If you're a feminist who actually wants change, I imagine you ought to be less worried about alienating the average women in heterosexual relationships who are very likely to prioritise their relationships with a man (close, personal, comfortable) over any cause (faraway, oppositional, risky, unknown), and more worried about alienating heterosexual women who are on the fence or already celibate and separatist.
But no, feminists are entertaining inter-feminist discussions about ridiculous notions such as "heterophobia," about how unfair it is that lesbians are supposedly having marathon sex on the daily who stop heterosexual women from having sex with statistically-proven-to-be-dangerous men, and being accommodating of downright embarrassing behaviour from women who are wailing about how badly they want to suck cock.
oh my god they’re violating human rights? oh wait that’s part of their religious beliefs <3 wow i love diverse cultures where women are treated worse than cattle!! a beautiful multicultural tapestry of society yaaaas
Another heterosexual humiliation ritual in which women attempt to “bash” men by publicly admitting to sleeping with them. No wonder men have humongous egos, why wouldn’t they? You can resemble the Mucinex Man monster, stink from not wiping properly, make empty promises, and women will derail their lives for you.
Women give up everything in the hopes that men will fulfill fairytale promises. We will call men ridiculous for believing pornography accurately reflects reality, but let women forever be influenced by Disney films they watched as children. Just as women aren’t comparable to the adult actresses being paid to perform fantasies, neither are men going to be Prince Charming.
Women are going to continue auditioning themselves and pledging allegiance to users, so ignore the blame game they participate in once it inevitably ends. Remember this is a bonding activity that women in relationships partake in, seeking to normalize such behavior. If female socialization is to be undone, no more making light of terrible life choices, or publicly announcing stupidity.
Call me a puritan or a label me a misogynist, but I don't care about a woman's "human need" to sleep with multiple strange men. To me, it's just as selfish and reckless as men hopping from woman to woman creating children that will end up unloved or abandoned. I'm first and foremost an antinatalist at heart and the "sexual liberation" movement is a major detriment to society and the children that spawn from it. Especially when these men are literally telling you, "I don't care about you or any baby that results from this exchange; I just want to use your body for my pleasure".
I irk at the name of feminism when I hear it from anybody. It has totally lost its menaing and means nothing anymore.
Now they are doing the same with radical feminism. Raddies with boyfriends are main center of feminism. They wanna endlessly analyse male nature only to end up breeding with them and spawning new males. This makes sense why black pilled women don't wanna associate with radfems anymore.
Reformist women and hetfems have started to colonise radfem spaces and diluting the actual meaning. You get to see women who believe in socialisation theory and giving out "harm reduction" tips. If they really wanted safety for the woman then they would have asked her to abandon their moid.
There's too many handmaidens. I mean there is a reason why we have talks here that ask to center mothers and how bEauTifUl motherhood is.
What was the last straw on the back of the camel was the apparent lesbophobia from these same women.
From "radblr hates straight women" to "lesbians shouldn't talk about separatism". When lesbians already face double (or even triple) oppression. They think lesbians are having "sex parties" and how unfair it is for straight women to not "enjoy" intimacy. Lol. Let's assume all homophobia from world is eliminated and even then our dating pool is so small. We have to be single for years.
Honestly, I'm starting to doubt that radical feminism was even "colonized" by male lovers. Seems to me that the majority of the big radfems love males anyway. (Any truly liberated women that feel that it's their movement, and they feel betrayed by this, I get that as well.) But feminism as a whole is very difficult to truly shape into a revolutionary movement because it requires the hatred or the very least the absence of love for males, but with 99% of women truly loving them until their dying breath, we cannot move in any meaningful way.
"You can't blame that woman for what she did, she was conditioned to behave that way by the patriarchy!" (Radfems whenever they arbitrarily decide to remove agency from certain women and not others.)
Why does that matter? Nearly everything we think is a result of conditioning.
Our conditioning determines whether we stuff ourselves past the point of hunger because there's still food on our plate, and we were taught it's wrong to ever waste it.
Or if we think it's okay for parents to belt their children as a form of punishment, or for a husband to apply "domestic discipline" to keep his wife in line.
Or if we believe elders deserve a heightened level of respect.
Or if we think homosexuality is a sin based on what religion we were brought up in.
We are initially handed all of our beliefs by someone else, and when we reach the age of reason we are responsible for choosing for ourselves whether they're correct or not. Hear me, hypocrites: 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴!
Would you give your homophobic boomer neighbor a pass for their beliefs? Why not? They're only acting from their conditioning, and that makes them blameless for what they continue to believe, correct?
If a parent dragged their kids to church and terrorized them with the threat of hellfire and damnation if they didn't get right with God, you wouldn't blame them according to your principles, right? They're only repeating what their parents said, who repeated what their parents said, and so on. Why would you expect them to think for themselves and break the cycle when you don't expect the same from women?
Or is it that you're actually just a walking stereotype of the way women are supposedly allergic to reason, logic, and accountability, because the only people who you believe aren't responsible for overcoming their conditioning are women?
👆 Radfems embody this stereotype, and CLEARLY that doesn't embarrass them, but it does embarrass me and other women who try to apply our principles consistently. That's why I distanced myself. We are not the same.