This Man Brings The Receipts Against The School Board.

SAY HIS NAME: #CaylerEllingson. This 18 yr old boy’s death is on Joe Biden’s bloody hands.

Cayler was murdered by a leftist who told police it was because “the teen was part of a Republican extremist group.”

#Biden just weeks ago: “MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic.” https://www.instagram.com/p/CiyKcdLvUeQ/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Will Decide Whether Americans Can Go to Protests They Disagree With and Murder People

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Will Decide Whether Americans Can Go to Protests They Disagree With and Murder People

One thing to consider is what happens when the shoe is on the other foot. Daniel Alan Baker was convicted of threats against protesters. He wanted people to bring guns to the Florida statehouse to defend against MAGA attacks on our democracy. He was convicted of threats. Kyle Rittenhouse went to a protest he was ideologically opposed to and shot three people. The case’s decision has implications…

View On WordPress

Kamala Harris is the “Flip flop Czar”

— Scott Shellady, The Cow Guy

Sleepy Joy and ScamAla Hurts accomplishments!

VOTE TRUMP 2024

When it’s important to you. You find a way ❤

ICE DIRECTOR: 13k migrants convicted of MURDER have been caught at the border and RELEASED into the United States. 🤔

Why There Was No Crime

Committed by Trump

Per Bradley Smith, former head of the Federal Election Commission.... So he's probably a top expert, if not the leading expert, on election law and campaign contributions but was not allowed to testify by the judge.

"...The payment made to adult performer Stephanie Clifford, known better by her stage name, Stormy Daniels, by ex-lawyer Michael Cohen on Oct. 27, 2016, was not reported as a campaign expenditure, but even if it was, it would not have been reported until weeks after the election, in a Dec. 8, 2016, Post-Election Report, Mr. Smith explained.

“So the prosecution’s theory, that Trump wanted to hide the expenditure until after the election, MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL,” Mr. Smith wrote.....FECA allows a candidate to contribute an unlimited amount to his own campaign, Mr. Smith argued in a separate thread, meaning that if the $130,000 had been reimbursed IT COULD NOT HAVE VIOLATED CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW. He explained the official test of a campaign contribution was whether that money would have been spent if there was no campaign...“I’m not a criminal law guy. But I do know campaign finance law. The failure to properly instruct the jury on the law would seem to be reversible error,” he wrote.

“There was NO ILLEGAL CONTRIBUTION OR EXPENDITURE MADE, and NO FAILURE TO REPORT an expenditure. And even if we assume otherwise, the prosecution’s theory MADE NO SENSE, suggesting no criminal intent....”

Epoch Times

Cause it’s not actually about the cows