Things I Have Successfully Manifested Into 3D

I see

A lot of people talking about mars nakshatra but one thing about them is they care too much. LIKE TOO MUCH about everything and anything they human or humanly possible, which gets made fun of or dogged at but it’s truly a wonderful and good thing. Shows we are alive. They will literally cry with, for you and because of you. They are not as conniving naturally but are smart thru self preservation. Underneath all the battle warrior is a very soft sensitive being. They don't know how to but would benefit from emotional contention, from others. They really look for connection but don’t really know how, its kind of rowdy messy or all over. They are more (probably) emotional than moon nakshtaras

swear to God that i get accused and harassed just for caring and being passionate about people places and things. Like if you are about the truth your enemy #1.

They deal with alot mental health issues, well i notice alot of other nakshtaras do. But they want to be loved and notice/taken into account because they really do feel and experience life lowly until they rise. They get very immersed in Maya and their senses. They can’t be detached like Saturn, Sun or Ketu or attached for benefit like Venus, Moon, Mercury or Rahu. They kind of just attached because they can or feel the need to. They may not be as ”giving” but thats why they benefit from relationships with Jupiter or Venus (if Venus wants to) where they kind of learn from, Sun too maybe.

Literally me:

reports saying pakistan has retaliated. i'm sick to my fucking stomach the people of kashmir don't deserve this. the people of pakistan don't deserve this. no one fucking wants this except the hindutvadis salivating and falling over themselves at the notion of destroying muslims. fucking hell.

Love the word "also". I have more things to say

Rohini is the birth of Eve or the cosmic “woman” herself and Uttara Phalguni is her awakening. 🍎 🐍

———

UPH moon Doja Cat’s “Woman” is my theme song for this nakshatra. In the video, she also dresses as the Tree of Life (another name for the Banyan tree). It’s the tree which Adam and Eve ate off in the Garden of Eden in order to maintain immortality. In Tuck Everlasting, UPH sun Alexis Bledel must make the decision to drink from a tree to become immortal so she can live with her love interest (played by a Krittika native) forever. Krittika is Adam, immortal in the Garden of Eden, and that’s EXACTLY how this book/movie captures him.

It takes his father, played by a UBP (the funeral cot) sun, to teach her that death is part of the Circle of Life and that no life is worth living if it cannot end. He tells her this so that she doesn’t choose to remain immortal and stuck as a girl forever. He persuades her to grow older and create her own life and to not hold her life back for a boy who will forever be stuck unaware in the Garden of Eden (Krittika = Adam’s birth). This plot says a lot about Uttara Phalguni women in my opinion, and how they won’t let themselves be held back by anything including men. It also connects to how this nakshatra is all about growing up and how these natives, as children, oftentimes need guidance to grow up, especially from outside of their own family (usually their fathers are not present in some way. Look at Simba & Will from the Fresh Prince).

The Tree of Life connects to amrita (the Elixir of Life; immortality). Aryaman is King of the Immortal Ancestors, who are only immortal because their consciences are embedded within their descendant’s DNA. This ultimately alludes to the fact that our ancestors are simply past versions of ourselves, which is seen directly in the incredibly Uttara Phalguni coded chow Avatar. Aang is Uttara Phalguni DOWN to the point where he learns to align his chakras. Aryaman is the ruler of the sevenfold path towards enlightenment. He essentially represents manhood or the path of the Arya as well.

Uttara Phalguni is pure life force energy in the first pada. In the last three padas, it is life force energy growing on Earth (6H). It is the soul within us all. The collective conscious. That’s why these natives appeal to many. They are relatable and highly sought after in terms of status, creativity, success and they are also desired by many. It is also why they set trends and are “milked” by the industry. Think of Doja, who has called herself a “cash cow.” She is the only female rapper to give Nicki Mnja credit on a song outside of Megan. They’re both UPH moon. UPH is the beneficiary of the ancestor’s fruits. The descendant who inherits fruits from previous generations. Doja has even said this on “Attention.” Think of how Britney Spears was the first real, modern archetype of a “pop star.” After her era was over, it was Nicki Minaj who became the pop/rap mogul that created trends and styles that the masses highly enjoyed mimicking. These women’s consciousness are so creative and powerful that they create personas that the world loves to mimick and take inspiration from. That’s why they are the BLUEPRINT along with Krittika & UA. For every generation (UPH= generations) there is a famous Uttara Phalguni woman who enters the spotlight and amazes the masses with her unique identity and creativity which then churns their respective industry and inspires the world.

