"Jason isn't right he's just traumatized."
Bruce's entire story is about his trauma. His no killing rule is about trauma. He is traumatized and it's why he does what he does.
Also, I know this is shocking, but victims and people with ptsd can let that influence our ethics without it making them invalid. What kind of "the most calm and objective person in the argument is right" gross dudebro debate tactic is this?
Like some of you are so eager to prove that fictional killing is wrong you end up saying wildly offensive shit about people with ptsd.