Silver inlaid brass candlestick holder, Iran, 13th-14th century
from The British Museum
The Egyptians almost never depicted illness. This instance is one of the exceptions. One of the man’s legs is withered and the foot only supports itself on the toes. It is the opinion of quite a number of doctors that these deformities are due to polio. This may be the world’s oldest representation of that disease.
New Kingdom, 18th Dynasty, ca. 1401-1363 BC. Now in the Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek. Copenhagen. ÆIN 134
Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Νεργκάλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989
Кузьма Мегаломматис, Нергал: мировая мифология, Греческая педагогическая энциклопедия, 1989
Kosmas Megalommatis, Nergal: Weltmythologie, Griechische Pädagogische Enzyklopädie, 1989
Kosmas Gözübüyükoğlu, Nergal: Dünya Mitolojisi, Yunan Pedagoji Ansiklopedisi, 1989
قزمان ميغالوماتيس، نرگال : اساطیر جهانی، دایره المعارف آموزشی یونانی، 1989
Côme Megalommatis, Nergal: Mythologie mondiale, Encyclopédie pédagogique grecque, 1989
1989 قزمان ميغالوماتيس، نرغال : الأساطير العالمية، الموسوعة التربوية اليونانية،
Cosimo Megalommatis, Nergal (o Nerigal): mitologia mondiale, Enciclopedia pedagogica greca, 1989
Cosimo Megalommatis, Nergal: mitología mundial, Enciclopedia pedagógica griega, 1989
Cosmas Megalommatis, Nergal: World Mythology, Greek Pedagogical Encyclopedia, 1989
--------------------
Скачать PDF-файл: / PDF-Datei herunterladen: / Télécharger le fichier PDF : / PDF dosyasını indirin: / :PDF قم بتنزيل ملف / Download PDF file: / : یک فایل دانلود کنید / Κατεβάστε το PDF:
Ashurbanipal: the Coming King - Part II
In this 2-series article (published back in 1987), I present a brief diagram of the Messianic Assyrian dynasty of the Sargonids (722-609 BCE), who ruled Nineveh as the exemplary universal empire of the World History; accepting Jonah's preaching, Sargon of Assyria (722-705 BCE) and his son and grandson, Sennacherib (705-681 BCE) and Esarhaddon (681-670 BCE), ushered the world to the Messianic Era of Ashurbanipal (669-625 BCE), who lived a first life as the Suffering Messiah, on the basis of contemporaneous historical texts and personal declarations, only to leave to posterity the claim to his exulted return and celestial reign. All posterior adaptations and identifications being fraudulent, the Second Coming of Ashurbanipal is instantly corroborated by the nature of his magnum opus. The two titles of the series are: "Ashurbanipal: the Righteous Suffering" and "Ashurbanipal: the Coming King".
Ашурбанипал: грядущий царь - Часть ΙI
В этой 2-серийной статье (опубликованной еще в 1987 г.) я представляю краткую схему мессианской ассирийской династии Саргонидов (722-609 гг. до н. э.), правивших Ниневией как образцовой универсальной империей Всемирной истории; приняв проповедь Ионы, Саргон Ассирийский (722-705 гг. до н.э.) и его сын и внук Сеннахирим (705-681 гг. до н.э.) и Асархаддон (681-670 гг. до н.э.), открыли миру мессианскую эру Ашшурбанипала (669–625 гг. до н. э.), который прожил первую жизнь как Страдающий Мессия, на основании современных ему исторических текстов и личных заявлений, только для того, чтобы оставить потомкам притязания на его ликующее возвращение и небесное правление. Все последующие адаптации и отождествления являются мошенническими, и Второе пришествие Ашшурбанипала немедленно подтверждается характером его великого произведения. Два названия сериала: «Ашурбанипал: Праведный Страдающий » и «Ашурбанипал: грядущий царь».
