Itsmymochichim - Untitled

"proving" shifting through scientific evidence (& philosophic theory)

this post is heavily inspired by @voldyateme on tiktok. i saw her video and decided to do research on my own, and write a detailed post about this topic to make myself understand better. i also would like to mention that some of the claims irene made in her tiktok were wrong (and biased) i also wanted to clear some things up for myself.

fyi: long post ahead. this took me three days to understand and write. i might still be a bit unclear on my understanding of some aspects, but to avoid having to write a whole novel on the subject, i simplified my findings and shortened them by a lot.

-

john clauser is a physicist who won the nobel peace prize in 2022 for his work on quantum entanglement. his theory confirms that quantum particles can be entangled across vast distances, and that their behaviors are instantly connected, even if they're light years apart.

a very simplified example:

i: you create two entangled particles

ii: you send particle A to tokyo, and particle B to paris

iii: a person in tokyo measures particle A and sees it spinning up, then instantly, meaning instantly, faster than light, the person in paris will know particle B is spinning down

this is simply based on particle A or B's observation, w/o there having to be sent any message or signal between them. they behave as if they're one system - not two separate ones.

the moment you measure one particle, you're instantly aware of the other particle's state.

⭒ relating quantum entanglement to shifting:

okay so now we know that entangled particles act as of they're one system, even through long distances. so, if everything was once connected to the big bang, then on some level, everything may still be entangled. meaning you, your consciousness and other "versions" of yourself in other realities.

this could therefore suggest that we are already connected to all possible versions of ourselves. they exist within a quantum field of potential, and our awareness can shift between these versions by tuning into the version we desire - essentially by choosing a different frequency.

say you're listening to the radio. you know that you’re able to listen to any radio broadcast because there are thousands playing at the same exact time, but you choose which one to listen to, knowing you have the choice to change it to another.

it's the same exact with shifting. you know that there are endless versions of you in existence right this moment - you only have to choose to become aware of your desired self.

-

john wheeler, another physicist, proved that reality is directly linked to our consciousness and what we observe. it's been demonstrated that particles don't move until they're actually observed. so if we're not observing something, it doesn't have a definite state at all. this is called the "observer effect"

the effect has challenged and in some ways helped disprove einstein's theory of realism. einstein believed that that the physical world exists independently of whether we observe it or not.

example: according to einstein, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to observe it, the tree still falls. this is shown to be false on a quantum level. that said, we can't w/ certainty say that the tree does (or doesn’t) exist if no one is perceiving it (confusing, trust me, i know)

wheeler also proved that particles will change their makeup based on our choices and observation. simplified, this means that reality doesn't fully decide its state until it's observed. it can have different outcomes, and our choices affect the past behavior of particles.

⭒ relating the observer effect to shifting:

we know that quantum particles don't take on a definite form or "reality" until they're observed. this implies that our observation plays a direct role in shaping reality - not just by watching, but also deciding. this implies that reality isn't fixed, but fluid, shaped by our decisions, thoughts and observations and means we can "choose" our reality.

quantum physics shows that reality isn't fixed until observed, observation and consciousness do play a key role and that multiple outcomes are possible. so our consciousness focus can be said to be the mechanism that "shifts" us into a desired timeline or reality.

-

way before quantum physics existed, george berkley, a philosopher in the 1700s argued the idea "to be is to be perceived", which is eerily similar to what scientists are exploring today.

he believed that physical objects don't exist independently of our own perception. so if no one is for example perceiving a tree, then it doesn't exist.

berkeley said that there is no such thing as matter existing on its own w/o a mind to perceive it. BUT! there's a twist. you see, berkley also argued the existence of God being necessary to explain how the world works within his theory of perception and idealism.

okay so, to simplify because it can be really confusing:

i: physical things only exist if they're being perceived.

ii: when humans aren't perceiving things, God is.

iii: the reason why the world keeps existing even when we're not looking is because God is always "watching".

this raises the question: if we're not perceiving something, and the only reason it exists because God is, then how do we know it actually exists when we're not perceiving it?

berkeley responded:

"we know it exists because we can come back and perceive it again, and it behaves consistently"

if you look at a tree, walk away, come back. it's still there. berkeley argued that you assume the tree existed the whole time because when you go back, the tree would still be there, at the exact same spot.

this consistency would therefore be explained by God's continuous perception of it. so even though you didn't perceive it the whole time, the fact that reality is orderly and consistent is reliable "proof" that something (God) kept it there.

critics have argued back that assuming God is perceiving all the time isn't proof that He actually is, so how would we know that?

the answer is: w/o God, things would just pop in and out of existence every time we blink and that doesn't happen. so God is used to explain why the world is consistent and stable even when we're not watching.

you can't personally perceive something that you're not perceiving, but you trust that it's still there when you go back there, because of God.

berkeley's theory is still relevant today because the things he imagined in the 1700s do line up w/ scientific discoveries today and i resonate w/ his theory, so i just had to include it even though God’s existence isn’t proven. it’s fascinating, really.

⭒ relating george’s idealism to reality shifting:

if. like berkeley said, things only exist when they're being perceived, and if reality stays consistent because someone is always perceiving it, then that means perception isn't just passive, it's creative and shapes what exists.

this ties back to shifting beacuse it suggests that your desired reality doesn't need to "appear" in front of you for it to be real - it only needs to be perceived. if you consciously focus on your dr, perceiving it in your mind as real, then by berkeley's logic, it is real, maybe not in the physical sense just yet, but within the field of awareness that gives rise to reality in the first place.

so basically: if reality is perception based, and you're perceiving your dr, then you're giving form to something that exists because you're actively perceiving it, and you are capable of being in that place.

Uttara Phalguni & Dhanishta women are so similar to me. Interesting because the Vasus (Dhanishta’s deities) stole Kamadhenu (Uttara Phalguni). By the way, Uttara Phalguni is typically associated with Nandi, but I saw the strong connection between the wish-fulfilling cow & the wish-fulfilling woman mentioned in Uttara Phalguni’s sutra. Then I noticed someone else saw the connection between Uttara Phalguni & Kamadhenu (shreemastrology on Twitter).

