Lowkey started licking my screen đ
Taking a female character who belongs to a non-majority group of bigger, muscular women in a video game and making her a very skinny person in the TV show adaptation of said video game is problematic and worthy of (respectful) criticism and Iâm tired of pretending itâs not. Because the creators of the TV show said they specifically offered the actor who plays this character the part. She even said she didnât even have to audition in an interview, she was offered the role with no audition for it. No hate to this actor, sheâs amazing, sheâs out here working, I donât blame her at all. But they also did not have other actors (or if they did, very few) read for the part.
But I am so sick of people acting like the characterâs original physique doesnât matter. It DOES MATTER. Media has power, and purposefully erasing a part of a characterâs physical identity that aligns her with a group of women who are either grossly misrepresented in traditional media or just cut out of it completely IS harmful. And the fact that they used her physicality to market the second game so heavily and then abandon it when the reception wasnât good for the TV show is SO problematic. Bigger women are not there to simply be movement devices for your plot and aesthetic choices. People who are bigger matter, and having representation of bigger women fucking matters.
hi đ©” could you write how you hc abby's sexuality and why? what are the details in the game you noticed that support your hc? i love to think of abby as either pan or les, i feel like both could be her. but i feel very sad thinking she's straight :(. maybe someone like you explaining why they think abby is sapphic and using her personality to support your hc will help me out! kind regards :)
Donât be sad about her potentially being straight!! Sheâs not explicitly stated as anything, so all headcanons are welcome and equally valid. My personal opinion is that Abby is pansexual or unlabeled, but regardless, queer. She strikes me as someone who doesnât lead with labels or make her identity a point of definitionâmore of a âI love who I loveâ kind of person. She seems like someone who would fall for people who make her feel safe and seen. She lost her father young. She never had a maternal model. She grew up in a militant environment where vulnerability was dangerous. That means her emotional connection to others, especially romantic onesâis probably built slowly, from trust and shared experience, rather than immediate spark or gendered attraction. Sheâs not someone whoâs chasing âthe ideaâ of a partner, sheâs someone who responds to the actual person in front of her. That also makes her more open to falling for people across gender lines, without needing to categorize it. That leads me to believe her sexuality isnât rigid, and certainly not defined by gender.
Sheâs not shown being attracted to women, but the absence of that doesnât mean anything. The game doesnât give us any hints that sheâs been romantically or sexually involved with a woman, but thatâs probably because her story is hyper focused on revenge, grief, and survival. Romantic or sexual tension outside of Owen doesnât really enter the picture, even in subtle ways. Her world is narrow and purpose driven. But she never really says anything heteronormative or dismissive about queer identity either. Through her emotional bonds we see that she connects deeply with people regardless of gender. She forms emotional trust slowly but completely. Sheâs drawn to connection and shared values. Her attraction and trust are built through shared experience. She doesnât label herself, ever, and I think she wouldnât feel the need to unless it became relevant. She has the emotional openness and grounded practicality of someone who loves people, not categories.
Her relationship with femininity, identity, and emotional expression is deeply shaped by both her trauma and her personality. Abby doesnât perform femininity in a socially conventional wayânot because sheâs rejecting it, but because it was never central to her identity. Because sheâs deeply disconnected from the âexpectedâ version of traditional femininity; makeup, dresses, dainty behavior, emotional expressiveness on demand, sheâs free from typical gendered expectations. Instead of trying to mold herself into it, she leans further into strength, practicality, and stoicismâwhich many queer women do when they grow up without a roadmap for softness that includes them. Since she didnât have a mother to model that femininity, she was probably never taught or encouraged to engage with gender roles or a girlier side of herself. That left her with space to become someone shaped more by function, purpose, and self sufficiency than aesthetics or gendered performance. She made her own path, and it led her toward strength. That kind of emotional detachment from traditional markers of femininity often coincides with queernessânot because masc presenting women are automatically queer, but because a lack of socialized attachment to gender roles often opens the door for questioning everything those roles are connected to, including attraction and identity. Abby doesnât feel like someone who needs to define herself by how sheâs perceived. She just is.
The Owen relationship was real, but complicated. Abby and Owen were in love, and yes, thereâs genuine chemistry and affection there. But thereâs also a deep emotional misalignment, especially as time goes on. Owen becomes more idealistic, passive, and emotionally confused, while Abby doubles down on discipline, action, and keeping herself mentally resilient. Some people interpret the tension in their relationship as a sign Abby was never really attracted to himâjust going through the motions out of obligation or comphet. But I disagree. I think she genuinely loved him, was physically attracted to him, and cared deeply. The boat scene (awkwardness aside) is reciprocated by her and it seemed like she wanted that connection in the moment. However, love â compatibility. She loved Owen, but she outgrew him. I think that says more about Abbyâs growth and trauma, not a reflection of her sexual orientation.
Could she be a lesbian experiencing comphet? Sure, itâs not impossible, I personally just didnât read her that way, even as someone who has struggled with comphet themselves. Abby doesnât show signs of resenting or disassociating from her relationship with Owen (in my opinion) just the circumstances surrounding their entanglement. Sheâs not passive in it, and she initiates physical and emotional intimacy. That doesnât feel like compulsory heterosexuality, it feels like a real (but flawed) relationship that she outgrew, and possibly even a trauma bond. As badly as I want to see her with a woman, she could very well meet another man, fall for him and have a healthy relationship. That being said if they did make her a lesbian in part 3 (if we ever get it) Iâd be ecstatic!
