What The FUCK Is Wrong With You I Was Literally Forced To Join The Imperialism Genocide Squad Just So

Nobody on radblr ever goes "hm. female socialization is so prevalent and suffocating that certain women will rebel against it and look down on women perpetuating it. We need to be considerate of them too. #all women are my sisters"

It only gets mentioned in the context of "be considerate and say nothing against str8 momma #16781265829^10 who is doing everything patriarchy wants her to even if it's throwing you under the bus"

hm. so interesting

“Not every person has the right to be a parent” is a sentiment I feel is widely accepted in leftist circles, referring largely to abusive households. But this doesn’t get taken to condemn surrogacy and egg-donating industries. Like Jesus Christ why do most leftists not care about this flavor of stuff when it financially exploits women, and subjects them to unnecessary harm? All just because it means infertile women and homosexual couples can have a different way to have children to raise? What happened to “having children isn’t a guaranteed right” Of course I know it’s because of misogyny, but good grief.

Visual representation of common sense.

For this to be true, heterosexuality as a whole would have to be challenged. That includes non heteros who seek to mimic such dynamics. We all know that won’t happen though. An actual feminist would protect children by demanding the porn watching father be removed from the house. Boy children wouldn’t be allowed preferential treatment. Mothers who bought their daughters razors and lipstick could be called out for grooming the next generation. Your desire to have babies with degenerate losers would no longer be enabled. We all know how that would go.

This is another call to extract resources from sovereign women. Who would only be further ostracized and ridiculed by the same women asking for help, if they actually delivered proper treatment. Women insist on cohabiting and procreating with the same half of the population they become paranoid about leaving their children with. Most women will eventually settle with a man and become pregnant. Meaning most men will be chosen by women. Yet, they’d never ask men as a collective to care for kids.

How does that work exactly? Most men have women willing to vouch for them and co-sign their social “safeness” by partnering up, but they’re still not fully trusted. If men are worthy of sleeping with and birthing, there should be no reason to fear their presence so much. These women would never call on men to protect every child they see, as most can barely be present for their own. Women reduce themselves to being incubators for predators, and want those who are free to be even lower than themselves. You’re the predator and groomers babysitter.

Question a mother on anything and watch her reaction. Try and instill actual feminist principles into children, especially daughters, and prepare to be torn a new one. More women will accuse you of malicious intent for letting their daughters know the truth about marriage and procreation, than they would for their beloved husband with “young” in his search history. If protecting children was considered important, majority of the population wouldn’t be here today.

Cat calling typically begins to happen for girls at age 10. 18 and under is when most abuse and assault takes place. Gendered grooming starts when the sonographer accurately reports a baby’s sex, with most women hoping for a son. Boy children are revered, and adult men are worshipped. If women continue to insist on bringing more children here, they shouldn’t require backup, as there’s no higher endorsement of our world than furthering it.

This is a losing game. Women know men are going to continue preying on children, even the ones they help make. Instead of swallowing their cognitive dissonance, they’ll blame unburdened women for continually failing. In the same way non lesbians employ homophobia the moment their lapdogs won’t defend, or excuse their dealings with men. CPS already exists, and is looked down upon. If child well fare were to be societally acted upon, no more than %2 of the population could parent.

You will do more to protect kids by never birthing them into our Earths low vibrational circumstances, and leading by example through freedom. A million man lovers could pitch into communal nurturing, making the world an even less safe place. While one highly functioning woman with the capacity to reason, discern her environment, and put logic over idealistic thoughts, would make more of a difference. Even if only once. You co create reality with your actions. Helping husband and wife only furthers their misery making. Keep children safe by refusing to succumb to societal guilt tripping by the child endangering masses,

"i can't benefit from oppressive power structures, i'm literally nice :)" is a disturbingly common sentiment on here and if u express it then i can never trust u again

the average man acts like a spoiled petulant disrespectful toddler because his parents and society let him do whatever he wants and men stop mentally maturing once they turn 3. you can't tell men "no" without them having a tantrum. you can't do your own thing without them butting in and disturbing your peace. you can't have fun without them because it hurts their feefees when you don't acknowledge them for one second. none of this would be an issue if the world wasn't so androcentric and if everybody realized men are too emotional to lead. they shouldn't even be allowed in public spaces due to how destructive they can be

No other women are more dangerous than the ones that put male validation above all else…

When I write about how much I love asexuality and celibacy, I always feel like I need to add a qualifier of "and there's nothing wrong with healthy sexual relations," etc. I'm not doing that anymore.

The entire world is obsessed with the carnal and cheers you on to objectify yourself and others in every way imaginable, 24/7, 365. If you want validation to do that, look in almost any direction at any time, because you'll most certainly find it from our very sick society. But you're not going to find it here.

It just hit me that women don't like choices.

Having choices means you make choices; Making choices means you take responsibility for that choice. Women don't want choices--so they shrug (or sigh in relief) when moids take it away.

tradfem conversations : "our purpose as women is to give birth and sexually satisfy our men."

"divine feminine" trogs: "women are life-giving goddesses. Our sexual influence over men is divine and sacred."

Same damn conversation, different language.

Y'all are both boring as fuck.