanding of the tax bill is that it doesn’t implement all the deductions at once, which suggests that it wouldn’t add the same amount to the debt this year as it would in, say, 2024. This means that the “x dollars per year” formulation is problematic because it will vary radically depending on which year we look at.
(This seems like it could be solved by “x dollars per year starting in 20whenever, but there might be some reason why that doesn’t work.)
The news I read about the tax plan says it will add $1 trillion to the national debt. Occasionally it ends with “…over the next decade”.
Is there a reason this phrasing is preferable to “will add $100 billion per year to the national debt” or “will add $10 trillion to the national debt over the next century” or “will add $2.50 to the national debt over the next microsecond”?
If not, are headlines like “NEW TAX PLAN WILL ADD $1 TRILLION TO DEBT” completely arbitrary, since they could have made it any number by changing the (unspoken) time course?
Care to justify that comment?
I do not understand this “male privilege" bullshit.
What. Fucking. Privileges. Do. Men. Have.???????
Name them. I swear, I challenge you to name these “male privileges" and be able to prove them.
Come on, I fucking dare you.
Name them!
If you are a non-Jewish person attempting to be inclusive of Jewish holidays and traditions, but your method of doing so starts from the assumption that Judaism is exactly like Christianity but with less Jesus, and/or that Hanukkah is just like Christmas but eight days long and harder to spell, you are doing it wrong.
(Hanukkah traditions: not actually Christmas traditions with a different color scheme! Including Jewish traditions: not actually talking about Hanukkah exactly like Christmas but with the name of the holiday switched around! Judaism and Christianity are different and their holidays are different. If you actually want to include Jewish people, recognizing these differences is an important step.)