Abby is often misreadâby both in world characters and players, as âtoo masculine,â âmanly,â or even âunnatural.â That dissonance between how she looks and how the world interprets it could deeply resonate for a lot of queer people who donât fit binary beauty standards. But Abby doesnât apologize for her strength. She owns it. And that quiet defiance is queer as hell. She clearly knows that others see her body and think she looks âtoo masculineâ or âunattractive,â but she never apologizes for it. She chooses function over appearance, strength over daintinessânot to perform, but because thatâs who she is. She has self assurance in spite of being misunderstood by others and refuses to shrink herself to meet their standards.
Abbyâs strength isnât just for survivalâitâs a core part of her self concept. Fitness isnât just part of her job. Itâs how she processes life. She builds her body with intention, as a form of control, agency, and emotional regulation. That kind of deliberate relationship with oneâs body might mirror experiences, particularly for masc-leaning queer women or nonbinary peopleâwho use physicality as both a shield and a sense of self in a world that doesnât always see them clearly. Her muscles arenât accidental. Theyâre a statement. Theyâre her armor, but also her identity. I do think Abbyâs relationship with fitness, strength, and her body can be viewed as queer, even if itâs not exclusively so. In the context of the WLF, being strong is practical. Itâs survival. It makes sense that she would train hard regardless of her identity, especially given her role. Itâs not explicitly gay that sheâs jacked and likes working out. But what those choices mean emotionally, and how they contrast with heteronormative expectations is. The way she uses her body as a vessel of identity, control, and love? That can absolutely be read through a queer lensâand meaningfully so.
How Abby interacts with Lev is so important. The way she immediately accepts Levâno hesitation, no confusion, no need to ask questions, is incredibly telling. That kind of instinctive affirmation doesnât just scream ally, it suggests lived empathy. She leads with respect, action, and emotional intelligence, especially when someone is vulnerable. And in Levâs case, she never misgenders him, she defends him immediately, even against her own people. She doesnât act like heâs âdifferent.â She just includes him. This doesnât automatically mean Abby is queer herself, of courseâbut when you combine this with everything else, it does start to look like someone who may have a personal understanding of what it means to feel different, unlabeled, or quietly shunnedâand who maybe recognizes something familiar in Levâs journey, even if they never talk about it directly. It feels like a silent kind of solidarity, even without any explicit confirmation.
This is subjective, but even her energy itself doesnât seem completely straight. She feels queer coded in the way she carries herself. Not just because sheâs muscular or rejects feminine norms (that alone isnât a marker of queerness), but because she moves through the world in a way that doesnât seem gendered. Sheâs not very verbally expressive, but she uses physicality as a languageâtraining, protecting others, touching carefully, fighting hard. That embodiment of love, grief and control through action is a deeply somatic and queer way to navigate the world, especially when words donât feel safe or available. Abby feels deeply, but she doesnât always name or process her feelings in real time. That could mean her understanding of her own sexuality might not even be clearly labeled, even to herself. She might not ever stop and ask herself because her emotional compass doesnât run on theoretical self definition. It runs on who makes her feel safe, connected, alive. Itâs fluid.
All of this builds a strong case for Abby being queer in essence and practice, even if sheâs never labeled that way in canon. So while itâs totally valid for someone to read her as straight, gay, bi, pan, or questioning, my take is that sheâs pan or unlabeled queer, with a deep capacity for connection that transcends gender. It just hasnât been fully explored yet because her story arc was focused on trauma, redemption, and survivalânot identity.
i hope that answers your question, sorry it took me a minute to get back to you. if you read this far thanks for stopping by! đ€
clingy!abby who sets an alarm 5 minutes early before work so she can snuggle before she leaves
clingy!abby always sitting on the same side of the booth as you when you go out to eat
clingy!abby always wrapped around you from behind, her head on your shoulder
clingy!abby whoâs hand is always in your lap
clingy!abby pressing kisses to your temple whenever youâre around other people
clingy!abby who always wants to just go home and cuddle
clingy!abby sipping from your straw and sneaking food off your plate
clingy!abby living in an âi â€ïž my gfâ shirt
clingy!abby playing with your hair and telling you how beautiful you are
clingy!abby always pulling you into her lap, tangling your legs together
clingy!abby always knowing what you need before you even have to ask
clingy!abby stopping by to see you on your break and bring you lunch (with a little note slipped inside)
aside from what people may assume, abby actually canonically is a really huge fan of classical music and jazz! combining that with her quiet, introspective personality and the emotional depth she hides beneath the surface, i think sheâd be drawn to modern artists who feel soulful, instrumental, and emotionally grounded. music that sits with you rather than demands your attention, and probably a bit niche rather than mainstream.
here are some modern artists i think abby would like:
Laufey, Ălafur Arnalds / Nils Frahm, Hiatus Kaiyote, H.E.R, Daniel Caesar, Norah Jones, Jorja Smith, Faye Webster, Leon Bridges, Hozier, Frank Ocean, Cigarettes After Sex, The Neighbourhood, The MarĂas, Agnes Obel, Mitski, Brent Faiyaz, Florence + The Machine, Phoebe Bridgers, Yebba, Deftones, Chelsea Wolfe
sooo why did no one ever tell me the name abigail literally means âmy fathers joyâ?
iâm actually gonna go bawl my eyes out now! oh jerry and abby my shaylas đ