To those who insist Taylor is referring to herself when she says "argumentative antithetical dream girl"…. in what universe would she be so egotistical as to proclaim herself a dream girl, especially when: 1. She already clearly referred to her muse just three lines earlier when she said "dreams of your hair and your stare and sense of belief"
2. She already clearly referred to herself as "an asshole outlaw" in the previous verse
Whether or not anyone from Taylor’s team actually spoke to CNN about the NYT article, let’s all be reminded that:
* Nobody speculated on Taylor’s sexuality. The author points out various ways in which Taylor flags queerness in her art and that suggests to queer people that she may be one of us. That’s not a speculation, that’s fact.
* The article is also largely about closeting in the entertainment industry. And that’s still very common (also fact) whether you like it or not.
* This beautifully written and heartfelt article makes a point for the kind of world that queer people deserve to live in. If you call that ‘inappropriate’ I think that says a lot…
And maybe most importantly: IF SHE WAS AN ALLY SHE WOULD NOT BE OFFENDED TO BE ASSUMED QUEER! Being gay is not offensive and if you think otherwise, that’s homophobia.
At no point does the author dig into her muses or speculate on who she might be dating. That’s a level of journalistic professionalism that a lot of lesser publications could learn from.
Anna Marks (if that is your name) you are a brilliant writer and journalist, and I hope you do not take any criticism from old white men on CNN!
Always support the 3 G's
The girls, the gays and the goths
August 9, 2023 - New Romantics - Los Angeles (Karlie's show)
(x) Baby, we're the new romantics 🥹
The rumors are terrible and cruel But honey, most of them are true
"1989 (Taylor's Version)" will be released on October 27, 2023 💙💙💙
reblog to claim og wonderland stan status before tay’s version goes absolutely insanely crazyyy that song will never be background material she deserves front center
disclaimer: this is my personal take on it. feel free to add onto this theory if i’ve missed anything!
so… has Karlie Kloss already heard 1989 tv? could Thrills be a vault track? was her attendance at the eras tour planned by taylor and herself?
“thrills 💙🎧🔁” -> blue heart emoji (blue = 1989), all blue outfit, headphones & loop emojis… could Thrills possibly be a vault track on 1989 Taylor’s Version?
she reveals the release date to be 10/27, the same release date as 1989 (stolen version).
this is the first (public) Kaylor interaction in 6 years. here she is seen happily taking pictures with fans. Reminder, she was a very important figure during the 1989 era.
it’s just too perfect to be a coincidence.
Karlie and Taylor took this infamous road trip, which was pretty much the birth place of some of the most popular kaylor references/theories.
this is what pops up on google… a song called Big Sur… by a band called The Thrills… interesting.
on their California road trip, taylor showed 1989 (stolen version) to Karlie. she was the first person to hear the album in its entirety.
is history repeating itself? was Karlie Kloss the first person to hear 1989 (taylor’s version)? is Thrills a vault track? why do so many things line up? what does it all mean? so. many. questions.
People always dump on Taylor for looking after her own interests but by god she was being super brave to speak out against that man when NO ONE ELSE would. She could only do so much but…she tried, you know. Over and over she uses her platform to speak up about stuff no one else dares to (Apple Music letter, for example) and people shit on her for it only to find out years later she was just ahead of her time…again.
every single time
I’m not laughing anymore this is scary
Cat with no trust issues