The same way Claire Nakti mentioned how there is always a Dhanishta woman for each generation who is a sex symbol (I really hope she doesn’t take that video down but I think it’s still up so go watch if you haven’t!!), I’ve noticed the same for Uttara Phalguni. One of the women she mentioned actually had an Uttara Phalguni placement as well (Sophia Loren)

There was Sophia Loren, Olivia Newton John, Britney Spears, Nicki Minaj, and now Doja Cat.

These women are naturally different in their own expression of this trope, but considering how Uttara Phalguni is the center stage & the objectified female form, it makes complete sense why these women rise to the spotlight continuously. They eventually become “cash cows” because sex sells, and Uttara Phalguni is the feminine expression of sexuality (hence its associated with the sex organs, lips, left hand, the blossoming of a flower. Lips & flowers are symbolic of the Yoni. It’s also why this nakshatra is the awakening of Shakti. It’s just that society has distorted and tainted how natural and beautiful the awakening of Shakti is.)

Aryaman also rules the traditions of a group of people. This might extend into the traditions of a society which produces (Uttara Phalguni is all about producing fruit + being wish-fulfilling) media that makes $. In other words: pop culture. This nakshatra is the idea of capitalism & industries within itself. And what runs industries at the end of the day? The idea that sex sells. The same way people exploit the female form is the same way humans exploit the Earth, as women are vessels of Mother Nature ♍️

Laura Mulvey coined the term “Male Gaze.” Not only did she have Ashlesha sun with potential Krittika moon, but Uttara Phalguni Venus (DK) conjunct Uttara Phalguni Rahu.

they're mad at her for this. oh my god

Led Zeppelin album as eye-shadow palette

How I always induce the void state + what you’re doing wrong.

i’ve induced the void state at least 7 times from what i remember, yes i manifested my dream life, you might wonder why i’m on tumblr yapping my brain out about what manifesting is and whatever it’s because im here to try to help some of you, i want you to be successful just like me. so try to understand this post.

the way i successfully induce the void is by just deciding that i do, and since that assumption hardened into fact already it just basically means for me i can always induce it when i want and where i want. you can literally become just like me and all it takes is a simple decision and a flip in thoughts, whoever said it takes some serious repetition to get into the void is wrong imo, but thats okay! because we all have different assumptions and beliefs and that’s totally normal, the world won’t end because you think it takes months to finally induce a state that you’re always in.

now here’s what you’re doing wrong, you’re wavering, you’re contradicting yourself, you aren’t trusting yourself, you’re panicking, you’re rushing, you’re in “waiting” mode, you’re seeing the void state as something it isn’t, you think its the key, you’re dependent on it, you’re overthinking it and probably other things but those were just the stuff i could probably assume about you. stop doing all of those things i listed because i promise you inducing the void state is literally the easiest thing you can do. “well why haven’t i induced it yet?” because you keep assuming you cant. “well i don’t assume that i can’t i just can never induce it” well you just said you couldn’t what are you talking about? remember whatever you say is true so you saying you aren’t inducing the void no matter what is true. please read @salemlunaa ‘s post about reaffirming failure. because that is what majority of you are doing.

stop falling back into your old cycle the old story is dead it does NOT serve you anymore. make that decision you’re a “void state master” and literally watch how your reality changes, just be a void state master in imagination because again imagination creates, stay firm to your new story or assumption and don’t think against it. you have always been a void state master. you just need to bring your awareness to that fact.

The thing is the girls and women who identify as non-binary while gender non conforming have the potential to be so fucking cool. I know them, they’re like me, at core they’re like all of us who refuse to give in that bullshit idea that there’s a feminine essence to womanhood. Said like that they would agree, but since gender activism disguises its rancid sexist views in postmodernist language they don’t see it for what it is. So many only allowed themselves to look more masculine and have an alternative style once they decided they were not women, as if women couldn’t look androgynous, couldn’t wear black all day, couldn’t have the finest punk jacket or simply couldn’t cut their hair short, couldn’t be make-up free, couldn’t be hairy and wear baggy shirts and jeans.

They can look just like us who are gnc and radical feminists, except they believe they’re giving a big fat middle finger to the system when the reality is they have the same idea as the system : women must be feminine, men must be masculine. Again, said like that they would disagree, but their beliefs show otherwise. I want to shake them by the shoulders and ask them “why the fuck are you calling yourself basically non-woman the minute you look different from the heteronormative patriarchal norm (gender) ?” They have the potential to be so cool, yet the minute they say that they’re not women this goes down the drain and there’s no spirit of rebellion, anti-system, anti status-quo left. It’s counter intuitive, counter productive, and most importantly it lets down all girls and women who never fitted gender norms and never will. I can look like a post-punk dude while being a masc woman, fuck your sexist expectations, fuck your little boxes, that’s gender abolition.

OKAYYYYY HELLOOOO YOU SHIFTED??!?? PACK IT UP MASTER SHIFTER 😩🫶🏽

BAE WHAT WAS THE METHOD PLEASE THESE ALMOST SHIFTS AND SHIFTING FOR TWO SECONDS ARE EATING ME ALIVE HELP A BISH OUTTTT

the anti-method (a.k.a., you were never here to begin with).

౨ৎ this isn’t a method (well, sorta). no steps, no trying, no reaching. it’s a glitch. a realisation. a quiet little crack in the mirror. it did make *me* shift !!!

there was never a door to open. never a distance to cross. you were never locked out. just lost in a dream, trying to wake up when you were already awake.

people talk about shifting like it’s a journey, a climb, a thing to chase. but what if it was always just a memory?? something lodged in the back of your mind, waiting for you to remember it? like a word on the tip of your tongue. like déjà vu.

you were already there. you just forgot.

i , lie or sit still. don’t try. don’t force. just let yourself exist, soft and untethered. feel your body like it’s not yours. just a borrowed costume, a dress-up game you forgot you were playing. limbs are foreign. the weight is someone else’s problem.

ii , ask yourself. " WHAT IF I ALREADY SHIFTED AND I JUST...FORGOT? " not “what if i go there,” not “what if i shift.” but what if i was always there? what if i just... blanked out for a sec?

iii , your brain will (probably) panic. it’ll start grasping at straws, trying to prove you’re still here. trying to reattach you to the illusion. let it fumble. let it glitch. just keep thinking :

◞ i already shifted. i just forgot. ◞ i’ve been there this whole time.

it’s not a theory. not a wish. just a fact you misplaced somewhere along the way.

iv , the mind collapses on itself. how do you know you aren’t already in your dr? how do you prove this isn’t the dream? the body stops feeling like yours. the world gets flimsy at the edges. and then? the illusion shatters.

v , you remember. not enter. not “get there.” just....remember. your dr? you were in it before you even asked. shifting? you never had to try. it was always just a breath away. you were never locked out. you just forgot the door was already open.

vi , you're there. like the ending of a lucid dream where you suddenly know without needing proof. and that’s it. you're there. you always were.

