Skimbledankstheradicalcat - Messy

Tiny trees tiny trees tiny trees

if i was a casting director who saw the description of a catholic cardinal as young and boyish even at 67 i would have said fuck awwwfffff and given up. but thats not what the casting director of conclave said,,, they knew he was out there

Moon Bunny Hinata watching a boy on earth and wanting so badly to talk to him…. but she's too shy to go down and talk to him 😔

jesus no

"Men in dresses are seen as bad, but women in pants aren't!"

is not the statement that "men can't be feminine but women can be masculine in society" that you think it is.

Let me introduce: women with facial hair. Full beards. Mustaches. Bald women. Bodybuilder women. Women with visible body hair. These aren't "more acceptable" than men in dresses.

Pants don't have a gendered association anymore, while dresses do. There is something to be said for that, but it certainly ISN'T "masculine women are acceptable now."

So which is it? Is AI useless or so effective it will destroy creatives? Is the enemy strong or weak?

Ok first of all why are you referencing Ur Fascism to debate me on AI? Secondly, AI will not take people's jobs (creative or otherwise) because it is effective, it's taking jobs because a lot of wealthy and powerful people *think* it's effective, or, at the very least, that it will be any day now and they need to get in on the ground floor. The idea of Generative AI being the future is 100% salesmanship by a few companies selling snake oil but unfortunately for the rest of us the snake oil business is booming rn

“having sex is not all there is to lgbtq+ people and our identities. we aren’t inherently any more sexual than cishets and asexuals also exist” and “having sex is one of the most demonised parts of our community and it should not be so much of a taboo” are two concepts that can and should co-exist