Ασσουρμπανιπάλ Ερχόμενος – Τμήμα Β'
Σε αυτή την σειρά δύο άρθρων (δημοσιευμένων το 1987), παρουσιάζω ένα σύντομο διάγραμμα της Μεσσιανικής Ασσυριακής δυναστείας των Σαργονιδών (722-609 πτεμ), οι οποίοι κυβέρνησαν τη Νινευή ως την υποδειγματική παγκόσμια αυτοκρατορία της Παγκόσμιας Ιστορίας. Αποδεχόμενοι το κήρυγμα του Ιωνά, ο Σαργών της Ασσυρίας (722-705 π.Χ.), καθώς και ο υιός και εγγονός του, Σεναχειρίμπ (705-681 πτεμ) και Ασσαρχαδδών (681-670 πτεμ), οδήγησαν τον κόσμο στη Μεσσιανική Εποχή του Ασουρμπανιπάλ (669-625 πτεμ), ο οποίος έζησε μια πρώτη ζωή ως ο Πάσχων Μεσσίας, με βάση τα σύγχρονα τότε ιστορικά κείμενα και τις προσωπικές του διακηρύξεις, μόνο για να αφήσει σε όλους τους επόμενους την αξίωση για την εξυμνηθείσα επιστροφή του και την ουράνια βασιλεία του. Καθώς όλες οι μεταγενέστερες προσαρμογές του θέματος και ταυτίσεις προσώπων είναι ολότελα δόλιες, η Δευτέρα Παρουσία του Ασουρμπανιπάλ επιβεβαιώνεται ακαριαία από τη φύση του μεγάλου έργου του. Οι δύο τίτλοι της σειράς είναι: «Ασσουρμπανιπάλ Πάσχων» και «Ασσουρμπανιπάλ Ερχόμενος».
-------------------------------
Main units:
Introduction
The flight of the Assyrians and of the ten tribes of Israel
The exile and the return
Ashurbanipal as the Coming King
Ashurbanipal - the Righteous Suffering
Appendices:
Assyria and Nomads
Assyrians, Medes and Urartu
in: Inexplicable, February 1987, pp. 44-54
----------------------
Основные главы:
Введение
Бегство ассирийцев и десяти колен Израилевых
Изгнание и возвращение
Ашшурбанипал как грядущий царь
Ашшурбанипал – Праведный Страдающий
Приложения:
Ассирия и кочевники
Ассирийцы, Мидийцы и Урарту
в: Необъяснимое, февраль 1987 г., стр. 44-54
--------------------------
Κυρίως ενότητες:
Εισαγωγή
Η φυγή των Ασσυρίων και των δέκα φυλών του Ισραήλ
Η μετοικεσία και η επιστροφή
Ο Ασσουρμπανιπάλ ως Ερχόμενος
Ο Ασσουρμπανιπάλ-Πάσχων
Παραρτήματα:
Ασσυρία και Νομάδες
Ασσύριοι, Μήδοι και Ουραρτού
στο Ανεξήγητο, Φεβρουάριος 1987, σ. 44-54
--------------------
Κατεβάστε το άρθρο: / Download the article: / Скачать статью:
Model of a Multi-Storied Tower, Chinese, 1st century. Earthenware with unfired pigments.
Courtesy Alain Truong
Her insan kendi nasibine gayrettir bu yaşamda. ve her şey yalnızca kadere yazıldığı gibi yaşanır insanın fıtratında..
The Historian, Elizabeth Kostova
The blue tiled entrance facade of the Mausoleum of Shirin Bika Aga, Timur’s sister, located in Shah-i-Zinda necropolis in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. 1385-86 CE
The Hittites can be said to have an overwhelming amount of mention in historical sources compared to other civilisations that were discovered in the 19th century so why were they considered a fictive people until the 20th century? In my humble opinion I put the blame for this squarely on the British. The British while greatly helping historical understanding through stealing everyones stuff have also had a constant infection of "gentlemen scholars" which had the main goal of beating their personal rivals within their fields. This may be what happened with the Hittites.
Lets lay the groundwork: What proof did we have before the year 1900 that the Hittites existed?
Over 60 mentions in the Old Testament
The discovery of their capital of Hattusa in 1834 that is identified later in 1886
The discovery of the Tel-el-amarna letters that have communication between the Hittites and Egypt.
The Kadesh inscriptions
The Ramesseum
The three seperate inscriptions of the Hittite-egypt peace treaty. The Egyptian one being by one of the most investigated areas of Egypt the temple complex of Luxor. Another inscription in Akkadian and a third in Hittite (classical neo-hittite was however not readable at this time).
