It's easy to be a naive idealist. It's easy to be a cynical realist. It's quite another thing to have no illusions and still hold the inner flame.
Marie-Louise von Franz
You're not a dumbass if you like gossip and drama. Men created this myth so that women don't form friendships with each other, they called them stupid for talking to each other. Because if you can't gossip you won't tell your friends about how your husband treats you.
Being interested in people and social things and drama and arguments and all these things comes free with being a social species. Enjoy them all you want, it's neither stupid nor immoral.
THE SYSTEM PICKS THOSE WHO ARE NO THREAT TO IT
For the love of fucking god, stop interacting with scrote trolls. Report every single one of these pointless, discord sowing Tumblr soldiers for spam, and then block them without a single word.
Do not give these vectors of degeneracy a molecule of attention or regard— they’re like Rumplestiltskin trying to upset and deceive you.
Let’s practice some quantum digital minimalism. When you block the Tumblr chuds, they cease to exist. It’s that simple.
Most men are chronically bored, petulant little boys trapped in a cursed, sub-tier, morally & intellectually defunct dimension of mind. Little to no hope for them. Let THEM worry about that, and let US move on.
Be cold + icy + indifferent to all male bad actors. Grey rock them. You are not changing his one track mind with your essay <3
“Not every person has the right to be a parent” is a sentiment I feel is widely accepted in leftist circles, referring largely to abusive households. But this doesn’t get taken to condemn surrogacy and egg-donating industries. Like Jesus Christ why do most leftists not care about this flavor of stuff when it financially exploits women, and subjects them to unnecessary harm? All just because it means infertile women and homosexual couples can have a different way to have children to raise? What happened to “having children isn’t a guaranteed right” Of course I know it’s because of misogyny, but good grief.
Women who protect dangerous men are almost as dangerous as the men they protect. There are women who know their husbands/brothers/fathers have committed sex crimes against women, and stay silent in the presence of other women. They don’t warn other women of their male relatives’ predatory behavior, allowing their pervy male relatives to get close to women who don’t know any better.
So tired of seeing feminists claim maIe identified women just need to "learn". You put any woman in a position where they have to face maIeness in its rawest form without other women to take the heat away from them and they'll spit out takes (or actions even) like what's in radical feminist texts. Not in a "omg I've just found this out" way but more like something they've held in them all along. As women harm other women they're fully aware of their actions as they do it. These women aren't unaware they just dont care (until it hits home for them).
I will never forget when I read a revolutionary, pioneering, piece of academic literature on feminist ethics by a truly inspirational feminist academic who is still active to this day, whose conclusion was that most women are too fucking stupid and dick-obssessed to even desire liberation from men, let alone to actually achieve it. I have never seen an academic veer from science and empirical evidence like that. The fact that she did it is a testament to how inferior and hopeless most women really are.