If you hate trans men, I hope every woman you look up to in your life transitions into the happiest, hairiest, fattest trans men ever.
not the same anon but here's a post with screenshots of a blatantly transmisogynistic ask that genderqueerdykes completely agreed with. pretty certain the original post was deleted after backlash
https://www.tumblr.com/coremilk/774757128066957312/pretend-you-didnt-see-that-this-is-a-level-of?source=share
Yeesh, thank you. I will unfollow them now. Thanks y'all for keeping us on our toes.
So I kind of want to unpack this because it's phrased like the literary equivilant of barbed wire and people keep getting caught on snags. And what is being said here is heinous enough that I think it should be presented plainly
(A solid post on the topic here by @velvetvexations, who got into the psychology of it. I wanted to expand from a logic/phrasing perspective)
Lets tackle that second paragraph piece by piece
First, this sentence which is objectively true. Cisgender perisex* women have systematic cisgender privilege, so, for example they aren't affected by things like restrictions on access to HRT/Transition Surgery or being forcibly outed to transphobic individuals or institutions. While they can still experience individual transphobia(see gnc presenting individuals), they still have access to that systemic cisgender privilege. I just want to put a pin in the fact that this is true of all cis people over all trans people. Trans people of any kind do not have cis privilege, because they are not cis. Including closeted and stealth trans individuals. To use my own example, both of them would be affected by restrictions to HRT access, even if they are "percieved" as cis.
So when I say cis privilege later on keep all that in mind
Statement A: Cis women have privilege over trans women
*I am not intersex, it is just my understanding from reading intersex individuals experiences that while intersex people can be cis, they do not have access to the cisgender privilege outlined here. Please correct me if I am wrong
She says this to deflect from the fact that that is the conclusion she is directly going to build to. It's about the same as saying "I'm not saying men of color are uniquely violent, I'm just pointing out that statistically they commit most crime"
Now lets unpack the less straightforward part
A reminder: this isn't about closeted trans men. It would still be reductive if it were, but look back at the original ask. This is about all non-passing trans men
(Though both the asker and answerer seem to use "passing" as a synonym for "stealth". you can pass but not be stealth, plenty of trans people are out publically)
(An aside: The language the asker uses here seems pretty suspect, treating "non-passing" as identical to being percieved as cis. While we could argue that they meant closeted, the answerer does not contest this point and instead uses it as the base to opine on trans men as a whole, so I am going to make the assumption that she is in agreement with the base premise)
Statement B: All non-passing trans men are percieved and treated identically to cis women.
As noted re:the askers uncontested language, this group seems to include trans men at any stage of transition. Either they pass as men or they are considered cis women, with no inbetween.
Statement C: This is a privilege
Statement C is one of the snags here, because the answerer uses "male privilege" here, which when combined with Statement B can be read as "cis women have male privilege", which is absurd. But thats a snag, the meat of the statement is different. She's calling it male privilege but goes on to define it as a privilege specifically and exclusively trans women don't have, which isn't what male privilege is(see: cis women). Why she is using the phrase wrong I don't know, but lets just simplify it down to what Statement C says: it is a privilege of some form. We will get into the form
Statement D: Trans women do not have this privilege because they are seen as trans
So the privilege is conferred based on being cis(or the appearance of), and non-passing trans men have it because they are "only" seen as functionally identical to cis women.
So, trans women lack this privilege because they are discriminated against on the basis of being seen as trans specifically, while trans men have it because they are seen as cis. Discrimination based on being trans is transphobia.
Statement E: Trans men do not experience transphobia because they are seen as cis
Consider in the context of the first statement. Cis women have privilege over trans women. Trans men have privilege over trans women because cis women have privilege over trans women. Cis women have this privilege because they are cis, so calling it male privilege was an obfuscation
And this part puts to bed the whole "maybe they meant closeted" arguement. The answerer identifies that the privilege specifically stems from transmasculinity.
Thus,
Statement F: All trans men, regardless of the stage of transition, are seen as cis because they are transmasculine.
Conclusion: Trans men have cis privilege
Do we see how this arguement has become completely disconnected from reality yet?
And this isn't part of the original exchange, but I wanted to quickly discuss this bit
"May have been traumatic and horrible for you"
"You still get to be one"
Look at the phrasing here. You still "get" to be one. Womenhood is the ideal state which confers privilege and is inherently desirable. If you don't want it, there is something wrong with you specifically. Womanhood cannot be traumatizing on its own merits, it can only be traumatizing because you are broken in some way and can't appreciate how good it is.
In a quick two sentences, it makes clear the incredibly cruel statement "misgendering is a privilege. you should be grateful they are doing this to you"
Official Japan Exclusive, GBA (Game Boy Advance) Celebi Console released in 2001
I've been constantly accused of being trans for sex reasons since I was like 12 (and so have so many trans men and mascs I know!) so I just do NOT believe that autoandrophilia is applied to transmascs less. on a personal level, I just don't talk about it because no one ever takes me seriously which seems indicative of a problem imo
we might be dangerously close to acknowledging trans men also face challenges in society
People who say that trans people need to learn 'basic biology' are usually uneducated and relying on simplified and unnuanced definitions which they use as catchphrases. 'Men have xy, women have xx, its just common sense'
People who say trans men need to learn 'basic feminism' are usually uneducated and relying on simplified and unnuanced definitions which they use as catchphrases. 'Men are privileged oppressor, women are oppressed, its just common sense'
why are people so willing to throw young transmascs under the bus :( feels like our own community still sees us as hysterical girls that can’t be trusted to make our own choices
the spectre of "transmasculinity as a disease which corrupts the purity of cis girlhood" remains strong I see.
Also "testosterone works just as well at 25" GIRL THE GROWTH PLATES. GIRL THE HIP BONES.
slug & snail nails by annaxnailz
Post too much sad shit I should go on an aesthetic spree
whatever i don't wanna post to main for whatever reason. expect lots of aesthetic posts and heavy/controversial topics ig.
193 posts