What proof did we have that they did not exist:
The consensus of mostly British "orientalists", egyptologists and archeologists. Their reason being... that they had discredited all the mounting evidence so far and were very stubborn as to not give credit to their rivals. They were convinced they were right simply because they viewed themselves as superior historians and that their rivals that were supporting the evidence were wrong and inferior. This is the problem with the wealthy class of “gentlemen scholars” who typically have an ego larger than the Achaemenid empire.
Now is it known for sure that the contemporary British experts of the early 1900s contempt for one another was the reason for the slow discovery of the Hittites? Of course not, not entirely, Hittitotology is a quite young field of study some blame can be put on that aswell as the lack of interest in the topic but even so there is quite a lot of proof of the rift that this topic created among these experts and they were very reluctant to give any credit whatsoever to profound discoveries during the 19th century. It was most likely an example of confirmation bias, the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories, they discarded evidence for the Hittites for another unknown other unidentified civilisation simply because they had already preached the Hittites non-existance for years and did not want to contradict themselves.
Here's some proof though! (I would cite the source that compiled these but they should be boycotted for closely supporting genocide so they get no mention)
In 1909, Egyptologist Dr. Melvin Kyle recalled in The Hittite Vindication an earlier conversation with an esteemed colleague, writing: “In 1904, one of the foremost archaeologists of Europe said to me: ‘I do not believe there ever were such people as the Hittites ….’” (It seems likely this individual was Sir Ernest Alfred Thomson Wallis Budge, the famous Egyptologist.)
Archaeologist John Garstang wrote in 1929 that “25 years ago [1904] some of the foremost orientalists did not believe in the existence of a Hittite nation” (The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia).
Evolutionary geologist George Frederick Wright noted how the Hittites were used not only as an example of an error in the Bible but also as proofof the general falsity of the book itself. He wrote, “[T]he numerous references in the Bible to this mysterious people were unconfirmed by any other historical authorities, so that many regarded the biblical statements as mythical and an indication of the general untrustworthiness of biblical history” (“The Testimony of the Monuments to the Truth of the Scriptures,” 1910; emphasis added throughout).
Anyway enough about my personal beef with dead British archeologists this will be a recurring topic on this blog.
Pair of Deity Earrings with Vishnu on Garuda (front) and chepu (monster mask) (back), Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, 1600s or 1700s. Cleveland Museum of Art (ID: 1915.338). A green Vishnu with four arms, each holding his attributes of discus (his upper right hand), mace (upper left), lotus (lower right), and conch (in pearl, lower left) rides on a coral Garuda with lapis wings, arms outstretched. The blue figures on either side are probably celestial beings praising him in dance postures, with one leg crossed over the other. On the back sides, delicate filigree floral scrolls form the backdrop of a protective mask popular in the Nepal; a sun over a crescent moon are inlaid above his head. (Cleveland Museum of Art)
How would one say "absolute destiny apocalypse' in Sumerian?
This is a bit of a tricky one, for reasons I'll get into below.
For "apocalypse" (a term derived from Greek and closely associated with Abrahamic faiths) there isn't a great equivalent in Sumerian, so I'd use ninghalamma 𒃻𒄩𒇴𒈠 "annihilation, disaster". "Destiny, fate" is nam 𒉆, and for "absolute" I'd use kilib 𒆸𒆸 "totality, the entirety (of)".
But putting these together in a phrase requires some structural elements we're missing in "absolute destiny apocalypse". English allows us to string nouns together like this by just saying them in a row, but doing so in Sumerian (kilib nam ninghalamma) would end up meaning something like "the entirety and the destiny and the apocalypse", almost certainly not what you mean. I'd prefer to create a phrase like kilibninghalammanamaka "the entirety of the annihilation of destiny", written 𒆸𒆸𒃻𒄩𒇴𒈠𒉆𒈠𒅗 in cuneiform, but I'm not sure if that's exactly the meaning you're going for.
Thanks for your question, and feel free to reblog and let me know if there's a more precise phrase you'd like me to put together!