I’m really a Magha native cause if there is something that somebody is trying to compete with me or they want me to fight for, I will simply let them have it LMAO

I do not believe the things I want and that want me would have me out here going to war for it. It feels so low quality and creates a scarcity mindset where I don’t want that energy near me AT ALL. I will simply leave lol

In English we say "I can't make eye contact". But in Urdu, we say:

"Unki nazron ka rukh aaj meri taraf hai,

Aaj meri palkon ne uthne se inkaar kar diya hai".

SOOOOOO TRUE

I feel like people are naturally uninterested in the nakshatra of their ascendant because they are already the embodiment of that nakshatra as they interact through that nakshatra in the material world on a daily basis. We are more so hypnotized by and drawn to the nakshatra of our Sun, Moon, Ketu and Atmakaraka. Correct me if I’m wrong and let me know how YOU personally feel and why :)

why do men want to be gynecologists? why? why. gynecology is for females and should be practiced solely by women imo 

The Handmaid’s Tale is a NECESSARY watch to further understand Uttara Phalguni. The show is basically about men profiting off and milking women for children in order to create stronger societies; they trade women and use them as cattle for reproduction. On top of that, there is immense fruit symbolism in the show. Most of the cast have Uttara Phalguni, Pushya or Rohini placements. Uttara Phalguni deals with the oppression of women as “fruit-givers” aka all women being used for their precious, abundant life-force energy. Milked by society for their abundance yet abused and suppressed like they are nothing. Under these rigid roles, Uttara Phalguni women must use their power of seduction and their wit to outsmart the system and profit off it right back in order to obtain spiritual freedom.

Unconsciously, this is why a lot of Uttara Phalguni women would rather choose to stay away from the process of marriage and love because she believes most men are not spiritually awakened enough to treat her properly as the divine being she is. She avoids being objectified and oppressed at all costs. That’s why when Ketu entered Uttara Phalguni, the 4B movement hit. I actually predicted something like that would occur before Ketu entered this nakshatra because I KNEW what this nakshatra is all about.

The sutra of this nakshatra mentions a wish-fulfilling, fruit giving woman. This nakshatra is all about the continuation of traditions through lineages or societies. It is the process of marrying and extending the family or the process of joining in union with someone and extending sacred traditions (which is why Uttara Phalguni is associated with secret societies). This nakshatra deals with hypergamy and social climbing through generating one’s own success through their creative self-expression and fruits of wisdom that have been passed down to them from generations ago.

For these reasons, these natives are very focused on creating alliances with foreign nations (in order to strengthen their own). They are lovers of history (see Indiana Jones, played by an Uttara Phalguni native) who appreciate and preserve artifacts of the past. Magha is often renowned for its ability to channel the sacred power of the ancestors, but Aryaman (Uttara Phalguni) is the King of those ancestors.

This nakshatra is also associated with conquering the material world and anything that descends from the heavens onto Earth (so like, aliens taking over the world is a common theme in this nakshatra as well, which is why these natives are often casted as alien hunters). Christopher Columbus (unfortunately) had Uttara Phalguni moon.

Arjuna said he was Phalguna as he was born on a day where moon transited through the Phalguni nakshatras and he conquered some parts of the material world in which some parts he did it through marriage in order to create stronger alliances with each part of the world.

"proving" shifting through scientific evidence (& philosophic theory)

this post is heavily inspired by @voldyateme on tiktok. i saw her video and decided to do research on my own, and write a detailed post about this topic to make myself understand better. i also would like to mention that some of the claims irene made in her tiktok were wrong (and biased) i also wanted to clear some things up for myself.

fyi: long post ahead. this took me three days to understand and write. i might still be a bit unclear on my understanding of some aspects, but to avoid having to write a whole novel on the subject, i simplified my findings and shortened them by a lot.

-

john clauser is a physicist who won the nobel peace prize in 2022 for his work on quantum entanglement. his theory confirms that quantum particles can be entangled across vast distances, and that their behaviors are instantly connected, even if they're light years apart.

a very simplified example:

i: you create two entangled particles

ii: you send particle A to tokyo, and particle B to paris

iii: a person in tokyo measures particle A and sees it spinning up, then instantly, meaning instantly, faster than light, the person in paris will know particle B is spinning down

this is simply based on particle A or B's observation, w/o there having to be sent any message or signal between them. they behave as if they're one system - not two separate ones.

the moment you measure one particle, you're instantly aware of the other particle's state.