　　　　　　　　　　  ⊹　 ︶︶　 ୨୧　 ︶︶　 ⊹

the anti-method works for getting into the void as well, as it bypasses the idea of getting there entirely. instead of treating the void as a destination you have to reach, it flips the perspective :

you’re already in the void. you just forgot.

the void isn’t something you enter. it’s something you remember. it’s the default state, the space beneath everything else. but your mind, in its little desperate need to cling to reality, convinced you that you’re somewhere else. that you’re here instead of there. this method forces your brain into a logical spiral . . .

◞ how do i know i’m not already in the void? ◞ how do i prove this isn’t the dream? ◞ what if i just… forgot?

and because your brain can’t disprove it, the illusion starts to crack. your body stops feeling real. the world starts to feel dreamlike. the physical self detaches, and, poof, there you are. or rather, there you always were.

it works because it messes with the fabric of perception. if you stop believing in the difference between “here” and “there,” what’s left???? just being. just existing. and in that moment of realisation, the illusion of reality collapses. and you remember the void like an old childhood memory suddenly rushing back.

once you're in the void, once the realisation fully sinks in and the illusion crumbles, you're just there. infinite. detached. pure awareness. it’s like waking up from a dream, but instead of waking into your bedroom, you wake into nothingness. and then? well, you decide.

◞ if you want to affirm, affirm. ◞ if you want to shift, set your intention and let yourself go. ◞ if you want to just exist in the void, soak in the weightless, limitless nothingness.

there’s no next step because the void doesn’t require doing. it’s the ultimate being. you can shape it, or you can let it hold you. either way, you’re already exactly where you need to be.

what happens after? whatever you want. that’s the whole point.

౨ৎ and that is it. no trying, no reaching, just a little oh. moment. a déjà vu in the back of your mind. go play in the dreamscape. you were never here anyway.

you definitely don't require this method, or any method at all to either shift *or* get to the void, but method can be fun ! you can definitely try this one out if you wish.

𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓨𝓸𝓷𝓲 𝓐𝓷𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓼 & 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓘𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓽𝓼

𝓐𝓼𝓱𝔀𝓲𝓷𝓲, 𝓢𝓱𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐎

ɪɴᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰʀᴇᴇᴅᴏᴍ ɪꜱ ʜɪɢʜʟʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜɪɴ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʟɪꜰᴇ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴛɪᴇᴅ ᴅᴏᴡɴ ᴛᴏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍɪᴛᴍᴇɴᴛ-ᴘʜᴏʙᴇꜱ. ᴍɪꜱᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴄᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʟᴏᴡ ᴀᴛ ᴘʀᴏᴄᴇꜱꜱɪɴɢ ɪɴꜰᴏʀᴍᴀᴛɪᴏɴ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴇᴀɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛᴀʟʟ ʙᴜɪʟᴅꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʟᴏɴɢ ᴛʜɪᴄᴋ ʜᴀɪʀ. ᴍᴀᴊᴇꜱᴛɪᴄ ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛʏ. ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀʟᴋ, ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜰᴏᴏᴛꜱᴛᴇᴘꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴜꜱᴜᴀʟʟʏ ʜᴇᴀʀᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜱᴇᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ʀɪᴅɪɴɢ ᴘᴏꜱɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ (ᴍᴀʏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴏᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʜɪᴘꜱ ɪꜰʏᴡɪᴍ). ꜱᴇx ɪꜱ ʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ꜰᴀꜱᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ɪꜱ ᴜꜱᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ Qᴜɪᴄᴋʟʏ, ɴᴏᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ʟᴏᴛ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴛᴀᴍɪɴᴀ.

𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓲, 𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓽𝓲 🐘

ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴘɪʀɪᴛᴜᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅɪꜱᴘʟᴀʏꜱ ᴀ Qᴜɪᴇᴛ ꜱᴛʀᴇɴɢᴛʜ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ʟᴏᴜᴅ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴄᴀɴ ᴅɪꜱᴛᴜʀʙ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴇᴀᴄᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʀᴇꜱᴘᴇᴄᴛ ʜᴜᴍɪʟɪᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴏɴᴇꜱᴛʏ. ᴀᴍᴀᴢɪɴɢ ᴍᴇᴍᴏʀʏ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴀᴄᴛᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴄʀᴀᴢʏ. ᴘʀᴏᴍɪɴᴇɴᴛ ᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ꜱᴛᴜʀᴅʏ ʙᴏᴅʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴀ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ, ꜰᴏᴄᴜꜱᴇᴅ ɢᴀᴢᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴜᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰᴇᴍᴀʟᴇ ᴇʟᴇᴘʜᴀɴᴛ ᴄᴀɴ ᴀᴄᴛ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴄᴏʏ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴅᴇᴄɪᴅɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴜʟʟʏ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ɪɴ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴠᴇʀʏ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴛɪᴛᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴇꜱɪʀᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴏɴ ᴀ ꜱᴏᴜʟ ʟᴇᴠᴇʟ. ᴛᴀɴᴛʀɪᴄ ꜱᴇx ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇꜱᴛ ᴡᴀʏ ᴛᴏ ᴇxᴘʟᴀɪɴ ɪᴛ.

