I really think everyone needs to truly internalize this:
Fictional characters are objects.
They are not people. You cannot "objectify" them, because they have no personhood to be deprived of. They have no humanity to be erased. You cannot "disrespect" them, because they are not real.
an actual interaction ft. my sibling
reblog with reasons in the tags!
*ignore the grammer error in the title, itâs supposed to say âis the mostâ dijdkdksk
this is super random but i have an oc with ur name so instant follow from me ^_^
awww thanks :) yeah itâs a pretty name
table of contents : context : moral arguments : addressing the legal side of things : closing remarks
Context
on March 17, 2018, mxtx posted:
âAs long as you don't split or reverse the top/bottom positions of the main couple, I won't mind what you ship. I myself have a lot of fun shipping couples in mainstream shows, and isn't reading all about finding joy? You can imagine freely or ship whoever you like, just don't break up or reverse the top/bottom positions of the main couple.â
(I realise that the ä¸ćä¸é âno splitting or reversingâ rule might be implicit within the entire Chinese danmei fandom, so i do not wish to single mxtx out. for example, i know that Chinese 2ha fans also go around policing people who ship, say, chu wanning with shi mei â so this isnât just a mxtx thing. although i do not know if other danmei authors have explicitly stated âno splitting or reversingâ since i have not been a part of other danmei fandoms.)
Nevertheless, âno splitting or reversingâ became the constitution in Chinese mxtx fandom. Fans parade around with the slogan âćéćťâ which means âkill yourself if you split or reverseâ. Since the pronunciation of ćéćť (chai-ni-si) sounds like âchineseâ, some fans on the Chinese internet have been putting âchineseâ in their bios to mean âkill yourself if you split or reverseâ.
From now on I will be referring to split/reverse ships as cult ships, as Chinese fans like to call them.
There are two main consequences of the âno splitting or reversingâ rule (on the Chinese internet):
You will receive permanent bans with no option for appeal if you post cult ship fanworks in the novel communities on Weibo
It is implicitly agreed upon that you are not allowed to use individual character tags, the novel tag, or the author tag when posting cult ship content on any platform. So, for example, if you write Wei Wuxian x Jiang Cheng, you are not allowed to use #weiwuxian #jiangcheng #mdzs #mxtx. The name given to this conduct of tagging only your cult ship is ĺĺ°čŞč, which means âenclose a piece of land and amuse oneself within itâ. You are not allowed to step out of your land.Â
However, not everyone agrees with the practice of âdonât step out of your landâ â this includes people from both sides of the debate. Some official shippers believe that cult shippers should not have any land to begin with, and purposefully leave the cult ship tag unblocked so they can police cult shippers at every opportunity. Some cult shippers believe that because their ship involves the individual characters, originate from the novel written by the author, they are in the right to use the individual character tags, the novel tag, and the author tag, and that people who dislike their ship should just use the block function.Â
-
Moral Arguments
There are two main types of moral arguments that Chinese official shippers make.
1. If you split the official ship, you condone cheating behaviour and that makes you a bad person.
The first argument is too trivial so I will leave the refutation as an exercise for the reader to do at home /j
2. You are not respecting the author's wishes and that makes you a bad person.
The author has wished many different things. For example:
Screenshot 1 translation: I strictly forbid any crowdfunding or fundraising related to me, my works, or my characters, regardless of the purpose, whether it be for celebration, group buying, rankings, charity, or any other named activities.
Screenshot 2 translation: Once again, I emphasize: No new social media pages related to my works are allowed, nor organizing readers in a roundabout way, whether it be for celebrations, group buying, rankings, charity, or any other named activities. Please also refrain from flamboyantly organizing any collective birthday events.
Screenshot 3 translation: I've repeated many things many times and do not wish to repeat myself. Could everyone please just listen to my words occasionally.
(A brief aside before I address the second argument, something I used to say when debating Chinese fans: âI donât think people who violate the author's wishes mean any disrespect. I donât think theyâre shipping or hosting charity events or birthday parties out of spite, but rather, it just so happens that the author prohibits a ship they enjoy or an event they organise. Just because I cult ship, for example, doesnât mean I hate the author.â And they would respond: âif you really liked the author, you wouldnât go against her wishes. You do not deserve to like the author. You are a mxtx anti.â And I would say, âI like my mom a lot, but I wonât listen to everything she says, simply because I donât think everything she says is right. Plus, I donât think the world can simply be explained by like vs. dislike. Also, Xie Lian said this: [For instance, if you admire or like someone, you won't always treat them well, no matter what happens.]â But then the most hilarious thing happened, in the revised version, a rebuttal for that scene was added:
ăâFor instance, if you admire or like someone, it doesn't mean you will always treat them well, regardless of what happens."
"Why not?" San Lang questioned. "If that's not possible, it only shows that this so-called 'liking' isn't anything significant."
Xie Lian shifted the conversation, asking, "Then... does it mean that aside from liking someone, the only other option is to dislike them? Are these the only two attitudes one can choose from?"
San Lang chuckled and retorted, "Why not? Right is right, wrong is wrong. To love is to love, to hate is to hate. Why can't things be clear and straightforward?âă
⌠ah.)
To address the second argument for real, i believe that producers retain no moral authority over the methods by which consumers engage with their products. for instance, i believe that choosing not to follow the official âtwist, lick, and dunkâ method when eating oreos does not constitute disrespect towards the oreo brand. Or to use another analogy, suppose a farmer selling apples insist that you peel the apples before eating them. I believe that it does not make you a bad person if you choose to eat the apples unpeeled, despite the farmer being the one who watered and harvested the apples from their trees.
