Latest Posts by iril - Page 6
A lot of people don’t learn terms, they decide what they mean based on vibes and then will argue to the death that their definition they make up is correct. All the dictionaries in the world at your fingertips and social media has made people this lazy and complacent. Not every word is a slang term you can learn by vibes alone
I'd be less depressed and blackpilled if people were more honest about moid evil. We're all living in it, we all see it yet it's denied. Not only is it denied but moids are loved and defended despite all their cruelty. Excuses are made for them. Despite all the hatred moids show they're treated like injured animals rather than the terrorists they are. It's maddening. Women have been conditioned to hate other women & girls and love moids despite everything. Many women are ready to throw another woman under the bus to save their own skin. So in the end it's so isolating.
The thing that makes gaslighting torture isn't the primary abuse but the constant denial of the abuse as it's right in front of you. That's what drives you to insanity as you're being told what you perceive isn't so while you can see it there. It's one thing to recognise abuse and move accordingly but when it's denied outright it's another thing. Instead of primarily dealing with the abuse at hand you're dealing with proving the abuse is there in the first place. Protip: dont do this, just walk away from people who deny - it's not worth arguing the obvious; most people are more aware than they let on.
Because when I think about when women are most powerful, I immediately think of women who are literally virgins, who know exactly who they are. Before they have internalized the gaze of men and adjusted their behaviour accordingly, they exude confidence, competence, independence and completeness.
If I'm being honest I think that the worsening of boys grades in school over the past few decades is due to the rise in single motherhood. I mean let's be real, most heterosexual women are pathetic pick mes. When they have sons they refuse to discipline them and baby and coddle the crap out of them. Most mothers will sniff the farts of their sons and say it smells good. On the other hand, these women will treat their daughters like they are never good enough, which leads their daughters to try everything they can to be worthy of their love. So is it any surprise that the daughters of these women generally get better grades than their sons?
Parental love is the most conditional love I've ever seen. Remember these are the people that brought you into this miserable world, while making you suffer throughout, all the while not even liking each other. They DO NOT love you, trust me.
if the usamerican civil war was happening now instead of the 1800s you would see posts on here like "im literally disabled and i need a slave to function"
I've noticed my life improved significantly when I started keeping male-centered womens at arms length. For one, I don't want to be around men and they ALWAYS bring their man into everything. I had to cut a women off after she did the whole, 'I hate when someone brings their stupid boyfriend along to girls nights🙄' then brought her stupid boyfriend along because obviously she didn't mean HER man. Not to mention a lot of male-centered women are downright dangerous to be around. They will put you in the vicinity of predators and abusers, they will always side with a man, and they will direct their own hatred towards any women around them. They are the type of women that want feminists to exist so they can benefit from the work of other women, and always rely on a women when something goes wrong, but still laugh with their man about how the hairy, man-hating feminists are just mad because they can't get a man. I support organisations that help women, but I do not help individual women that are male-centered. They want endless support and sympathy from the same women they mock and help put in harms way. Not for me thanks.
That's the way to go girl. We need to protect ourselves from men but also dangerous women.
no fr ive had numerous female friends and family that blew me off years refusing to go out or do anything together then turn around and suddenly start playing friendly now that they have kids they want a free babysitter for.
talking about how it takes a village to raise a kid when what the mean is they can't actually afford to have kids and think me being 1. a women and 2. childfree means im just expected to help them raise the kid i deliberately didnt have. I dont caaaaare that motherhood is hard im not doing their work for them, they can actually stop expecting every female friend, cousin or niece to do free labour. especially when they refuse to ask any men to look after the kid, including its own damn father.
Ahh that's fucking gross. Give them the cold shoulder totally. No woman around my age that I'm close to has had kids yet, but I'm just waiting for it cause I know it's coming.