𝓚𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓽𝓲𝓴𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓼𝓱𝔂𝓪 🐑

ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴛᴏɪᴄ ᴀɴᴅ ʀᴇꜱᴇʀᴠᴇᴅ ᴜᴘᴏɴ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ɪᴍᴘʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ, ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴀꜱ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀʀɪɴɢ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴛʀᴀᴅɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʀᴜʟᴇꜱ, ʙᴇʟɪᴇᴠɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴏɴᴇ ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ʀᴏʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴀʏ. ꜱᴇʟꜰ-ᴄᴏɴꜱᴄɪᴏᴜꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ɴᴏᴛ ɪɴꜱᴇᴄᴜʀᴇ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴊᴜꜱᴛ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇʟꜰ. ᴀɴᴅʀᴏɢʏɴᴏᴜꜱ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴋʀɪᴛᴛɪᴋᴀ ɪꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇʟʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴜꜱʜʏᴀ ɪꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɢᴇɴᴛʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ꜱᴇx ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀɴ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴍɪx ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ʀᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴜᴀʟ. ɪɴᴛᴏ ʟᴇᴀᴠɪɴɢ ᴍᴀʀᴋꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴏʀ ʙᴇɪɴɢ ᴍᴀʀᴋᴇᴅ, ꜱᴄʀᴀᴛᴄʜɪɴɢ, ᴅɪɢɢɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ɴᴀɪʟꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ʏᴏᴜʀ ꜱᴋɪɴ, ᴇᴛᴄ.

𝓡𝓸𝓱𝓲𝓷𝓲, 𝓜𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓼𝓱𝓲𝓻𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐍

ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴘʀɪᴠᴀᴛᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴇʀɢɪᴇꜱ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴇɴᴊᴏʏ ʟɪᴠɪɴɢ ᴄᴏᴍꜰᴏʀᴛᴀʙʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴀʏ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴍᴀᴛᴇʀɪᴀʟ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ꜱᴇᴇɴ ᴀꜱ ᴀᴇꜱᴛʜᴇᴛɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ ᴘʟᴇᴀꜱɪɴɢ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ᴡᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴡᴏʀᴅꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴋɴᴏᴡꜱ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴛɪᴄᴋʏ ꜱɪᴛᴜᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴡᴏʀᴅꜱ ᴄᴀɴ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ɪɴ ᴛʀᴏᴜʙʟᴇ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰʟɪʀᴛᴀᴛɪᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ɪɴᴛᴏxɪᴄᴀᴛɪɴɢ. ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛɪꜰᴜʟ ᴇʏᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴇʟɪᴄᴀᴛᴇ ꜰɪɢᴜʀᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄᴀʟʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ʀᴜꜱʜᴇᴅ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠɪʟʏ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ᴡʜᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇꜱ ᴀꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏ ɪɴᴄʜ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴀɢᴀɪɴꜱᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ʀᴏᴘᴇ ʙᴜɴɴʏ ᴋɪɴᴋ. ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ᴡʀᴀᴘ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀʀᴍꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴇɢꜱ ᴛɪɢʜᴛʟʏ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ. ᴏɴᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴀᴋꜱʜᴀᴛʀᴀꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇ ɪɴ ʙᴅꜱᴍ (ʀᴏʜɪɴɪ ɪꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ) ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛɪᴠɪᴛʏ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴅᴏᴇꜱɴ'ᴛ ɪɴᴠᴏʟᴠᴇ ᴘʜʏꜱɪᴄᴀʟ ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴀᴛ ᴀʟʟ.

𝓐𝓻𝓭𝓻𝓪, 𝓜𝓾𝓵𝓪 🐕

ʟᴏʏᴀʟ ᴀɴᴅ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ɪɴᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴜᴀʟꜱ, ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴛᴏᴏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴄᴀɴᴅɪᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ꜱᴜɢᴇʀᴄᴏᴀᴛ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴛᴇʟʟ ɪᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ɪᴛ ɪꜱ. ᴘʀᴏᴛᴇᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏᴡᴀʀᴅꜱ ᴛʜᴏꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ʜᴇꜱɪᴛᴀᴛᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴀ ʙᴜʟʟᴇᴛ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ʀᴜᴛʜʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏʟᴅ ɪꜰ ʙᴇᴛʀᴀʏᴇᴅ ɪɴ ᴀɴʏ ᴡᴀʏ. ᴡɪʟᴅ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛʀɪᴋɪɴɢ ᴇʏᴇꜱ. ʙᴇɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴀ ꜰᴏʀᴇꜱᴛ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʀʀᴏᴜɴᴅᴇᴅ ʙʏ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴍᴀᴋᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴀᴛ ᴇᴀꜱᴇ. ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʟɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ʀᴜʀᴀʟ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴜɴɪᴛɪᴇꜱ ᴏʀ ʜᴏᴜꜱᴇꜱ ɴᴇᴀʀ ᴡᴏᴏᴅꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟʟʏ ʙᴏɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡɪʟʟ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴄʟɪɴɢʏ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀ ꜱᴇx, ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴜᴅᴅʟᴇ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀᴡᴀʀᴅꜱ. ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ɪꜱɴ'ᴛ ᴏɴ ᴘᴀʀ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴀɢɪᴛᴀᴛᴇᴅ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴏᴠɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴀꜱꜱɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ɪɴ ʙᴇᴅ.