I am thinking of potential counterarguments, and the strongest one I came up with is: âbut products like oreos and apples are fundamentally different from intellectual property.â And I think the main issue here is that, to employ economics terminology, the content of novels like tgcf is a non-rivalrous good (not the novels themselves but the abstract content), which means that my consumption of it does not reduce availability to others. In other words, unlike Oreos or apples wherein after I purchase them, the specific items I bought are no longer physically in the hands of the vendor; after encountering characters like Shen Qingqiu, Shen Qingqiu still exists abstractly in MXTXâs head. This gives the illusion of ownership on the authorâs part. I want to be very careful here because I think itâs easy to equivocate between different uses of the word âownershipâ. I am not arguing that the author fails to retain ownership in negation of all the blood, sweat, and tears that went into the creative process, i.e. their copyright. Instead, I am contending that, just as I paid for my Oreos and apples, upon my purchasing of the Seven Seas version, the paperback Chinese version, and the revised uncensored version of TGCF on JJWXC, the author does not own the ways by which I choose to engage with these fictional entities. Once a work is made public, its ontology becomes independent of the authorâs intent, and in all its readersâ heads exist distinct versions of the characters, in effect making them belong to all of us.
(There. As a bonus I have also resolved the issue of not being âchineseâ enough. Ah, is this a bad place to make a communism joke?)
Addressing the legal side of things
In 2022 I wrote to the legal team at AO3, and here is their response:
Regarding the âmoral rightsâ, thatâs actually a thing. Upon receiving lots of spam from 12-yr-old readers that âyou are breaking the lawâ, I did a quick Baidu search (Chinaâs Google) concerning the legality of splitting/reversing ships. Surprisingly, the search results yield âyes, itâs illegalâ, and hence the 12-yr-olds' confidence. But that is akin to getting a cancer diagnosis from searching symptoms on Google. So I dug deeper.Â
After reading tens of published papers and court cases, here are the key takeaways of what I found:
Given that intellectual property rights are a bit behind in China, they have largely based their laws on US copyright law. As organizations like OTW continue to fight for the rights of transformative works in the US, China probably will just follow suit.
The semantics of âdistort, mutilate, or otherwise harm the integrity of their works in a way that harms the authorâs reputationâ is very vague and debatable. There are at least three ways to interpret it (I think one of the papers I read offered four). The first is that they only have to prove that you distorted the integrity of the work. The second is that you satisfy the condition of harming the authorâs reputation. The third is that you satisfy both conditions (integrity of work and authorâs reputation). It depends on the court.Â
None of the court cases pertained to unserious, just-for-fun fan works. Usually what happens is someone makes a film out canon, for example, and sell it for profit, or someone publishes their own novel which contains characters from another published work.Â
And that is for China only^ if you live outside of China, you are under another country's jurisdiction.
-
Closing remarks
I am addressing this issue because it has impacted me and my friends in many ways. "kill yourself if you split/reverse the official ship" is probably the least of our concerns, mainly because it is such a popular phrase that we've become desensitized to it. @/Eleven receives private messages on Lofter on a weekly basis of people wishing her entire family to get murdered. A hualian main friend of mine has been posted to Weibo for following me; and I had to pull a Shi Qingxuan with "hey let's not be friends anymore if being associated with me is gonna get you cancelled".
mxtx has been through a lot and i understand where she's coming from. and maybe, the people who identify as "kill yourself if you split/reverse the official ship" don't truly mean it -- maybe they're just expressing their love for the official ship.
Recently i've been seeing the sentiments I used to only witness in Chinese fandom surface on Twitter and sometimes I worry that western mxtx fandom is going to turn into Chinese mxtx fandom, with the in-group/out-group mentality -- you're either with us or against us. At the end of the day, I do like mxtx, I admire her tenacity and I think she's a brilliant author, I love her works and the characters in them. I simply do not want to be backed into the corner of "anti" due to not following every order she gives.
çĽĺ˘¨éŚĺ弚çç˛ä¸äťŹĺšłĺŽă
MXTXâs tentative novel: Death Gods Donât Get Rest Days
Itâs a suspense novel set in modern times!
The first chapter hasnât been uploaded yet, but there is a novel description
Translation of novel desc:
What do to if your boyfriendâs too bad
â This name is tentative, the official novel name will be changed, sorry to trouble everyone m(_ _)m
⢠International Practice, 1V1, Shou POV, HE.
⢠Heads-up: Completely Fictitious
⢠Anthology series, master plot. In addition, it will definitely be revealed, everything will change before it is revealed.
Everything is possible!!!
Concept (of the novel): Concept to be supplemented
Tags: Supernatural, Match Made in Heaven, Modern (place unspecified), Suspense, Drama
Main Characters: Yan Yue, Qiu Chi
Supporting Characters: Murderer, Victim, Melon-Eater (aka the person who views on the sidelines and doesnât do anything)
Others: Qiu Chi x Yan Yue
POV: Shou POV
Hi there đ,
My name is Mohammad, a father of three young children living in Gaza. We are facing unimaginable hardships due to the ongoing catastrophic war, and our home is no longer safe. Iâve started a fundraising to raise $40,000 to move my family to a safer place where my children can have a chance at a better future. đđ
If you could spare a moment to read our story and consider donating or even sharing, it would mean the world to us. Every bit of support brings us closer to safety and hope. đ
Thank you for your kindness and compassion. â¤
https://gofund.me/fd1faea2 đ
â¤ď¸
should probably rework my tumblr and sort everything out in tags lol
(qiĹŤ lĂn): autumn rainqiu (they/any): sqx fannovels + podcasts mostly
259 posts