I feel like a lot of liberals, especially the younger generation, don't really have any core beliefs other than "let everyone do as they please!" they're radical individualists. If something makes me happy, then it's good. If something makes them happy, then it's good because who am i to get in the way of someone else's happiness and freedom. No structural analysis. No attachment to anything other than individual personal fulfilment. Very spineless imo and antithetical to socialism and feminism.
genuinely wondering do straight women actually enjoy getting mouth fucked? Like first of all eww there’s no way you’re letting that thing go anywhere near your mouth. We need to have a conversation about how that position is actually sexually degrading and is centered on male gaze and pleasure. Yes women are allowed to enjoy sex but the sex standards simply depend on the subjugation of women. Can’t believe humiliation and dehumanisation of women is being repackaged as “empowerment”.
Sometimes I forget that the most complex question most people care about is personal moral conduct and usually it’s just outrage that anyone could think that their arbitrarily chosen moral foundation (usually a religion) isn’t the most obviously true answer. And of course without a religion you have no solid moral foundation which is supposed to be the biggest problem ever because personal morality somehow matters so much. So you once again get a reason for people to be interpersonal moralists as a substitution for politics, the same way that they do that with dating arguments
Everyone makes exceptions, that’s why the world remains the same. “Can you believe we elected a sexual predator as president?” I can, because the same people complaining, sleep next to one themselves every night. Oh I forgot, your husband’s “barely legal teen” search history doesn’t count. He’s not really dangerous, he’s still one of the good ones.
Know that almost every individual on Earth is doing the exact same thing. Excusing those closest to them, no matter how horrific and depraved. Mentally ill sex addicts are the majority on this planet because everyone serves and worships them. As long as you’re related to, or make the masses feel good, they’ll look the other way.
“Children are being exploited!” They sure are, and it’s being done by the people around you. Why should everyone else live up to a moral code you don’t uphold yourself? Weak minded selfish egomaniacs are a danger to themselves and others, so they insist there’s a thousand rules and restrictions set in place to keep things “safe.” Guess who’s left to “enforce such things? People who are no different than them, ready to bend the rules whenever they see fit.
Adults get exactly what they ask for. It’s unfortunate that children must also suffer consequences, but that’s the fault of their parents. Endorsing humanity’s abusive system is a sign of support. You co-sign with your words and actions every single day. Very few people have real reason to be upset about the state of the world, those individuals being TRULY horrified at what this place represents.
Indulging sometimes and then repenting is still acceptance. Criticizing others while condoning your own behavior is a vote to keep the status quo. Participating in the game but becoming upset when you lose is nobody else’s fault. Protecting predators is partaking in abuse. Believing otherwise creates cognitive dissonance, which adds to the collective destruction around us.
Be who you say you are.
As a person who has worked with many groups of kids in my life, none of them has been hurt by a #childless woman on social media. A woman who is openly child-hating to the point she complains about crying kids on an airplane presents no harm to kids. These women are self-aware enough to know that they are not capable of caring for a child. What they truly hate is society constantly pressuring women to be mothers and caregivers. Even women who claim to be feminists refuse to understand that children are hurt by people who claim to love them and spend loads of unmonitored time with them (relatives, teachers, religious figures, and other caretakers). If you even spend five minutes in childless/antinatalist female spaces, it's about birth control, getting tubes tied without being married, and memes about having free time or dunking on people who say women without children can't be truly happy. Nowhere in these pages are women recounting abusing children or fantasies about harming children...you know...like men would.
"men can be misogynists while having gfs so why can't women do the same" and "sexualizing men is getting back at them" are such insidious false equivalents lol misogyny is a default for any male and they use sexualization as a tool of oppression because the system is built to oppress women. it's in their interests to keep women under the boot and their hatred for women isn't a source of cognitive dissonance in their relationships with women because they have the power in this dynamic. you claiming to be a misandrist while having a bf just proves you're a willing participant in your own subjugation and that you're all bark and no bite though
I think about your post about women’s feminist views coming from a place of genuinely loving men a lot.