𝓟𝓾𝓷𝓪𝓻𝓿𝓪𝓼𝓾, 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓱𝓪 🐈‍⬛

ʟᴀɴɢᴜɪᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰɪɴɴɪᴄᴋʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴘᴀʀᴛɪᴄᴜʟᴀʀ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴡʜᴏ ʟᴇᴛ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴀꜱɪʟʏ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ᴅɪꜱᴛᴜʀʙᴇᴅ. ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴍᴏᴏᴅʏ ꜱᴏ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴄʟɪɴɢʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀꜰꜰᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏɴᴇ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴀꜱꜱʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀɴɴᴏʏᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇxᴛ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ. ᴄᴀɴ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀ ɪɴɴᴏᴄᴇɴᴛ ʏᴇᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴛʜᴀɴ ʏᴏᴜ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴜʙᴛʟʏ ᴍᴀɴɪᴘᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ. ᴀʟᴍᴏɴᴅ-ꜱʜᴀᴘᴇᴅ ᴇʏᴇꜱ, ꜱʟɪᴍ ɴᴏꜱᴇ, ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟ ʟɪᴘꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ'ꜱ ꜰᴇʟɪɴᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴀɪɴᴛʏ ɪɴ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀᴀɴᴄᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴡʜᴏ'ꜱ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇꜰᴜʟ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴʏ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴇᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴏꜰꜰ. ᴀꜱʜʟᴇꜱʜᴀ ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ʜᴀʀᴅᴇʀ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ɪꜱꜱᴜᴇꜱ ʀᴇɢᴀʀᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟɪᴛʏ (ᴛʜᴇ ᴍᴀʟᴇ ᴄᴀᴛ ʜᴀᴠɪɴɢ ᴀ ʙᴀʀʙᴇᴅ ᴘ*ɴɪꜱ). ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ᴅᴇꜱɪʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴘʟᴀʏ ᴀɴᴅ ʟɪᴋᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴄʜᴏᴋᴇᴅ. ᴘᴜɴᴀʀᴠᴀꜱᴜ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ʙʀᴀᴛᴛʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴡʜɪʟᴇ ᴀꜱʜʟᴇꜱʜᴀ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴀɴᴅᴀʀᴅ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ.

𝓜𝓪𝓰𝓱𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓟𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓲 🐀

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴠᴏʀᴀᴄɪᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴅɪᴠɪᴅᴜᴀʟꜱ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴇʟꜰ-ᴄᴇɴᴛᴇʀᴇᴅ ʙᴜᴛ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴜɴᴄᴀʀɪɴɢ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴊᴜꜱᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴇɢᴏꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴘʀɪᴅᴇ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ꜱᴛᴏʟᴇɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴏᴛᴛᴇɴ ᴀᴡᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ɪᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ɪɴ ᴛᴇɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀᴀɴᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ʀᴇᴍᴀɪɴɪɴɢ ᴘʀᴇꜱᴇɴᴛᴀʙʟᴇ. ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴʟᴇꜱꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴜᴛꜱɪᴅᴇ. ʙɪɢ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʜᴀᴜɢʜᴛʏ ɪᴍᴘʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴏɴ, ᴇꜰꜰᴏʀᴛʟᴇꜱꜱʟʏ ᴀᴛᴛʀᴀᴄᴛꜱ ᴀᴛᴛᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇɴ'ᴛ ᴀꜰʀᴀɪᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴛᴀʙᴏᴏ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʀᴀᴢɪᴇꜱᴛ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴋɪɴᴋꜱ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ʟᴏᴡ-ᴋᴇʏ ᴄᴏɴᴄᴇʀɴɪɴɢ. ᴇɴᴅʟᴇꜱꜱ ꜱᴛᴀᴍɪɴᴀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʜᴀᴍᴇʟᴇꜱꜱ ɪɴ ʙᴇʜᴀᴠɪᴏʀ. ᴍᴀʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴘʀᴀɪꜱᴇ ᴋɪɴᴋ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀᴛᴛᴇɴᴛɪᴏɴ ᴛɪᴄᴋʟᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴏᴜʟ.

𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓟𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓲, 𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓪 🐄

ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴏɴꜱɪꜱᴛᴇɴᴛ, ɴᴏᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʀᴜꜱʜ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ᴛᴏ ᴡᴀɪᴛ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴀʀɪꜱᴇꜱ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʀɪɢʜᴛ ᴍᴏᴍᴇɴᴛ. ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅʀɪɴᴋ ᴍɪʟᴋ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰᴇʀᴛɪʟᴇ. ꜱᴇᴇɴ ᴀꜱ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴇʀꜰᴇᴄᴛ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴀʟ, ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ʀᴇꜱᴛɪɴɢ ʙʟᴀɴᴋ ꜰᴀᴄᴇ. ᴅɪꜰꜰɪᴄᴜʟᴛ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪɴ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟ. ꜱQᴜᴀʀɪꜱʜ ꜰᴀᴄᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛᴇᴀᴅʏ ɢᴀᴢᴇ, ᴡᴇʟʟ-ꜰᴏʀᴍᴇᴅ ʙᴏᴅɪᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴇᴀꜱɪʟʏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴘʀᴇɢɴᴀɴᴛ (ꜰᴏʀ ᴍᴇɴ, ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʟᴏᴀᴅꜱ ᴀʀᴇ ʜᴇᴀᴠʏ) ᴀɴᴅ ᴀʀᴇ ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴍᴜʟᴛɪᴘʟᴇ ᴋɪᴅꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘʀᴇꜰᴇʀ ᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ɢᴇᴛ ᴍᴀᴅ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴘᴜꜱʜᴇᴅ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜱᴘᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴜᴘ. ᴍᴀʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴀʏ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʜᴇꜱᴛ ᴀʀᴇᴀ. ᴍᴏꜱᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴠᴀɴɪʟʟᴀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱɪᴍᴘʟᴇ-ᴍɪɴᴅᴇᴅ.

𝓗𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓢𝔀𝓪𝓽𝓲 🐂

ᴛʜᴇ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ɪꜱ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜱᴛᴜʙʙᴏʀɴ ʙᴜᴛ, ɪꜰ ʏᴏᴜ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʙᴜᴛᴛᴏɴꜱ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ɢᴇᴛ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ʀᴏᴡᴅʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠɪᴏʟᴇɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀɴɢᴇʀ ɪꜱ ɴᴏ ᴊᴏᴋᴇ. ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ʜᴀɴᴅ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ʀᴇꜱɪʟɪᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴀʟᴜᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴇᴠᴇʀᴀɴᴄᴇ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ. ᴡᴀᴛᴇʀ ʀᴇᴘʟᴇɴɪꜱʜᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ꜰᴏʀ ꜱᴡᴇᴇᴛꜱ. ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴀɴᴅ ʙᴏʟᴅ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴏᴘᴇɴ ᴇʏᴇꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡɪʟʟ ᴄᴏɴꜱɪꜱᴛᴇɴᴛʟʏ ᴘᴜꜱʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜰɪɴᴀʟʟʏ ɢɪᴠᴇ ɪɴ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴅᴠᴀɴᴄᴇꜱ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀʙɪʟɪᴛʏ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴘᴀᴛɪᴇɴᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ɴᴏᴛ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ, ɪᴛ ɪʀʀɪᴛᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ꜱᴀᴅɪꜱᴛɪᴄ ᴅᴏᴍꜱ.

