A Male Could Write An Entire Manifesto Titled "I Am A Rapist. I Am A Rapist Who Rapes Women" And He Would

sorry for shooting your dog with a crossbow you have to understand Im american our education system is in the gutter most of us were never taught that killing peoples beloved pets with medieval projectile weaponry is wrong and we're all too burnt out to research it on our own time

Parental love is the most conditional love I've ever seen. Remember these are the people that brought you into this miserable world, while making you suffer throughout, all the while not even liking each other. They DO NOT love you, trust me.

Women will practice and uphold patriarchal beauty standards they personally conform to. It’s all fun and games when you’re the preferred fetish. Body types, hair colors and textures, lip size, skin tones, etc are all ways in which women are ranked. Egos are bruised when different models go in and out of style. Not because those women want to forgo such ideals altogether, but because they’re unable to embody the latest trend. Let thee without a makeup brush make the first accusation of brainwashing.

A “feminist” former model turned influencer, has dedicated her retirement to preaching about the beauty industry. Writing paragraphs about how her efforts to get dolled up resulted in no dating offers, because men were interested in younger women. This then propelled her into calling out unrealistic beauty standards. The same standards she enjoyed gleefully in youth. Citing she misses “turning heads” and ignoring the hypocrisy of her first marriage to a much older man. Her ultimate goal being a societal shift into including older women into the category of “sexy.”

Women with faces full of filler and glue adhesive on their eyelids will claim it’s ridiculous to rate women based on body shapes. Women who buy undergarments with the purpose of pushing their breast together have something to say about butts being the new thing. Women who sell out Sephoras in college complain about the pressure of maintaining youth with each passing birthday. The body positivity movement is filled with cognitive dissonance. “This standard is bad! Wait, what do you mean my hair dye and eyeliner are included in that? It’s not that deep and I do it for myself anyway.”

When women are “winning” the patriarchal game of penises and empty promises, they will do anything to maintain their status. Social capital is kept through presenting yourself as sexually available to heterosexual males. That is the foundation on which all beauty standards are built upon, regardless of what women tell themselves. Competitiveness is the sole purpose behind women’s picking and choosing of which aesthetic preference’s should be maintained. Remember, women are hierarchical too, and heterosexual world dominance is perpetuated through pecking order.

I’ll take claims of unfair beauty standards seriously when I see women rejecting ALL of them in mass. Until then, the same women shaving off their body hair can keep begging the pedo’s they’re appealing to for less judgment on their ass size/shape. Every woman wants to be the exception, the one who accepts patriarchy’s “prizes,” but escapes its eventual expiration date. There’s no having it both ways. Men cannot be both your oppressors and saviors. Perform and play dress up for the penis, then graciously bow and exit the stage when it demands the next act.

SAHMs and working women are not on the same team. If SAHMs receive government welfare, it is working women in male-dominated fields that will get the shortest end of the stick. Career-oriented women who do their own chores already have to compete in the workplace with men that get pampered by their wives. On top of that their income tax will end up paying for something that works against their favor. It’s very telling who the pro SAHM welfare ‘feminists’ on this app want to sacrifice for their cause. 

Having a baby is literally psycho like you’ve entirely lost your mind get help

Is there a source for the claim that she was aware of her husband's compulsion, taking upskirt pictures and such and him abusing their children? What she experienced was so degrading and evil, and I have respect for her strength in going public with it. Yet, if it’s true that she looked the other way while her husband harmed other women before, I wonder: what if she hadn’t been the one to suffer those rapes for 10 years, but another woman? and her husband was one of the 50 men to rape that woman?

20 Minutes

Dominique Pelicot face à cinq autres affaires de viols ou de meurtre

La police judiciaire enquête sur cinq affaires non élucidées entre 1994 et 2004 où la piste de Dominique Pelicot est envisagée

This article is in French but it says that "in 2010, the year he moved to Mazan with his wife Gisèle, Dominique Pelicot had already had a run-in with the police, as revealed by Midi Libre. Aged 57, he was arrested in July in a shopping centre in Seine-et-Marne, caught filming under the skirts of customers with a miniature camera hidden in a pen."

I know this is a Twitter thread, but this is from a journalist who documented nearly all that was said during the trial in October.

In this series of tweets we're made aware Dominique Pélicot's son thought there were very few boundaries between him and his parents, and it's been reported Dominique and Gisèle had sex in their front of their children several times.

Other family members (including grandkids and Gisèle's own daughter) said he masturbated in public sometimes but she looked the other way.

Unpopular opinion, s*x is gross and people should stop engaging in such patriarchal behavior

I irk at the name of feminism when I hear it from anybody. It has totally lost its menaing and means nothing anymore.

Now they are doing the same with radical feminism. Raddies with boyfriends are main center of feminism. They wanna endlessly analyse male nature only to end up breeding with them and spawning new males. This makes sense why black pilled women don't wanna associate with radfems anymore.

Reformist women and hetfems have started to colonise radfem spaces and diluting the actual meaning. You get to see women who believe in socialisation theory and giving out "harm reduction" tips. If they really wanted safety for the woman then they would have asked her to abandon their moid.

There's too many handmaidens. I mean there is a reason why we have talks here that ask to center mothers and how bEauTifUl motherhood is.

What was the last straw on the back of the camel was the apparent lesbophobia from these same women.

From "radblr hates straight women" to "lesbians shouldn't talk about separatism". When lesbians already face double (or even triple) oppression. They think lesbians are having "sex parties" and how unfair it is for straight women to not "enjoy" intimacy. Lol. Let's assume all homophobia from world is eliminated and even then our dating pool is so small. We have to be single for years.

Honestly, I'm starting to doubt that radical feminism was even "colonized" by male lovers. Seems to me that the majority of the big radfems love males anyway. (Any truly liberated women that feel that it's their movement, and they feel betrayed by this, I get that as well.) But feminism as a whole is very difficult to truly shape into a revolutionary movement because it requires the hatred or the very least the absence of love for males, but with 99% of women truly loving them until their dying breath, we cannot move in any meaningful way.

how can you say that while putting make up on 😭

Really fucked with me learning that when Michel Foucault first arrived at UC Berkeley his friends tried to warn him not to participate in the local gay bathhouse scene due to the risk of AIDS, but that he did it anyway because he thought that AIDS was just a social construct. And when he inevitably got infected with AIDS as a result of unprotected sex he refused treatment insisting it was a pulmonary infection, and he didn't get diagnosed until his symptoms were so bad that he was forcibly hospitalised.

"AIDS is just a social construct" sounds like the sort of thing you would make up as a parody of the sort of stupid shit a post-modernist would believe. But the most famous post-modernist in history believed it, and ended up dying as a result of that belief. And given how respected he was, other men probably also died as a result of believing what he was saying. I get that they didn't know as much about AIDS in 1983 as we do today, but it been around for a few years already, so one of the supposedly smartest men on the planet should have had enough evidence to be able to overturn the hypothesis that viruses are just social constructs.