⭒ relating quantum entanglement to shifting:

okay so now we know that entangled particles act as of they're one system, even through long distances. so, if everything was once connected to the big bang, then on some level, everything may still be entangled. meaning you, your consciousness and other "versions" of yourself in other realities.

this could therefore suggest that we are already connected to all possible versions of ourselves. they exist within a quantum field of potential, and our awareness can shift between these versions by tuning into the version we desire - essentially by choosing a different frequency.

say you're listening to the radio. you know that you’re able to listen to any radio broadcast because there are thousands playing at the same exact time, but you choose which one to listen to, knowing you have the choice to change it to another.

it's the same exact with shifting. you know that there are endless versions of you in existence right this moment - you only have to choose to become aware of your desired self.

-

john wheeler, another physicist, proved that reality is directly linked to our consciousness and what we observe. it's been demonstrated that particles don't move until they're actually observed. so if we're not observing something, it doesn't have a definite state at all. this is called the "observer effect"

the effect has challenged and in some ways helped disprove einstein's theory of realism. einstein believed that that the physical world exists independently of whether we observe it or not.

example: according to einstein, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to observe it, the tree still falls. this is shown to be false on a quantum level. that said, we can't w/ certainty say that the tree does (or doesn’t) exist if no one is perceiving it (confusing, trust me, i know)

wheeler also proved that particles will change their makeup based on our choices and observation. simplified, this means that reality doesn't fully decide its state until it's observed. it can have different outcomes, and our choices affect the past behavior of particles.

⭒ relating the observer effect to shifting:

we know that quantum particles don't take on a definite form or "reality" until they're observed. this implies that our observation plays a direct role in shaping reality - not just by watching, but also deciding. this implies that reality isn't fixed, but fluid, shaped by our decisions, thoughts and observations and means we can "choose" our reality.

quantum physics shows that reality isn't fixed until observed, observation and consciousness do play a key role and that multiple outcomes are possible. so our consciousness focus can be said to be the mechanism that "shifts" us into a desired timeline or reality.

-

way before quantum physics existed, george berkley, a philosopher in the 1700s argued the idea "to be is to be perceived", which is eerily similar to what scientists are exploring today.

he believed that physical objects don't exist independently of our own perception. so if no one is for example perceiving a tree, then it doesn't exist.

berkeley said that there is no such thing as matter existing on its own w/o a mind to perceive it. BUT! there's a twist. you see, berkley also argued the existence of God being necessary to explain how the world works within his theory of perception and idealism.

okay so, to simplify because it can be really confusing:

i: physical things only exist if they're being perceived.

ii: when humans aren't perceiving things, God is.

iii: the reason why the world keeps existing even when we're not looking is because God is always "watching".

this raises the question: if we're not perceiving something, and the only reason it exists because God is, then how do we know it actually exists when we're not perceiving it?

berkeley responded:

"we know it exists because we can come back and perceive it again, and it behaves consistently"

if you look at a tree, walk away, come back. it's still there. berkeley argued that you assume the tree existed the whole time because when you go back, the tree would still be there, at the exact same spot.

this consistency would therefore be explained by God's continuous perception of it. so even though you didn't perceive it the whole time, the fact that reality is orderly and consistent is reliable "proof" that something (God) kept it there.

critics have argued back that assuming God is perceiving all the time isn't proof that He actually is, so how would we know that?

the answer is: w/o God, things would just pop in and out of existence every time we blink and that doesn't happen. so God is used to explain why the world is consistent and stable even when we're not watching.

you can't personally perceive something that you're not perceiving, but you trust that it's still there when you go back there, because of God.

berkeley's theory is still relevant today because the things he imagined in the 1700s do line up w/ scientific discoveries today and i resonate w/ his theory, so i just had to include it even though God’s existence isn’t proven. it’s fascinating, really.

⭒ relating george’s idealism to reality shifting:

if. like berkeley said, things only exist when they're being perceived, and if reality stays consistent because someone is always perceiving it, then that means perception isn't just passive, it's creative and shapes what exists.

this ties back to shifting beacuse it suggests that your desired reality doesn't need to "appear" in front of you for it to be real - it only needs to be perceived. if you consciously focus on your dr, perceiving it in your mind as real, then by berkeley's logic, it is real, maybe not in the physical sense just yet, but within the field of awareness that gives rise to reality in the first place.

so basically: if reality is perception based, and you're perceiving your dr, then you're giving form to something that exists because you're actively perceiving it, and you are capable of being in that place.