𝓒𝓱𝓲𝓽𝓻𝓪, 𝓥𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓴𝓪 🐅

ᴏᴜᴛᴡᴀʀᴅʟʏ ᴄᴏɴꜰɪᴅᴇɴᴛ, ɪɴᴡᴀʀᴅʟʏ ɪɴꜱᴇᴄᴜʀᴇ. ꜱᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴘʀᴇꜱᴇɴᴄᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀɪɴᴛᴀɪɴ ᴀ ꜱᴇɴꜱᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴠɪʀᴏɴᴍᴇɴᴛ, ɪᴛ ᴋᴇᴇᴘꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜱᴀɴᴇ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰᴀꜱʜɪᴏɴᴀʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏᴠᴇꜱ ᴊᴇᴡᴇʟʀʏ ᴏʀ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴀᴄᴄᴇꜱꜱᴏʀɪᴇꜱ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀʀᴇ ᴀ ʟᴏᴛ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴘɪɴɪᴏɴꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜰᴏᴏᴛ-ɪɴ-ᴍᴏᴜᴛʜ ᴅɪꜱᴇᴀꜱᴇ. ꜱʟɪɢʜᴛʟʏ ᴡɪʟᴅ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰɪᴇʀᴄᴇ ɢᴀᴢᴇ, ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ꜱᴍɪʟᴇ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʀᴇᴀʟʟʏ ʀᴏᴄᴋ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ (ɪꜰ ʏᴋ ʏᴋ). ᴡᴏᴜʟᴅ ʙᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴡʀᴇꜱᴛʟᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ɪɴᴛᴏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴏɴ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ᴇᴠᴇʀ ꜱᴛᴇᴘꜱ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏꜰ ʟɪɴᴇ (ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏᴍᴇɴ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴘᴘᴏꜱɪᴛᴇ). ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏɴᴇꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ʙᴇɪɴɢ ᴄᴀʟʟᴇᴅ ᴅᴀᴅᴅʏ/ᴍᴏᴍᴍʏ, ɪᴛ ʀᴇᴀʟʟʏ ꜰᴇᴇᴅꜱ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏɴᴛʀᴏʟʟɪɴɢ, ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀꜱᴘᴇᴄᴛ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇᴍ. ᴘʀᴏɴᴇ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴄʜᴇᴀᴛᴇʀꜱ, ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ.

𝓐𝓷𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪, 𝓙𝔂𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓱𝓪 🦌

ᴇɴᴠɪʀᴏɴᴍᴇɴᴛᴀʟʟʏ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ, ꜱᴏᴄɪᴀʟʟʏ ᴜɴᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ. ᴄᴀɴ ꜰɪɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ɪɴ ꜱɪᴛᴜᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴡʜᴇʀᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ᴜꜱᴇᴅ ɪɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ᴡᴀʏ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ꜱᴏ ɢɪᴠɪɴɢ. ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ, ɴᴏ ᴍᴀᴛᴛᴇʀ ʜᴏᴡ ɪɴᴛɪᴍɪᴅᴀᴛɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴍᴀʏ ᴀᴘᴘᴇᴀʀ. ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ꜰᴇᴇʟꜱ ᴛʜᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴏɴ ɢᴜᴀʀᴅ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛɪᴍᴇ. ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟʟʏ ꜱᴇɴꜱɪᴛɪᴠᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘᴜᴛꜱ ᴍᴜʟᴛɪᴘʟᴇ ᴡᴀʟʟꜱ ᴜᴘ, ᴍᴀᴋɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴅɪꜰꜰɪᴄᴜʟᴛ ᴛᴏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ꜱɪɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴠᴀɢᴜᴇ. ꜱʟᴇɴᴅᴇʀ ꜰᴀᴄᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴏᴇ ᴇʏᴇꜱ. ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴍᴀᴋᴇꜱ ʏᴏᴜ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴄʜᴀꜱᴇ ᴀꜰᴛᴇʀ ᴛʜᴇᴍ, ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴋɪɴᴅ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴄᴀʀʏ ʜᴏᴡ ᴍᴜᴄʜ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ. ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ Qᴜɪᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴏʙꜱᴇʀᴠᴀɴᴛ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴘᴜᴛ ᴀʟʟ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇᴍᴏᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ꜰᴏʀᴡᴀʀᴅ ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ Qᴜɪᴛᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀᴡʜᴇʟᴍɪɴɢ. ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴀɢɢʀᴇꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴᴀʟɪᴛɪᴇꜱ ᴄᴀɴ ᴏᴠᴇʀᴡʜᴇʟᴍ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ʙᴇ ꜱᴏ Qᴜɪᴄᴋ ᴛᴏ ʀᴜɴ ᴀᴡᴀʏ ɪꜰ ɪᴛ'ꜱ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ. ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴇxᴘʟᴏʀᴀᴛɪᴠᴇ. ʙᴇɪɴɢ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀ ꜱᴏᴍᴇʜᴏᴡ ꜰᴇᴇʟꜱ ᴠɪᴏʟᴀᴛɪɴɢ ɪɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇ ᴡᴀʏ ꜱᴏ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ꜰᴏʀᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ. ᴇɴɢᴀɢᴇꜱ ɪɴ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ᴀᴄᴛɪᴠɪᴛʏ ᴏɴʟʏ ᴡʜᴇɴ ɪɴ ᴀ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘ, ʟᴇꜱꜱ ʟɪᴋᴇʟʏ ᴛᴏ ᴄʜᴇᴀᴛ (ᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅꜱ).

𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪, 𝓢𝓱𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓪 🐒

ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟᴏᴜᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇʟʏ ᴏᴘɪɴɪᴏɴᴀᴛᴇᴅ, ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ʙᴏᴀꜱᴛꜰᴜʟ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ʟᴏᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ꜰᴜɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀᴀᴠᴇʟ ᴛᴏ ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴛ ᴘᴀʀᴛꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ, ɪᴛ ɢɪᴠᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴀ ᴄᴇʀᴛᴀɪɴ ʀᴜꜱʜ ᴏꜰ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ. ᴘʀᴏʙᴀʙʟʏ ʟɪᴋᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴏᴠᴇ ᴀʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ɪɴ ɢʀᴏᴜᴘꜱ ᴏʀ ᴏɴᴇ ᴀɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴ (ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅ, ꜰᴀᴍɪʟʏ, ᴇᴛᴄ). ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴀ ʙɪᴛ ᴍɪꜱᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴏᴜꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʀɪᴄᴋʏ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ꜱᴡɪᴛᴄʜ ᴜᴘ ᴏɴ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴏɴᴇ ɪɴꜱᴛᴀɴᴛʟʏ. ʟᴏɴɢ ꜰᴀᴄᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ʟᴏɴɢ ʟɪᴍʙꜱ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴠᴇʀʏ ꜰʟᴇxɪʙʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴠᴇʀꜱᴀᴛɪʟᴇ (ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ ᴍᴀɴʏ ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴛ ᴘᴏꜱɪᴛɪᴏɴꜱ ᴋɴᴏᴡɴ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀɴ). ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ʙᴇ ᴇxʜɪʙɪᴛɪᴏɴɪꜱᴛꜱ ᴀꜱ ᴡᴇʟʟ, ʙᴏᴛʜ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴇɴᴇʀᴀʟʟʏ. ᴠᴇʀʏ ʟɪɢʜᴛ-ʜᴇᴀʀᴛᴇᴅ ᴀɴᴅ ᴘʟᴀʏꜰᴜʟ, ᴍᴀʏ ᴄʀᴀᴄᴋ ᴊᴏᴋᴇꜱ ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀᴄᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴋᴇᴇᴘ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀᴇꜱᴛɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇᴅʀᴏᴏᴍ.

𝓤𝓽𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓐𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓱𝓪

ꜰᴀɪʀʟʏ ɪɴᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅᴇɴᴛ, ᴛʜɪɴᴋꜱ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰᴜᴛᴜʀᴇ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ. ʙᴀᴛᴛʟᴇꜱ ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢ ʟᴏɴᴇʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ꜰᴇᴇʟɪɴɢ ᴀʟᴏɴᴇ. ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ʀᴇᴠᴏʟᴜᴛɪᴏɴᴀʀʏ ᴍɪɴᴅꜱᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴇᴇᴋꜱ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ɢᴏᴏᴅ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴡᴏʀʟᴅ. ꜰʀɪᴇɴᴅꜱʜɪᴘꜱ ᴄᴏᴍᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ɢᴏᴇꜱ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀᴡᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ɴᴏᴛʜɪɴɢ ʟᴀꜱᴛ ꜰᴏʀᴇᴠᴇʀ. ꜱᴍᴀʟʟ ꜰᴇᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ᴘʀᴏᴍɪɴᴇɴᴛ ᴊᴀᴡ. ᴛʜᴇ ᴜɴᴅᴇʀᴄᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴛʀᴇɴᴅꜱᴇᴛᴛᴇʀꜱ.

ɪɴ ᴛᴇʀᴍꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟ ʀᴇʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴꜱʜɪᴘꜱ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴘʀᴇᴛᴛʏ ꜱɪᴍᴘʟᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴛʀᴀɪɢʜᴛ-ꜰᴏʀᴡᴀʀᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʟʟ ɢᴏ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ ɪᴛ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴅᴏ ᴛʜɪɴɢꜱ ᴛᴏᴏ ᴇxᴛʀᴇᴍᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ᴠᴀɴɪʟʟᴀ ɪɴ ʙᴇᴅ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ᴍɪᴅᴅʟᴇ ɢʀᴏᴜɴᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴇᴠᴇʀʏᴛʜɪɴɢ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ꜱᴛʀɪᴠᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʟᴇᴀꜱᴇ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ɢᴏ ᴏᴠᴇʀʙᴏᴀʀᴅ. ᴜᴛᴛᴀʀᴀ ᴀꜱʜᴀᴅʜᴀꜱ (ᴅᴇᴘᴇɴᴅɪɴɢ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ɢᴇɴᴅᴇʀ) ᴀʀᴇ ᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ꜱᴜʙᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴠᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴛʀɪᴄᴛʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ.

𝓓𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓱𝓽𝓪, 𝓟𝓾𝓻𝓿𝓪 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓪 🦁

ʜᴜɢᴇ ᴘᴇʀꜱᴏɴᴀʟɪᴛɪᴇꜱ, ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴀʟᴡᴀʏꜱ ɴᴏᴛɪᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀʟᴋ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀ ʀᴏᴏᴍ. ᴄᴀʀʀɪᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇᴍꜱᴇʟᴠᴇꜱ ᴀꜱ ɪꜰ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴀʟʟʏ ʙᴏʀɴ ʀᴏʏᴀʟᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ɪꜱ ᴏꜰᴛᴇɴ ᴛʀᴇᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴀꜱ ꜱᴜᴄʜ. ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀ ʟɪᴛᴛʟᴇ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ-ʜᴜɴɢʀʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴄᴀɴ ʟᴇᴛ ᴛʜɪꜱ ɢᴇᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ʜᴇᴀᴅꜱ ᴀᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇꜱ. ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴛʜᴇʏ ɢᴇᴛ ᴍᴀᴅ, ʏᴏᴜ'ʟʟ ᴡɪꜱʜ ʏᴏᴜ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ꜱᴀɪᴅ ᴀɴʏᴛʜɪɴɢ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ꜰɪʀꜱᴛ ᴘʟᴀᴄᴇ. ʟᴏɴɢ ᴀʙᴜɴᴅᴀɴᴛ ᴀᴍᴏᴜɴᴛꜱ ᴏꜰ ʜᴀɪʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍᴏꜱᴛʟʏ ᴛᴀʟʟ ɪɴ ʜᴇɪɢʜᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʜᴜɢᴇ ꜰʀᴀᴍᴇꜱ.

ꜱᴇxᴜᴀʟʟʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ᴀʟꜱᴏ ɪɴᴛᴇɴꜱᴇ ʙᴜᴛ ɪɴ ᴀ ᴏᴠᴇʀʟʏ ᴄᴏɴꜱᴜᴍɪɴɢ ᴡᴀʏ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴡᴀɴᴛ ʏᴏᴜ ᴛᴏ ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ, ᴛʜᴇʏ'ʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏᴠᴇʀʟʏ ɢᴇɴᴛʟᴇ ᴏʀ ᴠᴜʟɴᴇʀᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛʏᴘᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴘᴀʀᴛɴᴇʀꜱ (ᴛʜᴇʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ꜱᴏᴍᴇᴏɴᴇ ᴡʜᴏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴍᴀᴛᴄʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ꜰʀᴇᴀᴋ). ᴅᴇꜰɪɴɪᴛᴇʟʏ ᴅᴏᴍɪɴᴀɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴛᴇᴇᴛᴇʀ ᴏꜰꜰ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʀᴏʟᴇ. ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴄᴀɴ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ʏᴏᴜ ꜰᴇᴇʟ ꜱᴘᴇᴄɪᴀʟ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜ.

(I know y'all were waiting for this post for a bit but here it is :) I hope you enjoyed reading it and comment down below if anything resonates.)

When I shifted for the first time, I wasn't doing anything special.

I didn't embody my Dr self, I didn't affirm throughout the day, I didn't pretend to be somewhere I was not. I didn't visualize, I didn't script, I didn't even set an intention.

I put on a subliminal, took a nap, and woke up in a different reality.

I'm not saying this to tell you to stop everything you're doing, I'm not saying your methods are wrong or your reality checks are an overkill... I'm only saying this because I too have tried literally everything under the sun for years before I shifted and all it took was a nap.

Shifting is a simple or as complicated as you want it to be. If you assume that you don't have to do anything to shift, and you hold that assumption near and dear to your heart, you will shift without doing anything. The funny thing is that at the time I didn't even have that assumption, but every time I shifted after that I wasn't doing anything special. Yes my shifts have not lasted as long as the first one yet, but the point is:

I shifted.

And so will you.

And lastly, I would like to share with you this beautiful success story that I got under my subliminal yesterday:

Happy shifting ❤️

How to manifest your SP:

Yall made me crazy with this, and please no more questions "HOW TO MANIFEST MY SP?"!

(if yall wondering about my type, it's dark haired guys 😉)

Stop putting them on the pedestal!

I'm gonna say this many times, stop putting your SP on the pedestal, they're just human, whether they're celebrities, models, hot and Athletic, popular in your high school, a rich man, they're JUST humans, they also have insecurities, doubt, sad days, bad days, they're not perfect and you are not too.

Start working on your self-concept:

If you don't know, self-concept is important, it represent how you view your world, and your assumption create your reality, and since the World is just a mirror so it's gonna show you what you assume.

I know when you hear about self-concept it seems like a lot of work, but it's really simple.

What it is then?

Stop assuming things you don't want to! And start assuming better things!

For example: you assume and believe that men aren't loyal, trash and they're cheaters and that you never will get into a happy relationship blah blah blah, guess what? That what you'll be seeing, if you change your assumption saying that you deserve the best and your partners are Always loyal and dedicated and devoted to you and treat you like a princess, then that what you're gonna see.

As for my story after an incident, i realised that i should stop chasing after guys and it should be the opposite instead, i held the assumption that guys Always chase after me and they're Always obsessed with me, i always play hard to get and it seriously fun and amusing 😏.

So start assuming the best for yourself, start assuming that you always get treated like a princess by men, Always getting spoiled by them, Always finding your dream ideal partners and that they only see you and only you and are obsessed and completely devoted to you.

Now here's the real question that you all been waiting for 🥁🥁🥁 -

How do i manifest my SP?

If you want to manifest your dream partner from scratch, you can check my post here ➜ (click me!).

Now before i tell you how to manifest your SP, i want you to actually think that it is easy to manifest them, okay?

Now here it is the steps-

Decide & Assume: decide that right now your SP is already in love with you and assume he's obsessed with you and you both are already in a healthy relationship, going on a dates, him spoiling you (of course because you deserve it honey💅🙄).

Affirm: choose your ideal affirmation that represent that you and your SP are already in a relationship.

For example:

"my SP asked me out already and now we're in a healthy happy relationship"

"my SP is the most perfect boyfriend i've ever had!"

"my SP is so obsessed with me and he's so devoted to me!"

"my SP's eyes are only on me and i'm special in his eyes"

"my SP is so loyal to me, and i'm the only one for him, forever mine and i'm forever his"

Persist: now here comes the most important thing you need to do, no matter what the 3d shows you, you need to keep assuming your current assumption and keep sticking to it, cause you know it's a fact, because duh your SP is yours.

Persist persist persist! Your SP is already yours!

Now let's go to answering your questions-

What if he's my celebrity crush?

Girl/boy, that doesn't matter, no one have free will, and your celebrity crush is a human too not an angel, your assumption is what is true, even if your not that attractive, your SP will love you, because you deserve it, and it's your reality.

Can i manifest my SP even if we broke up two years ago?

Of course you can, you can assume that you both never broke up and your relationship is still going and is healthy.

Can i manifest my SP even if we just met at the airport?

Of course you can, even if you both just met once, you can still manifest them, and you both can meet in different ways, just let the work to your subconscious and trust it.

But my SP doesn't even know i exist😢

Bitch who said that huh? You assume they're yours, then they're yours, period.

Stop assuming negative assumption damn it!

But my hard circumstances 😢-

Circumstances doesn't mean shit, when you say you have your SP, then you have them, end of discussion.

Now that i have cleared up everything and made everything seems simple and easy, now i don't want to hear you all whining about your SPs never again, act like the queen/king you are, and alter your reality because you're the creator of it.

The answer to all your questions: just assume, assume you already have it.

Xoxo, Eli