A Complete Crypto Social Media Marketing Strategy Guide

Sega Dreamcast (Divers 2000)

Bitcoin Approaching $45k, Litecoin and BorroeFinance Expected to Rally

Bitcoin (BTC) has been trending higher for seven consecutive weeks, approaching the $45,000 mark. This upward trend has attracted both novice and experienced investors, driven by high optimism and ongoing discussions about ETFs. Traders expect altcoins like Litecoin (LTC) and BorroeFinance (ROE) to extend their gains alongside Bitcoin’s rise.

Litecoin, one of the major altcoins, has been in focus recently. BitPay, a crypto payment processor, has integrated Litecoin, allowing users to pay for Microsoft services using LTC. Additionally, Mecum Auctions has started accepting Litecoin as well. These developments have led to increased demand for LTC, pushing its price up to $73.60. The increasing number of transactions and active unique addresses also indicate a rising demand for Litecoin.

BorroeFinance, on the other hand, is an emerging altcoin that leverages artificial intelligence to connect investors with businesses or content creators seeking funding. The platform uses AI to assess risks and match investors with ventures aligned to their interests. BorroeFinance recently launched on the Polygon network, offering a secure and audited marketplace for earning, trading, and funding. The native token of the platform, ROE, is deflationary and powers the functionalities of the platform. In the ongoing presale, over 99% of the allocated ROE tokens have been sold. However, the long-term utility and adoption of BorroeFinance and its ROE token are yet to be tested.

To read the full article, click here.

Hashtags: #bitcoin, #litecoin, #borroefinance, #cryptocurrency

1994

Source: Youtube/Rad Retro

Get free CS GO skins!

Play mobile games, test mobile apps, complete surveys and other simple online tasks to earn money, withdraw them as crypto, paypal or get skins and gift cards for all the top gaming platforms.

Hundreds of mobile games to play, some pay over $100 each to complete so you can earn some good amounts of money here.

Join - https://moneylinks.me/freecash

Philippines’ top crypto traders form association to advocate crypto investment literacy

IMPACT, the first crypto traders association in the Philippines, was founded by seasoned investors, daring “degen” traders, and staunch advocates of free crypto education.   As crypto adoption continues to grow in the country, top cryptocurrency traders have formally announced the formation of the Innovative Movement of the Philippine Association of Crypto Traders (IMPACT). The group aims to…

View On WordPress

Play this game of thrones mobile game using womplay app and earn EOS cryptocurrency plus win free nfts.

Build an empire and control the seven kingdoms, the game is fun to play and will keep you entertained for many hours.

Download - https://moneylinks.me/womplay

Fintech valuations are tanking

Asset manager Schroders has cut the value of its stake in financial "superapp" Revolut by 46%. What are the implications?

Some of Europe’s top fintech firms are starting to crumble as investors question their true valuation. Asset manager Schroders has cut the value of its stake in financial “superapp” Revolut by 46%, according to a filing on April 17 that threatens Revolut’s title as the UK’s most valuable fintech. The writedown suggests the London-headquartered firm is now valued at about $17.7bn (£14.2bn), which is substantially less than the $33bn it was valued at in a funding round last July. Revolut has been criticised for the late filing of accounts, EU regulatory breaches and corporate culture. It has also been waiting two years for regulators to approve its UK banking license. Schroders has also marked down its stake in Atom Bank by 31%. Meanwhile, Allianz is selling its stake in struggling fintech N26 at a heavily-reduced price, according to the Financial Times, while buy-now-pay-later firm Klarna has seen its valuation tumble from $45.6bn to $6.7bn.

You know, the entire US economic system is so messed up and so is a lot of your views of it (and I mean on both sides, I also include myself in this since I often don't realize until I *really* think about it) but like. Let's start by talking about taxes. There was a post going around lately that was like

Anyways this is not true. You can deduct INTEREST on mortgage from your taxes. Not mortgage itself. And for renters, in 23 states you can do the same. It's meant to be an offset for property taxes, which, in case you didn't know, are INSANE. Like my family pays more taxes on our house and property then on THE ENTIRE REST OF OUT TAXES, and we're in the top tax bracket. They don't tax you nearly enough on your ACTUAL INCOME but tax you way to much on your property and stock. It's basically based on, if you sold everything right now, what would we then be able to tax you. It's not measuring how much you make on a year to year basis, it's measuring how much you managed to save up over a long period in order to buy your big household a home that has enough space for everyone. It's definitely possible with housing/property taxes for them to cost so much that you can no longer afford your house and land, that you reasonably worked and saved up for. That's kind of unfair. Especially if you bought it when housing was cheap, and since the value on such things has gone up, so have your taxes. You weren't spending an insane amount of money on it. But now it's worth about 1.1 million and you've gotta move out or pay taxes on that. That's a thing that happens.

And meanwhile, a mega rich person who loves the city and therefore doesn't bother with a lot of land is taxed less than the moderately well off person in the previous example.

So the tax system is messed up, people need to pay more based on their actual income and less based on their homes.

Oh another thing with taxes is you know how charitable donations are tax deductible? Yeah only to a certain amount, meaning that there is no incentive for rich people to donate the proper amount given their income. Yes, I think they should give regardless of whether they're going to be rewarded for it, but people who hoard THAT MUCH money are selfish, and they're not going to. My family is not even that rich (dad worth something in the 10s of millions) but the amount we give (no big deal for us) is ALREADY well above the amount you can deduct from taxes. And we don't mind, but the super rich? Do you think they're going to go out of their way to support causes with anything more than petty cash and not be rewarded for it? They're not.

Ultimately, they shouldn't have such extravagant amounts of money in the first place, since they didn't work for it. My dad, which I mentioned previously, works 10+ hours a day, often including weekends. That's real work. His field is high paid and he in particular is high paid since he's the only one who can do what he does, and he gets extra for INVENTING most of the things his companies are based on, which he, you know SPENDS TIME STUDYING AND WORKING ON AND CREATING. He's not making tons of money just by owning something. That's wrong. All that excess cash should be going to the people who actually do the work.

And I think for the most part everyone acknowledges this, but y'all talking about killing the 1% doesn't realize how broad the 1% is. That includes doctors, lawyers, high level computer scientists, that WORK for their living, and are not exploiting you. Who you're looking to target is the owners, the people who hoard billions or trillions of dollars in wealth. Do you even know how much a trillion is? Let's say you take a rich person worth about 10 million. Ok how much more does someone worth a trillion make? They make 100,000 times more. What can you afford these days with 10 million? A nice house, decent cars for the household members that drive, some land, the ability to not worry about medical bills and to pay for college, plus a bit extra to save or give to charity. How nice. A lot of people don't have that privilege. What about 1 trillion? There is not a house in existence that will make a dent in your finances. You could send your children to any college they want for their whole lives and not make a dent in your finances. You could buy companies on a whim with almost no consequence. It's not right. It's especially not right when other people have trouble paying for both rent and groceries.

If we redistributed the 8 richest people's wealth (the 8 of them have more money than the poorest HALF of the planet combined), you all could afford a home, food, a good education, and have a reasonable amount left over.

And this is why, even growing up rich, I'm such a communist. It is not a fever dream for us ALL to be able to live, comfortable, reasonable lives. The current wealth in the world redistributed, and suddenly everyone could live like I do. It isn't lessening the average person's quality of living. For the vast majority of us, communism done right is nothing but an upgrade. Yeah so a fistful of billionaires and trillionaires will be really upset. They'd still have enough to live comfortably and yet they're the ones who own so much they can effectively block any progress in this direction. It's pure selfishness.

This is how the James Web telescope works