radfeminism in general comes from a place of wanting to reform men and convince them to be niceys because women cannot let go of their love for them and honestly genuinely truly want to be loved back. and the tryhard misandry comes from a place of hurt, the realization that men view them as subhuman even though they crave their affection, respect and attention like nothing else - while desperately wanting to be treated as an equal. this is why they willingly and readily abandon both when the right nigel comes along lol they think that their nigel is different and that they themselves are different because they're experiencing it firsthand and their experiences are real, unlike everyone else's. but that's to be expected in a hetero society, no amount of politics will ever keep women and men from each other
We live in a world STEEPED in sexual objectification; where we hear about so-called "sex positivity" constantly; a world where BDSM and other amazingly harmful and revolting kinks are celebrated and those who are against them are shamed; where it's considered normal to walk around naked at public events, and to simulate sex on stage in musical performances that are viewed all over the globe...
And ONE blogger says, "I think these things are harmful," and people ACTUALLY have the audacity to show up and talk about how they're "tired of the sex-negativity."
It's just...astonishing, really. These people act like a fish suddenly taken out of water if they're exposed to a sex-negative or even anti-promiscuity/anti-kink post. "Put me back in my pool of shallow sexual objectification! THIS IS VIOLENCE!" 😹
*most toxic guy in the world voice* everyone just abandons me for no good reason. i have no idea why. it must be fate
The thing about people is that they believe what they want to believe, or what’s most convenient for them to believe at the moment. There is very little use in trying to convince someone that they are wrong about something. The best teacher is experience. One of the most difficult lessons you can learn is how to step back and let other people take a fall even if you know that the path they’re on will cause it. It’s a lonely life, watching other people walk themselves into pain and suffering. But there’s not much else to do on this planet. Only thing to do is make yourself as comfortable as you can in this game, if you opt to stay in.
i’m so tired of pretending that people who only understand ethics and morality through the lens of religion aren’t virtually the same as people who only understand politics and world events in harry potter terms
Pregnancy is not a punishment for having sex. Yes, even unprotected sex.
Parenthood isn’t a punishment for having sex, either. Parenthood is a lifelong responsibility that should knowingly be opted into; it isn’t a penalty for having sex and getting pregnant one (1) time.
Having sex is not an immoral act. Women having sex is not an immoral act. It does not need to be punished.
moids are absolutely terrified of women waking up and realizing they’d be happier without them.
I sometimes feel betrayed, concerned, in disbelief, and even disgusted with women's willful participation in patriarchy, but I am working on that. A day will come when I no longer care about any of it. From that moment on, it won't even register to me anymore. I will have accepted I was never truly owed sisterhood, nor is there a point in building it when you realise that the majority of women are deviants themselves, trapped in heated heterosexual foreplay.
Sisterhood comes across as a euphemism for labour from childfree women who are either in homosexual relationships or are celibate while the majority of women offer nothing to help those women's broken backs. They're more likely to drop a drawer of knives on their backs, really. It's not something I want to be a part of. Even among women, sisterhood is to sacrifice yourself for women who cater to males or have failed catering to males but learned nothing from it.
One day when I happen to see their struggle amongst themselves in endless cycles of empty words, cute slogans, and briefly trending hashtags while they continue loving men, regardless of how many times they prove unsalvageable, I'll not feel emotional about it at all anymore. And I will be a happier woman for it.
I feel like a lot of liberals, especially the younger generation, don't really have any core beliefs other than "let everyone do as they please!" they're radical individualists. If something makes me happy, then it's good. If something makes them happy, then it's good because who am i to get in the way of someone else's happiness and freedom. No structural analysis. No attachment to anything other than individual personal fulfilment. Very spineless imo and antithetical to socialism and feminism.
someone got salty that I said some women become mothers out of naked self interest / desire for more victims / free labor & called it a bad take. well. it's not a take it's an observation. some women even use their own children to secure pedophile mates and act as their children's pimps. there is nothing inherently sacred or sanctifying about motherhood & the people who want to pretend otherwise are often the ones who cry crocodile tears for sacred Motherhood when accused of (enabling) abuse
