Sky News Report Shows How The Markaz Taiba Mosque, Which India Destroyed During The Operation Sindoor,

Pakistani military targeting civilians in Jammu and Kashmir 💔

yeah, I realise it's just pointless.

I don't know why I was trying to convince someone whose stance is 'yay innocent Indians died for the cause of a terrorist groups' resistance' of anything.

It's the 'Why were you there huh? If you go there it's allowed for a terrorist group to kill you, you know' vibe. Just...yikes.

not even hiding it anymore, i see

Pakistan has violated the ceasefire. And here's Western media sources covering it for all the white saviours.

the Guardian

India and Pakistan ceasefire agreement in jeopardy after cross-border shelling

Trump announced breakthrough after talks apparently secured by secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and vice-president, JD Vance

nytimes.com

India and Pakistan Announce Cease-Fire: Live Updates

The truce came after several days of the countries’ most expansive fighting in decades. But there were reports of some continuing violence.

Yess it's confirmed, my friend from Akhnoor is telling me all of it

Fuck. Please stay safe, tell your friend to evacuate once they can and please keep in contact with them. Pakistan is such a fucking menace. 🤢

India did it again. Their cowardice is out of this world. Targeting a mosque? That too in the dead of night? Going the Israel route I see. Like master like pet ig.

And also what I find hilarious is Terrorists coming in to Indian borders, attacking tourists, fucking civilian tourists (Hindus), telling them to recite Kalma or whatever that is to prove they’re Muslim, checking their Penis to see if they’re circumsised, and then killing 27 people. India attacking the same terrorist camps is such a problem? Go die 💀

fatima aamer bilal, excerpt from moony moonless sky’s ‘i mother it, the absence of her ii. i was hard to bear from the very start.’

Sorry for some of the AI-speakensese below, I'm using ChatGPT to clean up my words here

By "standards of neutrality," I mean the way some people claim to be neutral when discussing India-Pakistan issues but seem to automatically frame India’s actions—like defending its borders or responding to attacks—as “invading” or aggressing against Pakistan. It’s like their baseline for “neutral” assumes India is always the instigator, ignoring context like cross-border militancy or provocations. I’m calling out that double standard where “neutrality” feels skewed against India.

I meant to share the NY Times article as a source with this standard of neutrality for people who read the posts that show India's side and immediately screen "oh but where is the 'neutral' Western media coverage for it?"

so that's what happened

one of these days yeh america ka ladla beta pakistan hamare haath se bohot buri tarah se pitega

why do the people with this stance justify the killing of innocent civilians in Pahalgam as 'well what did you expect when the govt occupied it'?

Setting aside the belligerent stupidity of the occupation nonsense, who made these people the incharge of deciding 25 Indians and 1 Nepali citizens were a-okay to kill because of a terrorist groups' crusade against the government if this is their stance on Pakistani civilians? Where was the outrage for the terorrists killing people instead of sending a strongly worded letter to the UN or whatever the hell you are expecting India to do in response to the killing of innocents?

My guy, either no civilians are fair game or all are. You don't get to decide Indian and Nepali lives matter less than your problematic faves lives. You're the one who started the grandstanding, at least stick to it.

terrorism isn't the fault of a state or its government though. just because terrorists allegedly from a given country carried out an attack doesn't really justify a military operation in that country. especially if everyone is opposed to those terrorists

Terrorism is not the fault of the helpless civilians of the state who are equally affected by it. However, terrorism is the fault of the government of the state, that continues to take no action and instead provide training to the terrorists, putting not only their country but countless innocent civilians - who despise terrorism as much - at risk. The attack - not only Pahalgam but countless cases of cross border terrorism which average atleast 2 incidents a year weren't "allegedly" from a specific country. Terror groups from within thay country have taken responsibility for most of the attacks including Pahalgam. Military operation has to be proceeded with if the terror harbouring country has been given numerous chances to combat and eliminate the terrorism on their own but have failed to do so over and over again and instead provide increased support. I understand that the Pakistani civilians don't like terrorism as much people think they do, because the rising levels of terrorism has an adverse effect on them as well but their own government and military has to understand this as well and work according to the needs of their people instead of inviting even more trouble.

Regional War Speedrun edition?

Donald Trump just posted that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire.

“the only right answer is my answer”

The way people see stories of Muslims being denied services after the Kashmir shit and say, "What terrible people, treating random Muslims like they had anything to do with that" and they're the same ones who were blatantly saying shit like "If this is how JEWS treat people, then I don't care about being called an antisemite!" like HELLOOOOO??? CAN ANYONE HEAR ME OR IS THE BRRRRRRR OF COGNITIVE DISSONANCE DROWNING ME OUT?

“MY bigotry is acceptable and it doesn’t make me evil!”